Corva Santiago Gerardo, Dominguez German Ariel, Sanchez Javier, de la Sota Rodolfo Luzbel
Instituto de Investigaciones en Reproducción Animal (INIRA), Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, BA, Argentina B1900AVW.
Private practice, Venado Tuerto, SF, Argentina S2600GOZ.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jul;108(7):7415-7427. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24924. Epub 2025 May 10.
The study aimed to describe pregnancy losses within the same lactation in a large commercial dairy herd in Argentina. A retrospective study was completed using 25,019 lactation records from 11,263 cows with at least 1 artificial insemination-declared pregnant (AIDP) by ultrasound at 28 to 42 d post AI. Each AIDP was identified according to the corresponding parity number, which was sequentially numbered and related to a pregnancy number within the same lactation. In each lactation, the uterine health events (UTE), retention of fetal membranes, puerperal metritis, and clinical endometritis, as well as the nonuterine health events (NUTE), clinical mastitis, and clinical lameness were recorded. The health status for each lactation was categorized according to the site of inflammation, such as healthy cows, cows with UTE, cows with NUTE records, and cows with both UTE and NUTE. Pregnancy loss was defined by: (1) detection of heat with blue paint rubbed off after having been previously diagnosed pregnant and subsequently diagnosed open by ultrasound at the next herd visit 14 d later; (2) observed abortion; or (3) diagnosis open by ultrasound pregnancy diagnosis 5 mo after AI of pregnancy to reconfirm pregnancy status. The occurrence of pregnancy loss was reported for the whole study period and 21-d periods. The risk of pregnancy loss was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model that included parity number, AIDP, season, health status, DIM to AIDP, and daily milk production to AIDP as covariates. Herd persistence was used to assess the risk of cows leaving the herd before the next lactation due to pregnancy loss, with the last pregnancy within each lactation, parity number, and pregnancy loss as covariates. The occurrence of pregnancy loss was 22.5%; the occurrence of pregnancy loss per 21 d was 3.7%. The median day of gestation and median DIM for the first, second, and third pregnancy losses were 98, 108, 121 d and 224, 394, and 552 d, respectively. Cows with UTE diseases had a higher hazard of pregnancy loss than healthy cows (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.13-1.36); conversely, cows in second or third parity did not have a higher hazard of pregnancy loss than first parity cows (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.95-1.11; HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08; respectively). Similarly, cows with 2 and 3 AIDP had a lower hazard of pregnancy loss than cows with only 1 AIDP (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, respectively). Cows with AIDP in fall and winter had a lower HR of pregnancy loss than those with AIDP in summer (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89). In conclusion, health events during lactation affect pregnancy loss within the same lactation and herd persistence to the next lactation in dairy cows. The risk of pregnancy losses within a lactation may not increase with parity number and higher AIDP, but conversely, it may increase with higher milk production (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02; 1%/1 kg increase in test-day milk yield closest to the AIDP).
该研究旨在描述阿根廷一个大型商业化奶牛场同一泌乳期内的妊娠损失情况。通过对11263头奶牛的25019条泌乳记录进行回顾性研究,这些奶牛在人工授精后28至42天经超声检查至少有1次人工授精确诊怀孕(AIDP)。每个AIDP根据相应的胎次编号进行识别,胎次依次编号,并与同一泌乳期内的妊娠编号相关。在每个泌乳期,记录子宫健康事件(UTE)、胎膜滞留、产后子宫内膜炎和临床子宫内膜炎,以及非子宫健康事件(NUTE)、临床乳腺炎和临床跛行。每个泌乳期的健康状况根据炎症部位进行分类,如健康奶牛、患有UTE的奶牛、有NUTE记录的奶牛以及同时患有UTE和NUTE的奶牛。妊娠损失的定义为:(1)在先前诊断怀孕后,下次牛群检查时发现蓝色标记擦掉且经超声检查确诊未怀孕;(2)观察到流产;或(3)人工授精后5个月经超声妊娠诊断确诊未怀孕以重新确认妊娠状态。报告了整个研究期间和21天时间段内妊娠损失的发生情况。使用Cox比例风险模型分析妊娠损失风险,该模型将胎次编号、AIDP、季节、健康状况、授精后天数(DIM)至AIDP以及授精后日均产奶量作为协变量。畜群持续性用于评估由于妊娠损失导致奶牛在下一个泌乳期前离开畜群的风险,将每个泌乳期内的最后一次妊娠、胎次编号和妊娠损失作为协变量。妊娠损失的发生率为22.5%;每21天妊娠损失的发生率为3.7%。第一次、第二次和第三次妊娠损失的妊娠中位数天数和DIM中位数分别为98天、108天、121天和224天、394天、552天。患有UTE疾病的奶牛比健康奶牛有更高的妊娠损失风险(风险比[HR] 1.24,95%置信区间1.13 - 1.36);相反,第二胎或第三胎奶牛的妊娠损失风险并不高于第一胎奶牛(HR 1.03,95%置信区间0.95 - 1.11;HR 1.00,95%置信区间0.92 - 1.08)。同样,有2次和3次AIDP的奶牛比只有1次AIDP的奶牛妊娠损失风险更低(HR 0.90,95%置信区间0.83 - 0.97;HR 0.92,95%置信区间0.85 - 0.99)。秋季和冬季有AIDP的奶牛比夏季有AIDP的奶牛妊娠损失风险更低(HR 0.84,95%置信区间0.77 - 0.91;HR 0.82,95%置信区间0.75 - 0.89)。总之,泌乳期的健康事件会影响同一泌乳期内的妊娠损失以及奶牛到下一个泌乳期的畜群持续性。泌乳期内妊娠损失的风险可能不会随着胎次编号和更高的AIDP而增加,但相反,可能会随着更高的产奶量而增加(HR 1.02,95%置信区间1.01 - 1.02;最接近AIDP的测定日产奶量每增加1千克增加1%)。