Suppr超能文献

头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的系统评价和荟萃分析

Cefazolin vs. antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Prosty Connor, Noutsios Dean, Lee Todd C, Daneman Nick, Davis Joshua S, Jager Nynke G L, Ghanem-Zoubi Nesrin, Goodman Anna L, Kaasch Achim J, Kouijzer Ilse, McMullan Brendan J, McDonald Emily G, Tong Steven Y C, Ong Sean W X

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Aug;31(8):1272-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.04.045. Epub 2025 May 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is debate on whether cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins should be the first-line treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia. Ongoing trials are investigating whether cefazolin is non-inferior to (flu)cloxacillin, but it remains uncertain whether these findings apply to other antistaphylococcal penicillins.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cefazolin with each of the individual antistaphylococcal penicillins for MSSA bacteraemia.

METHODS

Data sources: We updated a 2019 systematic review but specifically focused on evaluating outcomes by individual antistaphylococcal penicillins.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Study eligibility criteria include comparative observational studies.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants include patients with MSSA bacteraemia.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions include cefazolin vs. the antistaphylococcal penicillins.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Assessment of risk of bias involved the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality and we assessed for non-inferiority of cefazolin using a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of a pooled OR <1.2 using raw unadjusted data. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), discontinuation due to toxicity, and nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

No randomized data have been published. A total of 30 observational studies at moderate or high risk of bias were included, which comprised 3869 patients who received cefazolin and 11 644 patients who received antistaphylococcal penicillins (flucloxacillin = 6721, unspecified = 2440, nafcillin = 1305, cloxacillin = 1258, and oxacillin = 120). Cefazolin was associated with a reduced odds of 30-day all-cause mortality (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.85) compared with antistaphylococcal penicillins, meeting pre-specified non-inferiority. This effect was consistent vs. flucloxacillin (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.73-1.16), nafcillin (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.28-1.17), cloxacillin (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.11-1.58), and oxacillin (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.03-2.75). Point estimates favoured cefazolin for 90-day mortality, TRAEs, nephrotoxicity, and discontinuation due to toxicity overall and in each comparison with individual antistaphylococcal penicillins, except for TRAEs vs. cloxacillin.

DISCUSSION

In moderate-to low-quality observational data, cefazolin was non-inferior for mortality and potentially superior for safety as compared with antistaphylococcal penicillins overall and across most individual comparisons.

摘要

背景

对于头孢唑林或抗葡萄球菌青霉素是否应作为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症的一线治疗药物存在争议。正在进行的试验正在研究头孢唑林是否不劣于(氟)氯唑西林,但这些结果是否适用于其他抗葡萄球菌青霉素仍不确定。

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较头孢唑林与每种抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗MSSA菌血症的效果。

方法

数据来源:我们更新了2019年的系统评价,但特别关注按每种抗葡萄球菌青霉素评估结局。

研究纳入标准

研究纳入标准包括比较性观察性研究。

参与者

参与者包括MSSA菌血症患者。

干预措施

干预措施包括头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素的对比。

偏倚风险评估

偏倚风险评估涉及干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险工具。

数据合成方法

主要结局是30天全因死亡率,我们使用预先设定的合并OR<1.2的非劣效性界值,通过未调整的原始数据评估头孢唑林的非劣效性。次要结局包括90天死亡率、治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)、因毒性停药和肾毒性。

结果

尚无随机数据发表。共纳入30项偏倚风险为中度或高度的观察性研究,其中3869例患者接受了头孢唑林治疗,11644例患者接受了抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗(氟氯西林=6721例,未明确指定=2440例,萘夫西林=1305例,氯唑西林=1258例,苯唑西林=120例)。与抗葡萄球菌青霉素相比,头孢唑林与30天全因死亡率降低相关(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.62-0.85),达到预先设定的非劣效性标准。与氟氯西林(OR=0.92,95%CI:0.73-1.16)、萘夫西林(OR=0.58,95%CI:0.28-1.17)、氯唑西林(OR=0.42,95%CI:0.11-1.58)和苯唑西林(OR=0.31,95%CI:0.03-2.75)相比,该效果一致。总体而言,在90天死亡率、TRAEs、肾毒性以及因毒性停药方面,除与氯唑西林比较TRAEs外,各点估计值均支持头孢唑林,且在与每种抗葡萄球菌青霉素的每项比较中均如此。

讨论

在中低质量的观察性数据中,与抗葡萄球菌青霉素总体相比以及在大多数个体比较中,头孢唑林在死亡率方面不劣,在安全性方面可能更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验