• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非豪登省长期护理机构中的生活质量:一项关于老年人观点的机构民族志研究

Quality of life in long-term care facilities in Gauteng, South Africa: an institutional ethnographic study of older adults' perspectives.

作者信息

Hlongwane Naomi, Ned Lieketseng

机构信息

Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Heatlh Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Division of Disability and Rehabilitation Studies, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Heatlh Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 May 11;15(5):e099448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099448.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099448
PMID:40350194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12067836/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The increasing demand for long-term care (LTC) services in resource-constrained settings has highlighted significant gaps in both the quality of care and the quality of life (QoL) for older adults. The objective of this study is to examine the lived experiences of QoL among older individuals in LTC facilities.

METHODS

Using an institutional ethnographic approach, we conducted indepth interviews with 20 residents, aged 62-98 years, across five LTC facilities in Gauteng, South Africa. Indexing and mapping were used to identify emergent categories. The authors used reflexive methods, and member checking was conducted.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed seven interconnected dimensions of QoL: health and physical well-being, social connectedness and companionship, spiritual fulfilment and faith, independence and autonomy, dignity and respect, emotional well-being and acceptance and adaptation. These aspects are closely linked to institutional factors such as staff capacity, resource allocation and care policies. Participants emphasised the importance of meaningful social interactions, spiritual practices, autonomy and dignity in enhancing their QoL.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the complex relationship between institutional care practices and the QoL of older adults in resource-constrained environments. Findings advocate for culturally sensitive, person-centred care strategies to improve the multifaceted QoL of LTC residents, offering valuable insights for policy reforms and interventions in similar resource-constrained settings.

摘要

引言

在资源有限的环境中,对长期护理(LTC)服务的需求不断增加,这凸显了老年人护理质量和生活质量(QoL)方面的显著差距。本研究的目的是考察长期护理机构中老年人的生活质量体验。

方法

我们采用机构民族志方法,对南非豪登省五家长期护理机构的20名年龄在62至98岁之间的居民进行了深入访谈。使用索引和映射来识别新出现的类别。作者采用了反思性方法,并进行了成员核对。

结果

分析揭示了生活质量的七个相互关联的维度:健康与身体福祉、社会联系与陪伴、精神满足与信仰、独立与自主、尊严与尊重、情绪福祉以及接纳与适应。这些方面与诸如工作人员能力、资源分配和护理政策等机构因素密切相关。参与者强调了有意义的社会互动、精神实践、自主和尊严对提高他们生活质量的重要性。

结论

该研究强调了在资源有限的环境中,机构护理实践与老年人生活质量之间的复杂关系。研究结果倡导采用文化敏感、以人为本的护理策略,以改善长期护理居民多方面的生活质量,为类似资源有限环境中的政策改革和干预措施提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/12067836/f352b5f5733e/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/12067836/34296d397c26/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/12067836/f352b5f5733e/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/12067836/34296d397c26/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/12067836/f352b5f5733e/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of life in long-term care facilities in Gauteng, South Africa: an institutional ethnographic study of older adults' perspectives.南非豪登省长期护理机构中的生活质量:一项关于老年人观点的机构民族志研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 11;15(5):e099448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099448.
2
Social connection in long-term care homes: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.长期护理院中的社交联系:障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05454-8.
3
Care Perceptions among Residents of LTC Facilities Purporting to Offer Person-Centred Care.声称提供以人为本护理的长期护理机构居民的护理认知
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):149-60. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000167. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
Older Adult Residents' Perceptions of Daily Lives in Nursing Homes.老年居民对养老院日常生活的认知
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Sep;49(5):495-503. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12314. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Perceived Empowerment, Social Support, and Quality of Life Among Chinese Older Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities.长期护理机构中中国老年居民的感知赋权、社会支持和生活质量。
J Aging Health. 2018 Dec;30(10):1595-1619. doi: 10.1177/0898264318795724. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
6
Perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care among older nursing home residents at the end of life.临终时老年疗养院居民对灵性和灵性关怀的认知
Holist Nurs Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):285-9; quiz 290-1. doi: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000298611.02352.46.
7
Assessing virtual reality acceptance in long-term care facilities: a quantitative study with older adults.评估长期护理机构中的虚拟现实接受度:一项针对老年人的定量研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Oct;19(7):2602-2614. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2295946. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
"Small" things matter: residents' involvement in practice improvements in long-term care facilities.“小”事至关重要:长期护理机构中居民参与实践改进
J Aging Stud. 2014 Dec;31:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
9
The Social Organization of Quality of Life of Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Institutional Ethnography Approach.长期护理机构中老年人生活质量的社会组织:一种制度民族志方法。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Mar 12;12:23333936251324267. doi: 10.1177/23333936251324267. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
Barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end-of-life palliative care in long-term care facilities: a qualitative descriptive study of community-based and specialist palliative care physicians' experiences, perceptions and perspectives.长期护理机构中最佳支持性临终姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素:一项基于社区和专科姑息治疗医生的经验、看法和观点的定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):e037466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037466.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of long-term care interventions on healthcare utilisation among older persons: a scoping review of reviews.长期护理干预对老年人医疗利用的影响:综述的综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05097-9.
2
Residential Environments for Older Persons: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2005-2022).老年人居住环境:全面文献综述(2005-2022 年)。
HERD. 2023 Jul;16(3):291-337. doi: 10.1177/19375867231152611. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
What quality of life domains are most important to older adults in residential care?
在居住式护理中,哪些生活质量领域对老年人最重要?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):21-42. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2134691. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Elements of Long-Term Care That Promote Quality of Life for Indigenous and First Nations Peoples: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.促进原住民和第一民族人民生活质量的长期护理要素:混合方法系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jan 1;64(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac153.
5
The UN Decade of healthy ageing: strengthening measurement for monitoring health and wellbeing of older people.联合国健康老龄化十年:加强对老年人健康和福祉的监测措施。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jul 1;51(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac147.
6
Factors associated with the quality of life of multi-professional health residentes.多专业卫生驻院医师生活质量的相关因素。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jun 24;75(6):e20210541. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0541. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring Interrelations Between Person-Centered Care and Quality of Life Following a Transition Into Long-Term Residential Care: A Meta-Ethnography.探索以患者为中心的护理与长期居住护理后生活质量之间的关系:元民族志研究。
Gerontologist. 2023 May 9;63(4):660-673. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac027.
8
Quality of life among frail older persons (65+ years) in nursing homes: A cross-sectional study.养老机构中体弱老年人(65 岁以上)的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1232-1242. doi: 10.1002/nop2.739. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Continuing education interventions about person-centered care targeted for nurses in older people long-term care: a systematic review.针对老年人长期护理护士的以患者为中心护理的继续教育干预措施:一项系统综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Apr 28;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00585-4.
10
A decade of public long-term care insurance in South Korea: Policy lessons for aging countries.韩国十年的公共长期护理保险:老龄化国家的政策教训。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 7.