• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胃肠内镜外科学会指南制定:标准操作程序的健康公平更新。

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Hiram C. Polk, Jr. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2315-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10809-8. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10809-8
PMID:38575829
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The SAGES Guidelines Committee creates evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Due to existing health disparities, recommendations made in these guidelines may have different impacts on different populations. The updates to our standard operating procedure described herein will allow us to produce well-designed guidelines that take these disparities into account and potentially reduce health inequities.

METHODS

This paper outlines updates to the SAGES Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure in order to incorporate issues of heath equity into our guideline development process with the goal of minimizing downstream health disparities.

RESULTS

SAGES has developed an evidence-based, standardized approach to consider issues of health equity throughout the guideline development process to allow physicians to better counsel patients and make research recommendations to better address disparities.

CONCLUSION

Societies that promote guidelines within their organization must make an intentional effort to prevent the widening of health disparities as a result of their recommendations. The updates to the Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure will hopefully lead to increased attention to these disparities and provide specific recommendations to reduce them.

摘要

简介

SAGES 指南委员会制定基于证据的临床实践指南。由于现有的健康差距,这些指南中的建议可能对不同人群产生不同的影响。本文所述的标准操作程序更新将使我们能够制定出考虑到这些差异并有可能减少健康不平等的精心设计的指南。

方法

本文概述了 SAGES 指南委员会标准操作程序的更新,以便将健康公平问题纳入我们的指南制定过程,目标是最大限度地减少下游健康差距。

结果

SAGES 已经开发了一种基于证据的标准化方法,以在整个指南制定过程中考虑健康公平问题,使医生能够更好地为患者提供咨询,并提出研究建议,以更好地解决差异问题。

结论

在其组织内推动指南的社团必须有意努力防止由于其建议而导致健康差距的扩大。指南委员会标准操作程序的更新有望引起对这些差异的更多关注,并提供减少这些差异的具体建议。

相似文献

1
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure.美国胃肠内镜外科学会指南制定:标准操作程序的健康公平更新。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2315-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10809-8. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: Clinical Practice Guideline Update Standard Operating Procedure.美国胃肠与内镜外科医师学会指南制定:临床实践指南更新标准操作程序
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):716-720. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11525-7. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
3
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: patient engagement update to standard operating procedure.美国胃肠和内镜外科医师学会指南制定:患者参与标准操作程序的更新
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):687-690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11530-w. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
4
Leaning in and moving forward: a call to action and review of diversity initiatives in SAGES.倾斜并前进:SAGES 多样性倡议的行动呼吁和回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4095-4103. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10814-x. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines development: standard operating procedure.美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会 (SAGES) 指南制定:标准操作程序。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2417-2427. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08469-z. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Considering health equity when moving from evidence-based guideline recommendations to implementation: a case study from an upper-middle income country on the GRADE approach.在从循证指南推荐转向实施时考虑健康公平性:一个中上收入国家应用 GRADE 方法的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(10):1484-1490. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx126.
8
Addressing Cancer Disparities in SGM Populations: Recommendations for a National Action Plan to Increase SGM Health Equity Through Researcher and Provider Training and Education.解决性取向和性别认同少数群体中的癌症差异:通过研究人员和医疗服务提供者培训与教育提高性取向和性别认同少数群体健康公平性的国家行动计划建议。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):44-53. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1438-1.
9
Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0.《EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM 联合实践指南/程序标准:在实体瘤患者接受免疫调节治疗期间推荐使用 [F]FDG PET/CT 成像(第 1.0 版)》
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jun;49(7):2323-2341. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05780-2. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.美国结直肠外科医师学会和美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会发布的结肠和直肠手术后加速康复临床实践指南。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):5-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The dissemination of surgical clinical practice guidelines-evaluating SAGES' strategies for distribution.外科临床实践指南的传播——评估美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会的传播策略
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11778-2.
2
Early readmission after adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. A retrospective study.嗜铬细胞瘤肾上腺切除术后的早期再入院:一项回顾性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 May 8;410(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03719-3.
3
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: Clinical Practice Guideline Update Standard Operating Procedure.

本文引用的文献

1
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) guidelines development: standard operating procedure.美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会 (SAGES) 指南制定:标准操作程序。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2417-2427. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08469-z. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
3
Racial Disparities in Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Psychosocial Stress.
美国胃肠与内镜外科医师学会指南制定:临床实践指南更新标准操作程序
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):716-720. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11525-7. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
4
Side-specific factors for intraoperative hemodynamic instability in laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a comparative study.腹腔镜嗜铬细胞瘤切除术术中血流动力学不稳定的侧别相关因素:一项对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4571-4582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10974-w. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
种族差异与不良妊娠结局和心理社会压力。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):328-335. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002441.
4
GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process.GRADE公平性指南4:在GRADE指南制定过程中考虑健康公平性:证据到决策过程
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist.GRADE公平性指南2:在GRADE指南制定中考虑健康公平性:指南制定清单的公平性扩展
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale.GRADE公平性指南1:在GRADE指南制定过程中考虑健康公平性:引言与基本原理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence.GRADE公平性指南3:在GRADE指南制定过程中考虑健康公平性:对综合证据的确定性进行评级
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health.从公平视角看待干预措施:使用 PROGRESS 确保考虑到社会分层因素,以揭示健康方面的不平等现象。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation.提高研究证据在指南制定中的应用:16. 评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 8;4:28. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-28.
10
Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.医学伦理学:四项原则外加对范围的关注。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184.