• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应激性高血糖比值在2型糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者中的预后意义

Prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Ma Xiaoteng, Chu Huijun, Sun Yan, Cheng Yujing, Zhang Dai, Yang Lixia, Wang Zhijian, Liu Xiaoli, Zhou Yujie

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.

Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Thromb J. 2025 May 12;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00729-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12959-025-00729-5
PMID:40355885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12067665/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has not been well studied in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

We prospectively measured admission fasting blood glucose (AFBG) and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and retrospectively calculated the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR, = AFBG/[1.59 × HbA1c (%) - 2.59]) in 791 patients with T2DM and ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause mortality, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned repeat coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 61 ± 10 years, and 72.8% were male. Over a median follow-up of 927 days, 194 patients developed at least one primary endpoint event. The follow-up incidence of MACCE increased in parallel with SHR tertiles (15.6%, 21.9%, and 36.1%, respectively; P for trend < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for multiple confounding factors showed hazard ratios for MACCE of 1.525 (95% CI: 1.009-2.305; P = 0.045) for the middle tertile and 2.525 (95% CI: 1.729-3.687; P < 0.001) for the highest tertile of SHR, with the lowest tertile as the reference. The addition of SHR to the baseline reference prediction model improved model predictive performance markedly (C-statistic: increased from 0.704 to 0.721; cNRI: 0.176 [95% CI: 0.063-0.282], P = 0.002; IDI: 0.030 [95% CI: 0.009-0.063], P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

SHR was independently and significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM and ACS patients who underwent PCI, and had an incremental effect on the predictive ability of the baseline reference prediction model.

摘要

背景

应激性高血糖比值(SHR)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中的预后意义尚未得到充分研究。

方法

我们前瞻性地测量了791例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的T2DM合并ACS患者的入院空腹血糖(AFBG)和糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c),并回顾性计算了应激性高血糖比值(SHR,=AFBG/[1.59×HbA1c(%)-2.59])。主要终点定义为主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE),包括全因死亡率、非致命性卒中、非致命性心肌梗死和计划外再次冠状动脉血运重建。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为61±10岁,男性占72.8%。在中位随访927天期间,194例患者发生了至少1次主要终点事件。MACCE的随访发生率随SHR三分位数平行增加(分别为15.6%、21.9%和36.1%;趋势P<0.001)。经多个混杂因素校正的Cox比例风险回归分析显示,SHR中间三分位数的MACCE风险比为1.525(95%CI:1.009-2.305;P=0.045),最高三分位数为2.525(95%CI:1.729-3.687;P<0.001),以最低三分位数为参照。将SHR添加到基线参考预测模型中显著提高了模型的预测性能(C统计量:从0.704增加到0.721;cNRI:0.176[95%CI:0.063-0.282],P=0.002;IDI:0.030[95%CI:0.009-0.063],P=0.002)。

