Skinner Scott
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2024;58(4):67-71. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-58.4.67. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
The processes of evaluating and selecting health technologies in hospitals have been extensively explored. However, few studies have been specific to U.S. hospitals, and none has approached the subject from the perspective of clinical engineering (CE)/healthcare technology management (HTM) professionals. This study specifically explored the intraorganizational phenomenon of how electronic medical equipment (EME) is evaluated and selected in U.S. hospitals from the perspective of CE/HTM professionals. The study was qualitative, incorporating semistructured interviews conducted with 10 CE/HTM professionals. Interviews were carried out via Internet conferencing and recorded. The recordings were transcribed and the transcripts analyzed using the constant comparative method and grounded theory. Participants were able to describe details of the intraorganizational processes used to evaluate and select EME within their hospitals. Themes that emerged included coronavirus disease 2019 impact, growing influence over time, multidisciplinary committees, negative outcomes, organizational factors, and process definition/exceptions. This study found a variety of recurring themes associated with the evaluation and selection processes for EME from the perspective of CE/HTM professionals in U.S. hospitals. Participants had varying degrees of power and influence with the processes. The themes may inform CE/HTM professionals seeking to grow their involvement with such processes.
医院评估和选择医疗技术的过程已得到广泛探讨。然而,针对美国医院的具体研究较少,且没有研究从临床工程(CE)/医疗技术管理(HTM)专业人员的角度探讨这一主题。本研究从CE/HTM专业人员的角度,具体探讨了美国医院如何评估和选择电子医疗设备(EME)的组织内部现象。该研究为定性研究,对10名CE/HTM专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈通过互联网会议进行并录音。对录音进行转录,并使用持续比较法和扎根理论对转录文本进行分析。参与者能够描述其医院内部用于评估和选择EME的组织流程细节。出现的主题包括2019冠状病毒病的影响、随着时间推移影响力不断增强、多学科委员会、负面结果、组织因素以及流程定义/例外情况。本研究从美国医院CE/HTM专业人员的角度发现了与EME评估和选择过程相关的各种反复出现的主题。参与者在这些过程中拥有不同程度的权力和影响力。这些主题可能会为寻求更多参与此类过程的CE/HTM专业人员提供参考。