Suppr超能文献

外科临床实践指南的传播——评估美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会的传播策略

The dissemination of surgical clinical practice guidelines-evaluating SAGES' strategies for distribution.

作者信息

Calabrese Elisa C, Slater Bethany J, Babidge Wendy, Sylla Patricia, Maddern Guy

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco-East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11778-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has been a leader in the development of surgical clinical practice guidelines; however, the dissemination and implementation of these remains a challenge. We aim to analyze the user interaction with the SAGES website (sages.org) guidelines' page and guideline downloads from their associated journal Surgical Endoscopy to help inform the organization about its distribution and dissemination methods.

METHODS

Google analytics from the sages.org website and Surgical Endoscopy downloads for each guideline were obtained from July 2023 to April 2024, as well as number of downloads for the lifetime of the guideline. Data were organized by overall guideline popularity, defined as number of sages.org views or number of journal downloads, and its associated citations. Popularity by country was only informed by google analytics data from sages.org. The country's associated economic status-high, upper middle, lower middle, and low-income was obtained and a chi-squared test, applied to proportions, was performed on each guideline to determine if the economic status of the country significantly influences guideline popularity (p-value less than 0.05, confidence interval 95%).

RESULTS

The hiatal hernia guideline had the most sages.org views and citations over the 9-month period; however, the management of diverticulitis guideline had the most journal downloads from time of publication. Colorectal surgery (CRS) guidelines were the most popular category in journal downloads which was not observed in sages.org views. Additionally, the popularity significantly differed in four guidelines based on the country's economic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Society websites and journals were found to be reasonable platforms for dissemination of guidelines, with viewership and download numbers in the tens of thousands for some articles. The variability in engagement across platforms may suggest different audiences with different needs. The data emphasizes the importance of SAGES diversifying their platforms for broader dissemination.

摘要

背景

胃肠与内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)一直是外科临床实践指南制定的引领者;然而,这些指南的传播与实施仍是一项挑战。我们旨在分析用户与SAGES网站(sages.org)指南页面的互动情况,以及从其关联期刊《外科内镜》下载指南的情况,以帮助该组织了解其分发和传播方式。

方法

获取了2023年7月至2024年4月sages.org网站的谷歌分析数据以及各指南在《外科内镜》上的下载量,还有指南发布以来的累计下载量。数据按总体指南受欢迎程度进行整理,总体指南受欢迎程度定义为sages.org网站的浏览量或期刊下载量及其相关引用次数。仅根据sages.org的谷歌分析数据了解各国的受欢迎程度。获取各国相应的经济状况(高收入、中高收入、中低收入和低收入),并对每个指南进行卡方检验(应用于比例),以确定国家的经济状况是否对指南受欢迎程度有显著影响(p值小于0.05,置信区间95%)。

结果

在9个月期间,食管裂孔疝指南在sages.org网站上的浏览量和引用次数最多;然而,憩室炎管理指南自发布以来在期刊上的下载量最多。结直肠手术(CRS)指南是期刊下载中最受欢迎的类别,而在sages.org网站浏览量中未观察到这一情况。此外,根据国家经济状况,四项指南的受欢迎程度存在显著差异。

结论

发现协会网站和期刊是传播指南的合理平台,部分文章的浏览量和下载量达数万次。各平台参与度的差异可能表明受众不同,需求也不同。数据强调了SAGES使平台多样化以实现更广泛传播的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验