• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振扩散峰度成像在胶质瘤分子分类中的诊断及预测性能:一项系统评价与Meta分析

The diagnostic and prediction performance of MR diffusion kurtosis imaging in the glioma molecular classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Hongfang, Hou Zonggang, He Qifeng, Liu Xinlong, Xie Jian

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1543619. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1543619. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1543619
PMID:40352771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12061957/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI), particularly diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), has demonstrated efficacy in distinguishing between low- and high-grade gliomas, its predictive utility across various molecular genotypes remains unclear. Evaluating the accuracy of DKI and identifying sources of heterogeneity in its predictive performance could advance noninvasive molecular diagnostic methods and support the development of personalized treatment strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline databases was performed. The studies retrieved were screened by two researchers (HFZ and ZGH), and those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were subsequently included in the meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The analyses summarized the mean differences in mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) in patients harboring various genotypes using suitable models, and explored heterogeneity. Finally, a bivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation method and meta-regression analysis were performed to assess diagnostic potential and stability.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 886 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Regarding MK and MD, the mean difference between isocitrate dehydrogenase () mutation and wild type was -0.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.27 to -0.15;  = 93%) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.33;  = 92%), respectively. This heterogeneity could be explained by imaging parameters such as repetition time, echo time, maximal -value, and number of diffusion directions. However, the mean difference did not reflect the genetic status of 1p/19q, -thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome-X-linked () gene, or O-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (). Analysis of diagnostic accuracy revealed that the pooled areas under the curve for MK and MD, based on status, were 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.81), respectively. Heterogeneity was not observed for these DKI parameters.

CONCLUSION

MK and MD exhibited potential diagnostic utility in the prediction of glioma molecular status and should be explored in medical practice. These parameters should be compared with other MRI models to develop a stable and suitable genetic molecular prediction method for patients with gliomas.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024568923, CRD42024568923.

摘要

背景

尽管扩散磁共振成像(dMRI),尤其是扩散峰度成像(DKI),已在区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤方面显示出有效性,但其在各种分子基因型中的预测效用仍不清楚。评估DKI的准确性并确定其预测性能中的异质性来源,可能会推动非侵入性分子诊断方法的发展,并支持个性化治疗策略的制定。

材料与方法

对PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Medline数据库进行文献检索。检索到的研究由两名研究人员(HFZ和ZGH)进行筛选,符合纳入标准的研究随后被纳入荟萃分析。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS-2)工具评估研究质量。分析使用合适的模型总结了携带各种基因型患者的平均峰度(MK)和平均扩散率(MD)的平均差异,并探讨了异质性。最后,进行双变量限制最大似然估计方法和荟萃回归分析,以评估诊断潜力和稳定性。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了14项研究,共886例患者。关于MK和MD,异柠檬酸脱氢酶()突变型与野生型之间的平均差异分别为-0.21(95%置信区间[CI]-0.27至-0.15; =93%)和0.22(95%CI 0.11至0.33; =92%)。这种异质性可以通过成像参数来解释,如重复时间、回波时间、最大 -值和扩散方向数。然而,平均差异并未反映1p/19q、X连锁的地中海贫血/智力发育迟缓综合征()基因或O-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶()的基因状态。诊断准确性分析显示,基于 状态的MK和MD的汇总曲线下面积分别为0.96(95%CI 0.93至0.97)和0.76(95%CI 0.71至0.81)。这些DKI参数未观察到异质性。

