Suppr超能文献

评估格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分在社区医院对上消化道出血风险分层的作用:一项回顾性研究

Evaluating The Glasgow Blatchford Score for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Stratification in A Community Hospital: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Neamah Hind H, Davies Alexandra, Teta Anthony, Brannan Grace D, Abdelaziz Sami, Kovan Bruce

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Clemens, MI, USA McLaren Health Care- Macomb Hospital.

Internal Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine.

出版信息

Spartan Med Res J. 2025 May 1;10(1):15-22. doi: 10.51894/001c.137546. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is the most common emergency in gastroenterology. The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) is a validated tool used for risk stratification. The cutoff values for GBS to predict the need for clinical intervention, endoscopic treatment, and mortality, are not consistent. To determine the relationship between mean GBS score and the need for hemostatic intervention, and blood transfusion, and to evaluate quality of care and proper allocation of resources at our midwestern community hospital.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively extracted records for patients ≥18 years who were admitted for UGIB and underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between July 2018 and July 2020. GBS was calculated for each observation. Multivariate analysis and a logistic regression model were performed to predict the GBS score, and the odds ratio, associated with the need for hemostatic intervention and blood transfusion while controlling for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The GBS sample mean score was 11.17. Those who required hemostatic intervention and blood transfusion scored significantly higher GBS (13.18 versus 10.79) and (13.57 versus 9.21), respectively. A GBS of >10 was associated with higher odds at 21.84 (CI: 10.324,46.185, P<0.001) and 5.085 (CI: 1.864, 13.872, P=0.001) for receiving blood transfusion and hemostatic intervention, respectively. A cutoff of 10 was 22.41% sensitive and 95.41% specific for requiring hemostatic interventions and 66.67% sensitive and 89.91% specific for receiving blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

There is a clinical role to using the GBS even at a score higher than 2 to further stratify the severity of UGIB and determine the need for intervention. The sensitivity of a score of 10 on the GBS in this dataset was low. A cutoff with higher sensitivity is needed to stratify a life-threatening condition such as UGIB.

摘要

引言

上消化道出血(UGIB)是胃肠病学中最常见的急症。格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分(GBS)是一种经过验证的用于风险分层的工具。GBS预测临床干预、内镜治疗和死亡率的临界值并不一致。为了确定GBS平均评分与止血干预需求、输血需求之间的关系,并评估我们中西部社区医院的医疗质量和资源的合理分配。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们回顾性提取了2018年7月至2020年7月期间因UGIB入院并接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查的18岁及以上患者的记录。为每个观察对象计算GBS。进行多变量分析和逻辑回归模型以预测GBS评分以及在控制混杂因素的情况下与止血干预和输血需求相关的比值比。

结果

GBS样本平均评分为11.17。那些需要止血干预和输血的患者GBS评分显著更高,分别为(13.18对10.79)和(13.57对9.21)。GBS>10与接受输血和止血干预的较高比值比相关,分别为21.84(CI:10.324,46.

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding.ACG 临床指南:上消化道和溃疡出血。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验