Teo Ee Fung, Sharp Claire R, Boyd Corrin J, Chee Weiqin
Western Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty (WAVES), Success, WA, Australia.
School of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 25;12:1551312. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1551312. eCollection 2025.
Prokinetics are used to treat gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility in critically ill dogs but there have been no published studies characterizing their use. The objective of this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was to describe the use of the prokinetics erythromycin and metoclopramide in dogs hospitalized in two institutions. We hypothesized that there would be change over time and differences between institutions in the use of erythromycin and metoclopramide.
Dogs for inclusion were identified by fee code searches for injectable erythromycin and metoclopramide in the electronic medical record systems of The Animal Hospital at Murdoch University and Western Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty Hospital for the years 2018 and 2023. 75 cases from each hospital in each year were selected for inclusion from the search results using a formal randomization procedure to yield a total case number of 300. Data collected for each dog included signalment, diagnosis, reason(s) for starting prokinetics, the injectable prokinetic(s) used, frequency, and doses. Chi square or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate to compare the proportions of dogs receiving metoclopramide alone, erythromycin alone, or both prokinetics in 2018 and 2023, the proportions of dogs receiving metoclopramide or erythromycin as sole prokinetics between the two institutions, and the proportions of dogs receiving a single prokinetic versus dual prokinetics between the two institutions.
Primary GI diseases accounted for the majority of the diagnoses. The most common reasons for starting a prokinetic were vomiting, an imaging diagnosis of ileus, prophylaxis following abdominal surgery, and regurgitation. Metoclopramide was administered as a sole prokinetic in the majority of dogs, fewer cases received erythromycin alone, or both prokinetics. Use of metoclopramide alone decreased from 2018 to 2023, with more dogs receiving erythromycin alone or both prokinetics in 2023. There were also significant differences in prokinetic use between institutions.
Prospective studies to investigate the effectiveness and safety of metoclopramide and erythromycin as prokinetics in dogs are warranted.
促动力药用于治疗危重病犬的胃肠道动力障碍,但尚无已发表的研究对其使用情况进行描述。这项多机构回顾性队列研究的目的是描述促动力药红霉素和胃复安在两家机构住院犬中的使用情况。我们假设随着时间的推移,红霉素和胃复安的使用情况会发生变化,且两家机构之间存在差异。
通过在默多克大学动物医院和西澳大利亚兽医急诊与专科医院2018年和2023年的电子病历系统中按收费代码搜索注射用红霉素和胃复安来确定纳入研究的犬只。每年从每家医院的搜索结果中使用正式随机程序选取75例病例纳入研究,最终病例总数为300例。为每只犬收集的数据包括特征、诊断、开始使用促动力药的原因、使用的注射用促动力药、频率和剂量。根据情况使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验来比较2018年和2023年单独使用胃复安、单独使用红霉素或同时使用两种促动力药的犬只比例,两家机构中单独使用胃复安或红霉素作为唯一促动力药的犬只比例,以及两家机构中使用单一促动力药与使用两种促动力药的犬只比例。
原发性胃肠道疾病占大多数诊断。开始使用促动力药的最常见原因是呕吐、肠梗阻的影像学诊断、腹部手术后的预防以及反流。大多数犬只单独使用胃复安作为促动力药,较少病例单独使用红霉素或同时使用两种促动力药。从2018年到2023年,单独使用胃复安的情况减少,2023年有更多犬只单独使用红霉素或同时使用两种促动力药。两家机构在促动力药的使用上也存在显著差异。
有必要进行前瞻性研究以调查胃复安和红霉素作为犬促动力药的有效性和安全性。