Bea Sungho, Iyer Geetha S, Kim Dae Hyun, Lin Kueiyu Joshua, Zhang Yichi, Zakoul Heidi, Tesfaye Helen, Bykov Katsiaryna
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1109.
Over the past decade, there has been a considerable shift in the use of pharmacologic agents for venous thromboembolism (VTE), with direct oral anticoagulants replacing warfarin as the drugs of choice for VTE recurrence prevention; however, evidence from head-to-head comparison studies remains limited.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of 3 common oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin) in patients with VTE.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study used Medicare and 2 commercial insurance databases from 2016 up to 2024 to identify patients 18 years and older who initiated an oral anticoagulant following VTE and had at least 1 year of continuous insurance enrollment before the index date.
Initiation of apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin within 30 days after VTE discharge.
The primary effectiveness outcome was hospitalization for recurrent VTE. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients were followed up from treatment initiation until outcome occurrence, treatment discontinuation/switch, disenrollment, death, or end of available data. Propensity score-matching weights were used to adjust for confounding. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models estimated weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.
Among 163 593 eligible individuals (mean [SD] age, 71.4 [13.5] years; 56.7% female), 58.5% initiated apixaban, 25.7% initiated rivaroxaban, and 15.8% initiated warfarin. Overall, 3270 hospitalizations for recurrent VTE and 4229 hospitalizations for bleeding events occurred. Compared with warfarin, patients taking apixaban (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.75) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87) had a lower risk of recurrent VTE. Apixaban showed a further decrease in risk compared with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96). Patients taking apixaban also had a lower risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75). No difference in bleeding risk was observed between rivaroxaban and warfarin (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12). These findings were consistent across subgroups defined by age, sex, cancer, chronic kidney disease, bleeding history, and frailty.
In this cohort study of patients with VTE who initiated an oral anticoagulant, apixaban was associated with a lower risk of VTE recurrence and major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban and warfarin. These results provide evidence to guide the selection of appropriate initial oral anticoagulant regimens for adult patients with VTE.
在过去十年中,用于静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的药物使用发生了相当大的转变,直接口服抗凝剂已取代华法林成为预防VTE复发的首选药物;然而,头对头比较研究的证据仍然有限。
比较3种常见口服抗凝剂(阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和华法林)在VTE患者中的有效性和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了医疗保险和2个商业保险数据库,时间跨度从2016年到2024年,以识别18岁及以上在VTE后开始使用口服抗凝剂且在索引日期前至少有1年连续参保记录的患者。
VTE出院后30天内开始使用阿哌沙班、利伐沙班或华法林。
主要有效性结局是复发性VTE住院。主要安全性结局是大出血。对患者从治疗开始进行随访,直至出现结局、治疗中断/换药、退保、死亡或可用数据结束。倾向评分匹配权重用于调整混杂因素。加权Cox比例风险模型估计加权风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。
在163593名符合条件的个体中(平均[标准差]年龄为71.4[13.5]岁;56.7%为女性),58.5%开始使用阿哌沙班,25.7%开始使用利伐沙班,15.8%开始使用华法林。总体而言,发生了3270例复发性VTE住院和4229例出血事件住院。与华法林相比,服用阿哌沙班(HR,0.67;95%CI,0.61 - 0.75)和利伐沙班(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.69 - 0.87)的患者复发性VTE风险较低。与利伐沙班相比,阿哌沙班的风险进一步降低(HR,0.87;95%CI,0.78 - 0.96)。与华法林(HR,0.70;95%CI,0.64 - 0.76)和利伐沙班(HR,0.69;95%CI,0.63 - 0.75)相比,服用阿哌沙班的患者大出血风险也较低。在利伐沙班和华法林之间未观察到出血风险差异(HR,1.02;95%CI,0.92 - 1.12)。这些发现在按年龄、性别、癌症、慢性肾病、出血史和虚弱程度定义的亚组中是一致的。
在这项对开始使用口服抗凝剂的VTE患者的队列研究中,与利伐沙班和华法林相比,阿哌沙班与较低的VTE复发风险和大出血风险相关。这些结果为指导成年VTE患者选择合适的初始口服抗凝剂方案提供了证据。