Suppr超能文献

抗反流婴儿配方奶粉与抗酸药物:匹配还是不匹配?

Anti-regurgitation infant formulas and antacid medication: match or mismatch?

作者信息

Tommelein Eline, Baert Kyara, Ombecq Mathieu, Henry Silke, Vanhoorne Valérie

机构信息

Experimental Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090, Jette, Belgium.

Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2025 May 13;184(6):336. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06161-1.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

A perceived need for treatment has led to the development and widespread marketing of various anti-regurgitation (AR) infant formulas, promoted as effective solutions for managing regurgitation symptoms. For practice, limited comparative data exists on the specific thickening agents, or the relative thicknesses of AR formulas. An added concern is that some infants on AR formulas simultaneously receive pharmacological treatments for reflux, such as antacids or gastric acid inhibitors, and no information about compatibility is available. One reference formula (Nutrilon® Profutura 1, Nutricia) and four formulas labelled as 'anti-regurgitation' with different nutritional compositions were used to evaluate the effect of pH and time on viscosity. The viscosity of marketed AR formulas was tested with a rotational rheometer. All four AR formulas demonstrated higher viscosity compared to the reference formula, with notable differences based on the thickening strategy used by the manufacturer. Pre-thickened CBG-based AR formulas generally showed higher viscosity than pre-thickened starch-based formulas. Adding a casein-dominant protein fraction increased viscosity in acidic environments; however, this effect gradually diminished over time, likely due to protein hydrolysis. Moderate (pH 4) compared to strong acidic conditions (pH 1) had only minimal impact on viscosity, indicating compatibility with gastric acid inhibitors across all AR formulas.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that CBG-based AR formulas should be allowed to stand for at least 30 min after preparation to achieve the intended viscosity. Additionally, AR formulas thickened with CBG generally exhibit higher viscosity than pre-thickened starch-based formulas. Notably, casein-based thickening occurs even when gastric acid suppressants are used, and combining casein with acid suppression may even slow down the rate of viscosity reduction over time.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Commercially available infant formula sometimes uses thickening agents to reduce regurgitation, but their effectiveness may vary depending on composition and gastric conditions. • Some thickening agents require an acidic environment to activate, which may be compromised by concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants.

WHAT IS NEW

• This study demonstrates that CBG-based AR formulas generally maintain higher viscosity than starch-based formulas, even with acid suppression. • Viscosity in some formulas changes over time, indicating that preparation timing affects therapeutic consistency.

摘要

未标注

对治疗的感知需求促使各种抗反流(AR)婴儿配方奶粉得以开发并广泛销售,这些产品被宣传为管理反流症状的有效解决方案。在实际应用中,关于特定增稠剂或AR配方奶粉相对稠度的比较数据有限。另一个令人担忧的问题是,一些食用AR配方奶粉的婴儿同时接受抗反流的药物治疗,如抗酸剂或胃酸抑制剂,且目前尚无关于兼容性的信息。使用一种参考配方奶粉(Nutrilon® Profutura 1,纽迪希亚公司)和四种标注为“抗反流”且营养成分不同的配方奶粉来评估pH值和时间对粘度的影响。使用旋转流变仪测试市售AR配方奶粉的粘度。与参考配方奶粉相比,所有四种AR配方奶粉的粘度都更高,根据制造商使用的增稠策略存在显著差异。预增稠的基于羧甲基纤维素钠(CBG)的AR配方奶粉通常比预增稠的基于淀粉的配方奶粉显示出更高的粘度。添加以酪蛋白为主的蛋白质部分会增加酸性环境中的粘度;然而,随着时间的推移,这种效果会逐渐减弱,可能是由于蛋白质水解。与强酸性条件(pH 1)相比,中度酸性条件(pH 4)对粘度的影响最小,表明所有AR配方奶粉与胃酸抑制剂具有兼容性。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,基于CBG的AR配方奶粉制备后应至少静置30分钟以达到预期粘度。此外,用CBG增稠的AR配方奶粉通常比预增稠的基于淀粉的配方奶粉表现出更高的粘度。值得注意的是,即使使用胃酸抑制剂,基于酪蛋白的增稠仍会发生,并且酪蛋白与抑酸剂联合使用甚至可能减缓粘度随时间降低的速率。

已知信息

• 市售婴儿配方奶粉有时使用增稠剂来减少反流,但其有效性可能因成分和胃部状况而异。• 一些增稠剂需要酸性环境来激活,同时使用胃酸抑制剂可能会破坏这种环境。

新发现

• 本研究表明,即使使用抑酸剂,基于CBG的AR配方奶粉通常比基于淀粉的配方奶粉保持更高的粘度。• 一些配方奶粉的粘度会随时间变化,表明制备时间会影响治疗的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验