结论

SHR与接受PCI的T2DM合并ACS患者的不良心血管结局独立且显著相关,并且对基线参考预测模型的预测能力有增量作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/12067665/355e7aba4ebb/12959_2025_729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/12067665/d242efed6805/12959_2025_729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/12067665/355e7aba4ebb/12959_2025_729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/12067665/d242efed6805/12959_2025_729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/12067665/355e7aba4ebb/12959_2025_729_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndromes.应激性高血糖比值在2型糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者中的预后意义
Thromb J. 2025 May 12;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00729-5.
2
Prognostic implications of stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries.应激性高血糖比值对非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死患者预后的影响。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):990-999. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2186479.
3
Triglyceride glucose index for predicting cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome.三酰甘油葡萄糖指数预测 2 型糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心血管结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Mar 10;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01006-7.
4
Predictive value of the stress hyperglycemia ratio in dialysis patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from a multi-center observational study.透析患者急性冠状动脉综合征应激性高血糖比值的预测价值:一项多中心观察性研究的见解。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02036-7.
5
The stress hyperglycemia ratio, an index of relative hyperglycemia, as a predictor of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.应激性高血糖比值作为相对高血糖的一个指标,可作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的预测因子。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.065. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
6
Prognostic impact of the atherogenic index of plasma in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.载脂蛋白相关指数对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 2 型糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者预后的影响。
Lipids Health Dis. 2020 Nov 16;19(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12944-020-01418-0.
7
Combination of the glycated hemoglobin levels and prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic marker in patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.糖化血红蛋白水平与预后营养指数联合作为急性冠状动脉综合征合并 2 型糖尿病患者的预后标志物。
Lipids Health Dis. 2024 Jan 11;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01992-z.
8
Adjustment of the GRACE Risk Score by Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio Improves Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.通过单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白比值调整GRACE风险评分可改善接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者不良心血管结局的预测。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 26;8:755806. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.755806. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of various insulin resistance surrogates on prognostic prediction and stratification following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.比较 2 型糖尿病患者与非 2 型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不同胰岛素抵抗替代指标对预后预测和分层的作用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Sep 18;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01383-7.
10
Adjustment of the GRACE score by the triglyceride glucose index improves the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.三酰甘油葡萄糖指数对 GRACE 评分的校正可改善行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的预测。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Aug 5;21(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01582-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio as a Predictor of In-Hospital Stent Thrombosis in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.应激性高血糖比值作为接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内支架血栓形成的预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 26;61(7):1158. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071158.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting the impact of stress-induced hyperglycemia on in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective study.预测应激性高血糖对慢性肾脏病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院死亡率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2024 Dec;38(12):108895. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108895. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
The relative and combined ability of triglyceride-glucose index and stress hyperglycemia ratio to predict major adverse cardio-cerebral events in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数和应激性高血糖比值预测多支冠状动脉疾病患者主要不良心脑血管事件的相对及联合能力。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Sep 28;16(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01471-0.
3
Prognostic value of the stress-hyperglycaemia ratio in patients with moderate-to-severe coronary artery calcification: Insights from a large cohort study.中重度冠状动脉钙化患者应激-高血糖比值的预后价值:一项大型队列研究的新发现。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov;26(11):4933-4944. doi: 10.1111/dom.15894. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio with left ventricular function and microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance study.应激性高血糖比值与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室功能和微血管阻塞的关系:一项 3.0T 心脏磁共振研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 May 27;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02271-6.
5
Effects of the stress hyperglycemia ratio on long-term mortality in patients with triple-vessel disease and acute coronary syndrome.三血管病变合并急性冠脉综合征患者应激性高血糖比值对长期死亡率的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Apr 25;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02220-3.
6
The relative and combined ability of stress hyperglycemia ratio and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to predict all-cause mortality in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.应激性高血糖比值与N末端B型脑钠肽前体预测多支冠状动脉疾病糖尿病患者全因死亡率的相对及联合能力。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Mar 11;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02186-2.
7
Editorial commentary: Beyond coronary anatomy in acute myocardial infarction: Could stress hyperglycemia ratio be a new prognostic index and therapeutic target?编辑评论:急性心肌梗死中冠状动脉解剖之外:应激性高血糖比值能否成为新的预后指标和治疗靶点?
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct;34(7):466-467. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
8
Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review with Bayesian and frequentist meta-analysis.应激性高血糖比值对急性心肌梗死患者预后的预测价值:贝叶斯和频率主义荟萃分析的系统评价。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct;34(7):453-465. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Coronary physiology thresholds associated with microvascular obstruction in myocardial infarction.心肌梗死中与微血管阻塞相关的冠状动脉生理学阈值。
Heart. 2024 Jan 29;110(4):271-280. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323169.
10
Stress hyperglycemia ratio and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A multicenter, nationwide study.应激性高血糖比值与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期预后:一项多中心、全国性研究。
J Diabetes. 2023 Jul;15(7):557-568. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13400. Epub 2023 May 3.