Papavasiliou Evie, Marshall Jessica, Allan Louise, Bradbury Katherine, Fox Chris, Hawkes Matthew, Irvine Anne, Moniz-Cook Esme, Pick Aimee, Polley Marie, Rathbone Amy, Reeve Joanne, Robinson Dame Louise, Rook George, Sadler Euan, Wolverson Emma, Walker Sarah, Cross Jane
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70289. doi: 10.1111/hex.70289.
Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex needs, exacerbated by social isolation and difficulty accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) has been increasingly integrated into the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) as a means to connect individuals with non-clinical services to address these challenges. However, current research provides limited detail on specific SP interventions tailored to dementia care, leaving gaps in understanding the targeted needs, participation drivers, effectiveness and potential benefits for PLWD.
A complex intervention systematic review of SP in dementia care was performed in the United Kingdom using an iterative logic model approach. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching for reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough's Evidence of Framework. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist.
Forty-nine studies, reporting on PLWD, met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that SP for PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and lacks focus, reflecting the diverse demographics involved. Interventions encompass cognitive, educational, psychosocial, physical, community and complementary therapies, of inconsistent classification, with some being umbrella interventions and others standalone services. Provided by the NHS, charities and integrated services, SP involves a range of referrers and connectors. Finally, individual outcomes show benefits such as increased independence and improved mood, but challenges pertaining to suitability and logistical issues, whereas systemic outcomes include cost savings and better service delivery, despite high implementation costs.
SP pathways for PLWD are varied, with success relying heavily on adequately resourced and trained connectors. While benefits extend beyond health improvements, further research is needed to assess long-term impacts, refine mechanisms and standardise evaluation metrics for SP effectiveness in dementia care.
A PPI advisory group, consisting of a person living with dementia and a caregiver, was actively involved throughout the review process, providing insights into the review questions, the logic model, emerging findings and interpretation of results.
痴呆症是一种复杂的病症,给医疗保健系统和支持服务带来了重大挑战。患有痴呆症的人(PLWD)往往面临复杂的需求,而社会隔离和难以获得支持使这些需求更加恶化。社会处方(SP)已越来越多地融入英国国民健康服务体系(NHS),作为一种将个人与非临床服务联系起来以应对这些挑战的手段。然而,目前的研究对针对痴呆症护理的特定社会处方干预措施的细节描述有限,在了解PLWD的目标需求、参与驱动因素、有效性和潜在益处方面存在差距。
在英国采用迭代逻辑模型方法对痴呆症护理中的社会处方进行了一项复杂干预系统评价。检索了六个数据库和灰色文献,并通过手工检索纳入研究的参考文献列表进行补充。结果通过两步筛选过程进行筛选,随后进行数据提取。使用高夫证据框架评估偏倚风险。报告遵循系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-CI)扩展声明和清单。
四十九项报告PLWD情况的研究符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,英国针对PLWD的社会处方各不相同且缺乏重点,反映了所涉及的不同人口统计学特征。干预措施包括认知、教育、心理社会、身体、社区和补充疗法,分类不一致,有些是综合性干预措施,有些是独立服务。由NHS、慈善机构和综合服务提供,社会处方涉及一系列转诊者和联系者。最后,个体结果显示出如独立性增强和情绪改善等益处,但在适用性和后勤问题方面存在挑战,而系统结果包括成本节约和更好的服务提供,尽管实施成本很高。
PLWD的社会处方途径各不相同,成功很大程度上依赖于资源充足且经过培训的联系者。虽然益处不仅限于健康改善,但需要进一步研究来评估长期影响、完善机制并规范痴呆症护理中社会处方有效性的评估指标。
一个由一名痴呆症患者和一名护理人员组成的患者和公众参与咨询小组在整个评价过程中积极参与,对评价问题、逻辑模型、新出现的研究结果和结果解释提供了见解。