Suppr超能文献

镜像思维:评估日常生活中自我评估与他人反馈评估的相对稳定性

Mirroring minds: assessing the relative stability of self-appraisal and reflected appraisal in daily life.

作者信息

Gütges Isabel Dorothee, Xi Haoran, Gauggel Siegfried, Forster Saskia Doreen

机构信息

Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1576353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1576353. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cultivating a stable self-concept is vital for mental and social well-being. Instability in the processing of self-related information, particularly concerning self-views, have been associated with various mental disorders. Central to the stability of self-perception are two key constructs: self-appraisal and reflected appraisal. Self-appraisal refers to individuals' personal evaluations of their worth, while reflected appraisal encompasses beliefs about how one is perceived by others. Although previous laboratory studies have examined the formation and impact of self-appraisal and reflected appraisal on self-concept, fluctuations in reflected appraisal relative to self-appraisal in daily life remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to address this gap by examining the variability of both appraisal types and their association with mood changes in everyday contexts.

METHODS

Utilizing ecological momentary assessment, student participants reported their self-appraisal, reflected appraisal, and mood eight times daily over a ten-day period.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that self-appraisal exhibited between-subject (ICC = 0.70) and within-subject (ICC = 0.30) variability. Also, reflected appraisal demonstrated between-subject variability (ICC = 0.72) and within-subject variability (ICC = 0.28). Notably, the results indicated that self-appraisal fluctuated more significantly than reflected appraisal ( = 2.58, df = 98,  = 0.01). Furthermore, a moderate correlation was observed between self-appraisal variability and mood variability ( = 0.45,  < 0.01), whereas the correlation for reflected appraisal variability was weaker ( = 0.35,  < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

These findings underscore the distinct fluctuation patterns of self-appraisal and reflected appraisal in daily life, suggesting that reflected appraisal serves as a stabilizing anchor for self-concept consistency. This study provides a crucial foundation for future research on normative stability within the self-concept framework.

摘要

引言

培养稳定的自我概念对心理和社会幸福感至关重要。自我相关信息处理过程中的不稳定性,尤其是关于自我观点的不稳定性,与各种精神障碍有关。自我认知稳定性的核心是两个关键概念:自我评估和反射性评估。自我评估是指个体对自身价值的个人评价,而反射性评估则包括关于他人如何看待自己的信念。尽管先前的实验室研究已经考察了自我评估和反射性评估对自我概念的形成及影响,但在日常生活中,反射性评估相对于自我评估的波动情况仍 largely 未被探索。本研究旨在通过考察这两种评估类型的变异性及其与日常情境中情绪变化的关联来填补这一空白。

方法

利用生态瞬时评估,学生参与者在十天内每天报告八次他们的自我评估、反射性评估和情绪。

结果

分析表明,自我评估表现出个体间变异性(组内相关系数 = 0.70)和个体内变异性(组内相关系数 = 0.30)。此外,反射性评估也表现出个体间变异性(组内相关系数 = 0.72)和个体内变异性(组内相关系数 = 0.28)。值得注意的是,结果表明自我评估的波动比反射性评估更显著(t = 2.58,自由度 = 98,p = 0.01)。此外,自我评估变异性与情绪变异性之间存在中等程度的相关性(r = 0.45,p < 0.01),而反射性评估变异性的相关性则较弱(r = 0.35,p < 0.01)。

讨论

这些发现强调了自我评估和反射性评估在日常生活中的不同波动模式,表明反射性评估为自我概念的一致性提供了一个稳定的锚定。本研究为自我概念框架内规范稳定性的未来研究提供了关键基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验