Waddington J L, Olley J E
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1977 Mar 23;52(1):93-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00426606.
The effects of chlordiazepoxide and atropine on the acquisition of passive avoidance learning in rats were compared in two superficially similar but theoretically distinct forms of the step down task in an attempt to dissociate behaviourally the disinhibiting effects of these two classes of drug. In a discrete trial procedure both chlordiazepoxide and atropine significantly retarded acquisition; on retention testing under saline treatment alone, the initial chlordiazepoxide group showed no change in behaviour while the initial atropine group showed a facilitation. In a continuous trial procedure, however, atropine but not chlordiazepoxide produced an increase in the total number of step downs; despite this, these groups showed acquisition at similar rates, though learning was not shown on retention testing under saline alone. These results enabled the two classes of drug to be distinguished. The nature of the heterogeneity between the two test paradigms is discussed, and results interpreted in terms of possible differential drug effects on punishment and escape components of the tasks.
在两种表面相似但理论上不同形式的避暗任务中,比较了氯氮卓和阿托品对大鼠被动回避学习获得的影响,试图从行为上区分这两类药物的去抑制作用。在离散试验程序中,氯氮卓和阿托品均显著延缓了学习获得;仅在盐水处理下的记忆测试中,初始氯氮卓组行为无变化,而初始阿托品组表现出促进作用。然而,在连续试验程序中,阿托品而非氯氮卓使避暗总数增加;尽管如此,这些组的学习获得率相似,不过仅在盐水处理下的记忆测试中未表现出学习效果。这些结果能够区分这两类药物。讨论了两种测试范式之间异质性的本质,并根据药物对任务惩罚和逃避成分可能的不同作用来解释结果。