Livne Ilan, Ziv Arnona, Goldberg Yair, Huppert Amit
The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Israel; Samuel Neaman Institute for National Policy Research, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel.
The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Israel.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Aug;31(8):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.05.002. Epub 2025 May 9.
As COVID-19 has transitioned to an endemic disease, there is a need for evidence-based effective strategies to mitigate its public health impacts. This study aims to evaluate the protection offered by vaccination and hybrid immunity, particularly among the elderly, against severe disease by considering their immunological history and individual characteristics.
In a retrospective cohort study, data from the Israeli Ministry of Health (May 2022-April 2024) were analysed, including 1.2 million individuals aged 60 years and older who received at least three COVID-19 vaccine doses. Participants were categorized into two groups: those with hybrid immunity and those with vaccination and without documented previous infection. Poisson regression models, adjusted for age, sex, wave period, and time since the last immunological event, were used to estimate the risk of severe COVID-19.
Individuals without documented previous infection are 14.4 (95% CI, 13.2-15.7) times more at risk compared with those with hybrid immunity. Those aged 70-80 and 80+ are 3.7 (95% CI, 3.0-4.5) and 11.3 (95% CI, 9.3-13.7) times more at risk, respectively, than those aged 60-64. Males are at 1.6 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7) times higher risk than females. There is a substantial decrease over time in severe cases. Waning immunity is observed in the 3-6 months cohort, which is 1.8 (95% CI, 1.5-2.2) times more likely to develop severe disease than the 0-3 months cohort. No further waning immunity was observed after that.
At this post-pandemic stage, individuals with hybrid immunity had a significantly lower risk of severe disease. These findings support the prioritization of protection strategies for individuals without hybrid immunity and suggest that protection remains durable for at least one year.
由于新冠病毒已转变为一种地方性疾病,因此需要基于证据的有效策略来减轻其对公共卫生的影响。本研究旨在通过考虑老年人的免疫史和个体特征,评估疫苗接种和混合免疫(尤其是在老年人中)对重症疾病的保护作用。
在一项回顾性队列研究中,分析了以色列卫生部(2022年5月至2024年4月)的数据,包括120万60岁及以上且至少接种了三剂新冠疫苗的个体。参与者被分为两组:有混合免疫的个体和接种了疫苗但无既往感染记录的个体。使用经年龄、性别、疫情波次和自上次免疫事件以来的时间调整的泊松回归模型来估计重症新冠病毒感染的风险。
与有混合免疫的个体相比,无既往感染记录的个体患重症的风险高14.4倍(95%置信区间,13.2 - 15.7)。70 - 80岁和80岁以上的个体患重症的风险分别是60 - 64岁个体的3.7倍(95%置信区间,3.0 - 4.5)和11.3倍(95%置信区间,9.3 - 13.7)。男性患重症的风险比女性高1.6倍(95%置信区间,1.5 - 1.7)。随着时间推移,重症病例大幅减少。在3 - 6个月的队列中观察到免疫力下降,该队列患重症的可能性是0 - 3个月队列的1.8倍(95%置信区间,1.5 - 2.2)。之后未观察到进一步的免疫力下降。
在这个大流行后阶段,有混合免疫的个体患重症的风险显著更低。这些发现支持了对无混合免疫个体优先采取保护策略,并表明保护作用至少持续一年。