• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EuleApp©:一种用于早期识字技能的计算机自适应评估工具。

EuleApp©: a computerized adaptive assessment tool for early literacy skills.

作者信息

Yumus Melike, Stuhr Christina, Meindl Marlene, Leuschner Haug, Jungmann Tanja

机构信息

Department of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Faculty of Philosophy, Institute for Sports Science, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1522740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522740. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522740
PMID:40351601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12062173/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ample evidence indicates that assessing children's early literacy skills is crucial for later academic success. This assessment enables the provision of necessary support and materials while engaging them in the culture of print and books before school entry. However, relatively few assessment tools are available to identify early literacy skills, such as concepts of print, print awareness, phonological awareness, word awareness, alphabet knowledge, and early reading. The digital landscape presents new opportunities to enhance these assessments and provide enriching early literacy experiences. This study examines the psychometric properties of an adaptive assessment tool, EuLeApp©, focusing on its reliability and concurrent validity.

METHODS

Data involved 307 German kindergarten children (M = 64 months old, range = 45-91). A Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) method, grounded in Item Response Theory (IRT), was employed to develop an adaptive digital tool for assessing early literacy competencies. We utilized an automatic item selection procedure based on item difficulty and discrimination parameters for the 183-item pool to ensure a precise and efficient assessment tailored to each child's ability level.

RESULTS

The 4-parameter Logistic (4PL) model was identified as the best-fitting model for adaptive assessment, providing the highest precision in estimating children's abilities within this framework.

DISCUSSIONS

The findings support the idea that the adaptive digital-based assessment tool EuLeApp© can be used to assess early literacy skills. It also provides a foundation for offering individualized and adaptable learning opportunities embedded in daily routines in daycare centers.

摘要

引言

大量证据表明,评估儿童的早期读写能力对其日后的学业成功至关重要。这种评估能够在儿童入学前让他们接触印刷品和书籍文化的同时,提供必要的支持和材料。然而,用于识别早期读写能力(如印刷概念、印刷意识、语音意识、单词意识、字母知识和早期阅读)的评估工具相对较少。数字领域为加强这些评估并提供丰富的早期读写体验带来了新机遇。本研究考察了一种自适应评估工具EuLeApp©的心理测量特性,重点关注其信度和同时效度。

方法

数据涉及307名德国幼儿园儿童(平均年龄M = 64个月,范围 = 45 - 91个月)。采用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的计算机自适应测试(CAT)方法,开发了一种用于评估早期读写能力的自适应数字工具。我们针对183个项目库,利用基于项目难度和区分度参数的自动项目选择程序,以确保根据每个孩子的能力水平进行精确而高效的评估。