结论

MK和MD在预测胶质瘤分子状态方面显示出潜在的诊断效用,应在医学实践中进行探索。应将这些参数与其他MRI模型进行比较,以开发一种稳定且合适的胶质瘤患者基因分子预测方法。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024568923,CRD42024568923。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/e4d9b2ec8f26/fneur-16-1543619-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/b8029b4fa057/fneur-16-1543619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/69200fed4e98/fneur-16-1543619-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/3e4909c4272a/fneur-16-1543619-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/2ffa103446c8/fneur-16-1543619-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/bed3537b4976/fneur-16-1543619-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/e4d9b2ec8f26/fneur-16-1543619-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/b8029b4fa057/fneur-16-1543619-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/69200fed4e98/fneur-16-1543619-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/3e4909c4272a/fneur-16-1543619-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/2ffa103446c8/fneur-16-1543619-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/bed3537b4976/fneur-16-1543619-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0701/12061957/e4d9b2ec8f26/fneur-16-1543619-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The diagnostic and prediction performance of MR diffusion kurtosis imaging in the glioma molecular classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁共振扩散峰度成像在胶质瘤分子分类中的诊断及预测性能:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1543619. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1543619. eCollection 2025.
2
Diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with molecular markers as a comprehensive approach to predict overall survival in patients with gliomas.弥散峰度成像联合分子标志物综合预测脑胶质瘤患者总生存期
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jul;128:108985. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108985. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
Diffusion kurtosis imaging histogram parameter metrics predicting survival in integrated molecular subtypes of diffuse glioma: An observational cohort study.弥散峰度成像直方图参数预测弥漫性胶质瘤整合分子亚型生存:观察性队列研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar;112:144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging.利用扩散峰度成像对人脑胶质瘤进行体内分子剖析
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jan;131(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2272-0. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
Glioma Grade Discrimination with MR Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.基于磁共振扩散峰度成像的脑胶质瘤分级诊断:一项诊断准确性的 Meta 分析。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):119-127. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171315. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in WHO grade II glioma by diffusion kurtosis imaging.基于扩散峰度成像预测世界卫生组织二级胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变状态
Pol J Radiol. 2024 Dec 20;89:e566-e572. doi: 10.5114/pjr/195521. eCollection 2024.
7
Diagnostic performance between MR amide proton transfer (APT) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in glioma grading and IDH mutation status prediction at 3 T.3T 下磁共振酰胺质子转移(APT)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)在胶质瘤分级和 IDH 突变状态预测中的诊断性能。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jan;134:109466. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109466. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Comparative analysis of the diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in grading gliomas, predicting tumour cell proliferation and IDH-1 gene mutation status.对比分析扩散峰度成像和扩散张量成像在胶质瘤分级、预测肿瘤细胞增殖和 IDH-1 基因突变状态中的作用。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Jan;141(1):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03025-7. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
The T2-FLAIR-mismatch sign as an imaging biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q status in diffuse low-grade gliomas: a systematic review with a Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic test performance.T2-FLAIR 错配征象作为弥漫性低级别胶质瘤 IDH 和 1p/19q 状态的影像学生物标志物:一项基于贝叶斯方法评估诊断试验性能的系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Dec 1;47(6):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19660.
10
Applying MAP-MRI to Identify the WHO Grade and Main Genetic Features of Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas: A Comparison of Three Diffusion-weighted MRI Models.应用 MAP-MRI 识别成人弥漫性胶质瘤的 WHO 分级和主要遗传特征:三种弥散加权 MRI 模型的比较。
Acad Radiol. 2023 Jul;30(7):1238-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of multiparametric nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in grading glioma and correlating IDH mutation status.多参数非增强磁共振成像(MRI)在胶质瘤分级及与异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变状态相关性判断中的诊断效能
Clin Radiol. 2025 Mar;82:106791. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.106791. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Incorporation of Edited MRS into Clinical Practice May Improve Care of Patients with -Mutant Glioma.将编辑后的磁共振波谱分析纳入临床实践可能会改善携带突变的胶质瘤患者的护理。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jan 8;46(1):113-120. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8413.
3
Glioma.
胶质瘤。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 May 9;10(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00516-y.
4
Clinical Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Diffuse Glioma: Insights Into Histological Grading and Classification.弥散性胶质瘤的磁共振波谱和弥散加权成像的临床评估:对组织学分级和分类的深入了解。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024 Nov;75(4):868-877. doi: 10.1177/08465371241238917. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
5
Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted-prognostic factors, standard of care and chemotherapy, and future perspectives with neoadjuvant strategy.少突胶质细胞瘤,IDH 突变和 1p/19q 共缺失的预后因素、标准治疗和化疗,以及新辅助策略的未来前景。
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2024 Apr;41(2):43-49. doi: 10.1007/s10014-024-00480-1. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Tumor Multiregional Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) Features in Evaluating Gliomas-A Comparative Study With Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI).肿瘤多区域平均表观扩散系数(MAP)特征在胶质瘤评估中的应用——与扩散峰度成像(DKI)的比较研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1532-1546. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29202. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
7
Diffusion along the perivascular space as a potential biomarker for glioma grading and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation status prediction.沿血管周围间隙扩散作为胶质瘤分级和异柠檬酸脱氢酶1突变状态预测的潜在生物标志物。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):8259-8273. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-541. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
8
DKI can distinguish high-grade gliomas from IDH1-mutant low-grade gliomas and correlate with their different nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio: a localized biopsy-based study.DKI 可区分高级别胶质瘤和 IDH1 突变型低级别胶质瘤,并与其不同的核浆比相关:一项基于局部活检的研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov;34(11):7539-7551. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10325-8. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
9
Diffusion heterogeneity and vascular perfusion in tumor and peritumoral areas for prediction of overall survival in patients with high-grade glioma.肿瘤和肿瘤周围区域的扩散异质性和血管灌注预测高级别胶质瘤患者的总生存期。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Dec;104:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
10
A pilot study: Metabolic profiling of plasma and saliva samples from newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.一项初步研究:对新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤患者的血浆和唾液样本进行代谢组学分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11427-11437. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5857. Epub 2023 Apr 9.