Suppr超能文献

特定类型久坐行为与腰痛之间的关联:来自一项大规模队列研究的证据。

Associations Between Type-Specific Sedentary Behaviour and Low Back Pain: Evidence From a Large-Scale Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lee On, Park DooYong

机构信息

Department of Sport Science, Korea Institute of Sports Science, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70118. doi: 10.1002/msc.70118.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between different types of sedentary behaviour and the risk of low back pain (LBP) and LBP intensity.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a large-scale cohort survey of Koreans comprising 2742 participants. Sedentary behaviours-namely, TV viewing (TV-ST), squatting (Squat-ST), and floor (Floor-ST) sitting-were categorised into three groups (< 2 h, 2-4 h, and ≥ 4 h). LBP was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and multiple linear regression analyses were used to estimate β coefficients with 95% CI.

RESULTS

For TV-ST, after adjusting for all confounding variables, participants watching TV for 2-4 h and ≥ 4 h exhibited LBP risk ORs of 1.23 (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.50) and 1.44 (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.14-1.82), respectively, compared with those watching TV for less than 2 h. Similar results were observed for Squat-ST, with an OR of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.33-2.56) for 2-4 h and an OR of 4.14 (95% CI: 1.96-8.72) for ≥ 4 h. Furthermore, distinct associations were observed between sedentary behaviour types and LBP severity as measured by VAS and ODI scores.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the critical role of specific sedentary behaviours in the development and severity of LBP, underscoring the need for targeted interventions in its prevention and management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查不同类型的久坐行为与腰痛(LBP)风险及LBP强度之间的关联。

方法

数据来自一项对2742名韩国人的大规模队列调查。久坐行为,即看电视(TV-ST)、蹲坐(Squat-ST)和在地板上坐(Floor-ST),被分为三组(<2小时、2 - 4小时和≥4小时)。使用奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估腰痛情况。进行多元逻辑回归分析以计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),并使用多元线性回归分析来估计β系数及95% CI。

结果

对于TV-ST,在调整所有混杂变量后,与看电视少于2小时的参与者相比,看电视2 - 4小时和≥4小时的参与者出现LBP风险的OR分别为1.23(OR = 1.23,95% CI = 1.01 - 1.50)和1.44(OR = 1.44,95% CI = 1.14 - 1.82)。Squat-ST也观察到类似结果,2 - 4小时的OR为1.83(95% CI:1.33 - 2.56),≥4小时的OR为4.14(95% CI:1.96 - 8.72)。此外,通过VAS和ODI评分衡量,在久坐行为类型与LBP严重程度之间观察到了明显的关联。

结论

这些发现凸显了特定久坐行为在LBP发生和严重程度方面的关键作用,强调了在其预防和管理中进行针对性干预的必要性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Postural and spinal stability analysis for different floor sitting styles.不同坐姿的姿势与脊柱稳定性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 3;10(17):e37379. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37379. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验