Lindhout Josephine E, van Dalen Jan Willem, van Gool Willem A, Richard Edo, Hoevenaar-Blom Marieke P
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 May;40(5):e70092. doi: 10.1002/gps.70092.
Despite established links between apathy, cardiovascular disease, and dementia, it remains unclear if cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) play a mediating role in the association between apathy and dementia. If apathy increases dementia risk via lifestyle-related dementia risk factors, targeted lifestyle interventions could help high-risk individuals.
We used data from the preDIVA study including 3303 individuals aged 70-78 years. Apathy was assessed using the geriatric depression scale, and CVRF (cardiovascular risk factors) (systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and physical activity) were considered as potential mediators. Outcome was incident dementia during 12 years of follow-up. We assessed mediation using Multiple Mediation Analysis (MMA).
Of the association between apathy and dementia (HR 1.49 [95% CI 0.99-2.41]), 27% was mediated by physical inactivity, BMI and diabetes combined. Of this total, physical inactivity mediated 28% of the effect (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.29), diabetes 9% of the effect (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.10), and BMI counteracted these effects by -12% (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-0.98).
The relationship between apathy and dementia is partly mediated by physical inactivity, BMI and diabetes. Apathy is an important clinical marker that signals the existence of potentially modifiable pathways, providing an opportunity for lifestyle interventions. To potentially reduce dementia risk via lifestyle modification in patients with apathy, a tailored approach should be taken to overcome the characterizing symptom of diminished motivation.
尽管冷漠、心血管疾病和痴呆症之间已确立了联系,但心血管危险因素(CVRF)是否在冷漠与痴呆症的关联中起中介作用仍不清楚。如果冷漠通过与生活方式相关的痴呆症危险因素增加痴呆症风险,那么有针对性的生活方式干预可能会帮助高危个体。
我们使用了来自preDIVA研究的数据,该研究包括3303名70 - 78岁的个体。使用老年抑郁量表评估冷漠情况,并将心血管危险因素(收缩压、胆固醇、糖尿病、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟和身体活动)视为潜在中介因素。结局是随访12年期间的新发痴呆症。我们使用多重中介分析(MMA)评估中介作用。
在冷漠与痴呆症的关联(风险比1.49 [95%置信区间0.99 - 2.4I])中,27%由身体活动不足、BMI和糖尿病共同介导。在这一总数中,身体活动不足介导了28%的效应(风险比1.12,95%置信区间1.03 - 1.29),糖尿病介导了9%的效应(风险比1.04, 95%置信区间1.02 - 1.10),而BMI抵消了这些效应的12%(风险比0.95, 95%置信区间0.88 - 0.98)。
冷漠与痴呆症之间的关系部分由身体活动不足、BMI和糖尿病介导。冷漠是一个重要的临床标志物,表明存在潜在可改变的途径,为生活方式干预提供了机会。为了通过改变冷漠患者的生活方式来潜在降低痴呆症风险,应采取量身定制的方法来克服动机减弱这一特征性症状。