Sokolova Anna, Joshi Vaibhavi, Chittoory Haarika, Walsh Michael, Lim Malcolm, Kutasovic Jamie R, Ferguson Kaltin, Simpson Peter T, Lakhani Sunil R, McCart Reed Amy E
Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sullivan and Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Histopathology. 2025 Aug;87(2):223-234. doi: 10.1111/his.15465. Epub 2025 May 13.
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) may show targetable vulnerabilities secondary to the characteristic loss of the cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Specifically, a synthetic lethal interaction was identified between E-cadherin loss and ROS1 inhibition. Several clinical trials are currently under way to assess the efficacy of ROS1 inhibitors in ILC; however, ROS1 expression has not been confirmed in ILC tumours and ROS1 has not been validated as a biomarker in the breast cancer setting. This study aimed to (i) examine ROS1 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer cases and (ii) investigate the biology and clinical significance of ROS1 positivity in breast cancer.
ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed on a large cohort of ILC (n = 274) and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST; n = 431) cases with extensive clinicopathological data. The staining performance of four ROS1 antibody clones was compared. There was marked variation in ROS1 status according to antibody clone. D4D6 and SP384 were negative in almost all breast cancer cases, whereas EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in 37 and 47% of ILC cases, and 49 and 74% of NST cases, respectively. Only data from clones D4D6 and SP384 were highly concordant, while EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in distinct breast cancer subtypes.
Assessment of ROS1 status in breast cancer appears to be highly antibody clone-dependent. ROS1 antibody clone selection will be an important consideration in the design of clinical trials investigating the clinical validity of ROS1 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer.
侵袭性小叶癌(ILC)可能由于细胞粘附蛋白E-钙粘蛋白的特征性缺失而表现出可靶向的脆弱性。具体而言,已确定E-钙粘蛋白缺失与ROS1抑制之间存在合成致死相互作用。目前正在进行多项临床试验以评估ROS1抑制剂在ILC中的疗效;然而,ILC肿瘤中ROS1的表达尚未得到证实,并且ROS1在乳腺癌环境中尚未被确认为生物标志物。本研究旨在(i)检查大量乳腺癌病例中的ROS1表达,以及(ii)研究乳腺癌中ROS1阳性的生物学和临床意义。
对一大组具有广泛临床病理数据的ILC(n = 274)和非特殊类型浸润性癌(NST;n = 431)病例进行了ROS1免疫组织化学检测。比较了四种ROS1抗体克隆的染色性能。根据抗体克隆,ROS1状态存在明显差异。D4D6和SP384在几乎所有乳腺癌病例中均为阴性,而EP282和EPMGHR2在37%的ILC病例和47%的NST病例中为阳性,在49%的NST病例和74%的NST病例中分别为阳性。只有来自克隆D4D6和SP384的数据高度一致,而EP282和EPMGHR2在不同的乳腺癌亚型中呈阳性。
乳腺癌中ROS1状态的评估似乎高度依赖抗体克隆。在设计研究ROS1作为乳腺癌预测生物标志物临床有效性的临床试验时,ROS1抗体克隆的选择将是一个重要的考虑因素。