结果

四参数逻辑斯蒂(4PL)模型被确定为最适合自适应评估的模型,在此框架内对儿童能力的估计具有最高精度。

讨论

研究结果支持这样一种观点,即基于数字自适应的评估工具EuLeApp©可用于评估早期读写能力。它还为在日托中心的日常活动中提供个性化和适应性强的学习机会奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/33bc11406b23/fpsyg-16-1522740-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/4325bca147b5/fpsyg-16-1522740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/b3f3801bc738/fpsyg-16-1522740-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/64c4fb05baa4/fpsyg-16-1522740-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/063a448ee639/fpsyg-16-1522740-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/aded29d0a31d/fpsyg-16-1522740-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/33bc11406b23/fpsyg-16-1522740-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/4325bca147b5/fpsyg-16-1522740-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/b3f3801bc738/fpsyg-16-1522740-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/64c4fb05baa4/fpsyg-16-1522740-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/063a448ee639/fpsyg-16-1522740-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/aded29d0a31d/fpsyg-16-1522740-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aef9/12062173/33bc11406b23/fpsyg-16-1522740-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
EuleApp©: a computerized adaptive assessment tool for early literacy skills.EuleApp©:一种用于早期识字技能的计算机自适应评估工具。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1522740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522740. eCollection 2025.
2
Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Test of Preschool Early Literacy-Phonological Awareness Test Among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children and Hearing Children.聋儿和听力正常儿童学前早期读写能力-语音意识测验的因子有效性和测量不变性。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):278-292. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000485.
3
The oral language and emergent literacy skills of preschoolers: Early childhood teachers' self-reported role, knowledge and confidence.学龄前儿童的口语语言和早期读写能力:幼儿教师的自我报告角色、知识和信心。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):154-168. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12777. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
4
Effects of an Early Literacy Intervention for Linguistically Diverse Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study.针对语言多样化儿童的早期读写能力干预效果:一项准实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 29;11:569854. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569854. eCollection 2020.
5
Preschool emergent literacy skills as predictors of reading and spelling in Grade 2 and the role of migration background in Germany.学前综合读写能力对二年级阅读和拼写的预测作用,以及德国移民背景的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105927. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105927. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
6
Development of a Group Emergent Literacy Screening Tool.团体紧急读写能力筛查工具的开发。
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;10(2):306. doi: 10.3390/children10020306.
7
Logometro: The psychometric properties of a norm-referenced digital battery for language assessment of Greek-speaking 4-7 years old children.Logometro:一种用于评估4至7岁希腊语儿童语言能力的常模参照数字测试组合的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:900600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900600. eCollection 2022.
8
Validity and reliability of a physical literacy knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and behaviors questionnaire for early childhood educators (PLKASB-ECE): An exploratory factor analysis.适用于幼儿教育工作者的身体素养知识、态度、自我效能和行为问卷(PLKASB-ECE)的有效性和可靠性:探索性因素分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 28;19(10):e0312736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312736. eCollection 2024.
9
Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)在台湾慢性病患者中的有效性检验和文化调适:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e32855. doi: 10.2196/32855.
10
Parental Writing Support and Preschoolers' Early Literacy, Language, and Fine Motor Skills.家长的写作支持与学龄前儿童的早期读写能力、语言能力和精细运动技能
Early Child Res Q. 2014;29(4):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.07.002.

本文引用的文献

1
Preschool emergent literacy skills as predictors of reading and spelling in Grade 2 and the role of migration background in Germany.学前综合读写能力对二年级阅读和拼写的预测作用,以及德国移民背景的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Aug;244:105927. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105927. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
2
WordSword: An Efficient Online Word Reading Assessment for Global English.WordSword:一种面向全球英语的高效在线单词阅读评估方法。
Assessment. 2024 Jun;31(4):875-891. doi: 10.1177/10731911231194971. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Logometro: The psychometric properties of a norm-referenced digital battery for language assessment of Greek-speaking 4-7 years old children.
Logometro:一种用于评估4至7岁希腊语儿童语言能力的常模参照数字测试组合的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:900600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900600. eCollection 2022.
4
Interventions Targeting Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Prevention and Treatment.针对卒中预防和治疗中的种族/民族差异的干预措施。
Stroke. 2020 Nov;51(11):3425-3432. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030427. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
6
Self-concept in poor readers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阅读能力较差者的自我概念:系统评价与荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 16;8:e8772. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8772. eCollection 2020.
7
On the Development of a Computer-Based Tool for Formative Student Assessment: Epistemological, Methodological, and Practical Issues.基于计算机的学生形成性评估工具的开发:认识论、方法论及实践问题
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02245. eCollection 2018.
8
The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.高风险测试中多项选择题的最佳选项数:应用修订的指数检测非功能干扰项。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Mar;24(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9855-9. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Assessing Construct Validity in Math Achievement: An Application of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM).评估数学成绩中的结构效度:多层结构方程模型(MSEM)的应用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 5;9:1451. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01451. eCollection 2018.
10
Measuring preschool learning engagement in the laboratory.在实验室中测量学前儿童的学习参与度。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:93-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Nov 28.