Silvagni Ettore, Bortoluzzi Alessandra, Occhino Giuseppe, Bellelli Giuseppe, Garaffoni Carlo, Delvino Paolo, Leoni Olivia, Valsecchi Maria Grazia, Scirè Carlo Alberto, Rebora Paola
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Cona (Ferrara), Italy.
Bicocca Bioinformatics, Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre - B4 School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1565909. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1565909. eCollection 2025.
The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and to explore the interactions with patient profiles [including age, baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk, and frailty, which is a state of decreased physiological reserve, assessed using a validated frailty index (FI) for healthcare administrative databases (AHDs)].
This retrospective study was based on AHDs of the Lombardy region, Italy (from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2023). Cox regression models, both crude and adjusted, were applied to estimate the association between treatments and outcomes [CVEs, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and thromboembolic events (TEs)]. We tested the interaction between the drug treatment and the regulatory agency prescription rule changes [before or after 06th July 2021, the date of the first European Medicine Association (EMA) pronouncement on tofacitinib safety] or patient profiles.
We identified 7,541 therapeutic courses in 5,563 patients: 2,343 started as TNFi users, 1,443 as JAKi users, and 1,777 started with other drugs (1,459 days of follow-up). The crude incidence rates (IRs) for new CVEs were 16.6 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 12.8-21.2] and 18.6 (95% CI: 14.2-23.9) per 1,000 person-years (PYs) for TNFi and JAKi users, respectively. Exposure to JAKis was not associated with a significantly increased risk of CVEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.64-1.32], MACEs (adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.37-1.33), or TEs (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.65-3.65) compared to TNFis. Each 0.1-point increment of the FI significantly increased the HR for new CVEs (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.48-2.19), MACEs (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.10-2.51), and TEs (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.03-2.78). When assessing the interaction between the period of drug delivery and the treatment with JAKis on the risk of new CVEs, no significant interaction was observed (p = 0.838), while the interaction was statistically significant for baseline CV risk (p = 0.007).
RA patients treated with JAKis in real-world settings have a risk of developing CVEs no higher than those of TNFi users, but potential signals remain for TEs, even if the sample was not sufficiently powered. Patient profiles, particularly the frailty, have a more substantial impact on the risk of CVEs than the specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) choice.
本研究旨在比较评估接受Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)或肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者发生心血管事件(CVE)的风险,并探讨与患者特征[包括年龄、基线心血管(CV)风险和虚弱状态(一种生理储备下降的状态,使用针对医疗保健管理数据库(AHD)的经过验证的虚弱指数(FI)进行评估)]之间的相互作用。
这项回顾性研究基于意大利伦巴第地区的AHD(从2020年1月1日至2023年12月31日)。应用粗模型和调整后的Cox回归模型来估计治疗与结局[CVE、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和血栓栓塞事件(TE)]之间的关联。我们测试了药物治疗与监管机构处方规则变化[在2021年7月6日之前或之后,即欧洲药品管理局(EMA)首次发布关于托法替布安全性声明的日期]或患者特征之间的相互作用。
我们在5563例患者中确定了7541个治疗疗程:2343例起始使用TNFi,1443例起始使用JAKi,1777例起始使用其他药物(随访1459天)。TNFi和JAKi使用者中新发CVE的粗发病率(IR)分别为每1000人年(PY)16.6[95%置信区间(95%CI):12.8 - 21.2]和18.6(95%CI:14.2 - 23.9)。与TNFi相比,使用JAKi与CVE[调整后风险比(HR):0.92;95%CI:0.64 - 1.32]、MACE(调整后HR:0.71;95%CI:0.37 - 1.33)或TE(调整后HR:1.53;95%CI:0.65 - 3.65)风险的显著增加无关。FI每增加0.1分,新发CVE(HR:1.80;95%CI:1.48 - 2.19)、MACE(HR:1.66;95%CI:1.10 - 2.51)和TE(HR:1.69;95%CI:1.03 - 2.78)的HR显著增加。在评估药物给药时期与使用JAKi治疗对新发CVE风险的相互作用时,未观察到显著的相互作用(p = 0.838),而对于基线CV风险,相互作用具有统计学意义(p = 0.007)。
在现实环境中接受JAKi治疗的RA患者发生CVE的风险不高于使用TNFi的患者,但即使样本量不足,TE仍存在潜在信号。患者特征,尤其是虚弱状态,对CVE风险的影响比特定的改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)选择更大。