• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Repeat Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Significantly Lower Survivorship Compared to First-Time Revisions.

作者信息

Neitzke Colin C, Nocon Allina A, Bhatti Pravjit, Debbi Eytan M, Gausden Elizabeth B, Lee Gwo-Chin, Sculco Peter K, Chalmers Brian P

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S320-S329. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.085. Epub 2025 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.085
PMID:40349872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is an increasingly common challenge for arthroplasty surgeons. Compared to first-time rTKA, re-rTKA presents additional challenges, including further compromised soft tissues and bone loss, abundant scar tissue, stemmed revision implants, and metaphyseal fixation. The goal of this study was to compare the survivorship and clinical outcomes of aseptic first-time rTKAs and re-rTKAs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of aseptic rTKAs from a single institution from 2016 to 2022 identified 850 first-time rTKAs and 178 re-rTKAs. The mean age was 67 years, 58% were women, and the mean body mass index was 31. The mean operative time was longer for re-rTKAs (173 versus 160 minutes, P = 0.02), as was the hospital length of stay for the re-rTKA cohort (3.7 versus 3.2 days, P = 0.0007). Failure was defined as all-cause revision or revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

RESULTS

At 3.5 years, re-rTKAs had significantly lower survivorship free from all-cause revision than the first-time rTKA cohort (75 versus 91%, P < 0.0001). At 1.5 years, re-rTKAs had significantly lower survivorship free from revision for PJI than the first-time rTKA cohort (93 versus 98%, P = 0.003). Overall, the re-rTKA cohort had more all-cause failures (33 [19%] versus 55 [6%]; P < 0.0001) and more PJI failures (13 [7%] versus 17 [2%]; P = 0.0001). At the final follow up, the re-rTKA cohort had a significantly lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (62 versus 69, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to first-time rTKA, re-rTKA has significantly decreased survivorship free from all-cause revision at 3.5 years (58 versus 43%) and revision for PJI at 2 years (91 versus 98%). Optimization of care for rTKA patients at centers of excellence may improve the outcomes and care of these complex patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Repeat Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Significantly Lower Survivorship Compared to First-Time Revisions.
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S320-S329. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.085. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
The Fate of Highly Porous Titanium Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study.翻修全膝关节置换术中高孔隙率钛质胫骨假体的转归:一项多中心至少5年随访研究
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S363-S367. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.015. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3
Revision Knee Arthroplasty in a Tertiary Center: Infection Remains the Leading Cause for Primary Revisions, While Aseptic Loosening Led Causes for Rerevisions.三级医疗中心的膝关节翻修置换术:感染仍是初次翻修的主要原因,而无菌性松动是再次翻修的主要原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9):2226-2234. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.045. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection Based on the Korean National Registry between 2011 and 2019.基于2011年至2019年韩国国家注册登记数据的人工关节周围感染后翻修全膝关节置换术的负担
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(4):631-638. doi: 10.4055/cios24253. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
6
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to UKA Revisions Are Six-Times More Likely to Fail Than UKA to Total Knee Arthroplasty Conversions.单髁膝关节置换术翻修为单髁膝关节置换术失败的可能性是单髁膝关节置换术转换为全膝关节置换术的六倍。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.023.
7
New and Improved? Analysis of Generational Implant-Related Failures and All-Cause Revision Indications for Total Knee Arthroplasty Over a 30-Year Period.新的与改进的?30年全膝关节置换术中与植入物相关的代际失败及全因翻修指征分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9):2235-2242. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.046. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
8
Prior Femoral Canal Instrumentation Is a Major Risk Factor for Fixation Failure After Distal Femoral Replacement.既往股骨近端髓腔准备是股骨远端置换术后固定失败的主要危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9S1):S470-S480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.002. Epub 2025 May 9.
9
Impact of Metaphyseal Sleeves and Porous Cones on Risk Reduction for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Aseptic Re-Revision in a United States Integrated Health Care System.干骺端套筒和多孔锥体对全膝关节置换翻修风险降低的影响:美国综合医疗保健系统中的无菌再翻修
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9):2375-2380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.050. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
10
What Is the Survivorship of TKA With a Twin-peg or Spikes-and-keel Cementless Implant Compared With Cemented? A Registry-based Cohort Study.与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比,双柄或带钉-龙骨非骨水泥型植入物的TKA生存率如何?一项基于注册登记的队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1288-1298. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003385.