• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review.基于本地/医院的卫生技术评估(HTA)的效果与影响:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;3:129. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-129.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Technology Assessment in U.S. Hospitals: A Qualitative Study.美国医院的卫生技术评估:一项定性研究。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2024;58(4):67-71. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-58.4.67. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
An evidence-based care program in a local healthcare setting in Brazil: Experience and impact.巴西当地医疗机构的循证护理项目:经验与影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 16;80:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100640. eCollection 2025.
3
Hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区基于医院的卫生技术评估:一项范围综述。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Jan 13;49:e8. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.8. eCollection 2025.
4
Overcoming Barriers in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA): International Expert Panel Consensus.克服医院健康技术评估(HB-HTA)中的障碍:国际专家小组共识
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;12(9):889. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090889.
5
UHC in Morocco: a bottom-up estimation of public hospitals' financing size based on a costing database.摩洛哥的全民健康覆盖:基于成本核算数据库对公立医院融资规模的自下而上估计
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00501-x.
6
Using the Dynamic SWOT Analysis to Assess Options for Implementing the HB-HTA Model.运用动态 SWOT 分析评估实施 HB-HTA 模型的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127281.
7
Cost Analysis of Selected Radiotherapeutic Modalities for Prostate Cancer Treatment-Czech Republic Case Study for the Purposes of Hospital Based HTA.前列腺癌治疗中选定放射治疗方式的成本分析——基于医院卫生技术评估目的的捷克共和国案例研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;9(1):98. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010098.
8
Estimating Health Cost Repartition Among Diseases in the Presence of Multimorbidity.在存在多种疾病的情况下估算疾病间的健康成本分配
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 3;6:2333392819891005. doi: 10.1177/2333392819891005. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
9
Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards.128项医疗质量机制综述:卫生系统管理者的框架与映射
Health Policy. 2020 Jan;124(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
10
Hospital staff perspectives towards health technology assessment: data from a multidisciplinary survey.医院工作人员对健康技术评估的看法:多学科调查数据。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 23;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0469-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in university hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: learning from international experience.基于医院的卫生技术评估在大学医院中的创新医疗器械评估以及医院药师的作用:借鉴国际经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Apr;29(2):185-91. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000019. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
2
Assessing the impact of health technology assessment on the Austrian healthcare system.评估卫生技术评估对奥地利医疗体系的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):84-91. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000748. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
3
The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.卫生技术评估报告对奥地利决策的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000729. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
4
New technologies and surgical innovation: five years of a local health technology assessment program in a surgical department.
Surg Innov. 2012 Jun;19(2):187-99. doi: 10.1177/1553350611421916. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
5
Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care.基于医院的比较效果研究中心:将研究转化为实践,以提高患者护理的质量、安全性和价值。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1352-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1476-9. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
6
Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies.将本地数据纳入基于医院的医疗技术评估:两个案例研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Jul;26(3):294-300. doi: 10.1017/S0266462310000334.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
8
History of health technology assessment in Sweden.瑞典卫生技术评估的历史。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:42-52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090412. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
9
Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: a new concept of decision support in health care?在医院开展小型健康技术评估:医疗保健决策支持的新概念?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):295-301. doi: 10.1017/s0266462306051178.
10
[Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen].[哥本哈根大学医院引入新医疗技术时对使用决策支持方法的态度]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 May 22;168(21):2069-74.

基于本地/医院的卫生技术评估(HTA)的效果与影响:一项系统综述

Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review.

作者信息

Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Desmartis Marie, Poder Thomas, Witteman William

机构信息

Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, 10 rue de l'Espinay, D6-726 Quebec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;3:129. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-129.

DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-3-129
PMID:25352182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4218945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly performed at the local or hospital level where the costs, impacts, and benefits of health technologies can be directly assessed. Although local/hospital-based HTA has been implemented for more than two decades in some jurisdictions, little is known about its effects and impact on hospital budget, clinical practices, and patient outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review that aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the effects and impact of local/hospital-based HTA.

METHODS

We identified articles through PubMed and Embase and by citation tracking of included studies. We selected qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies with empirical data about the effects or impact of local/hospital-based HTA on decision-making, budget, or perceptions of stakeholders. We extracted the following information from included studies: country, methodological approach, and use of conceptual framework; local/hospital HTA approach and activities described; reported effects and impacts of local/hospital-based HTA; factors facilitating/hampering the use of hospital-based HTA recommendations; and perceptions of stakeholders concerning local/hospital HTA. Due to the great heterogeneity among studies, we conducted a narrative synthesis of their results.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. We reported the results according to the four approaches for performing HTA proposed by the Hospital Based HTA Interest Sub-Group: ambassador model, mini-HTA, internal committee, and HTA unit. Results showed that each of these approaches for performing HTA corresponds to specific needs and structures and has its strengths and limitations. Overall, studies showed positive impacts related to local/hospital-based HTA on hospital decisions and budgets, as well as positive perceptions from managers and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Local/hospital-based HTA could influence decision-making on several aspects. It is difficult to evaluate the real impacts of local HTA at the different levels of health care given the relatively small number of evaluations with quantitative data and the lack of clear comparators. Further research is necessary to explore the conditions under which local/hospital-based HTA results and recommendations can impact hospital policies, clinical decisions, and quality of care and optimize the use of scarce resources.

摘要

背景

卫生技术评估(HTA)越来越多地在地方或医院层面开展,在此层面可以直接评估卫生技术的成本、影响和效益。尽管基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估在一些辖区已经实施了二十多年,但对于其对医院预算、临床实践和患者结局的影响知之甚少。我们开展了一项混合方法的系统评价,旨在综合关于基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估的影响和作用的现有证据。

方法

我们通过PubMed和Embase以及对纳入研究的引文追踪来识别文章。我们选择了定性、定量或混合方法的研究,这些研究具有关于基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估对决策、预算或利益相关者认知的影响的实证数据。我们从纳入研究中提取了以下信息:国家、方法学方法以及概念框架的使用;所描述的地方/医院卫生技术评估方法和活动;基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估报告的影响和作用;促进/阻碍使用医院卫生技术评估建议的因素;以及利益相关者对地方/医院卫生技术评估的认知。由于研究之间存在很大的异质性,我们对其结果进行了叙述性综合。

结果

共有18项研究符合纳入标准。我们根据医院卫生技术评估兴趣小组提出的进行卫生技术评估的四种方法报告了结果:大使模式、小型卫生技术评估、内部委员会和卫生技术评估单位。结果表明,这些进行卫生技术评估的方法各自对应特定的需求和结构,并且有其优点和局限性。总体而言,研究表明基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估对医院决策和预算有积极影响,并且管理者和临床医生也有积极的认知。

结论

基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估可能在多个方面影响决策。鉴于定量数据的评估数量相对较少且缺乏明确的对照,很难评估地方卫生技术评估在不同医疗保健层面的实际影响。有必要进一步开展研究,以探索在何种条件下基于地方/医院的卫生技术评估结果和建议能够影响医院政策、临床决策和医疗质量,并优化稀缺资源的利用。