da Silva Erisvan Vieira, de Arruda Guilherme Tavares, Berni Eduarda Brollo, Candido Amanda Dos Santos, Pivetta Hedioneia Maria Foletto, Braz Melissa Medeiros
Federal University of Santa Maria, Postgraduate Program in Movement Sciences and Rehabilitation, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Federal University of São Carlos, Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy, São Carlos, Brazil.
Sex Med. 2025 May 12;13(2):qfaf029. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfaf029. eCollection 2025 Apr.
There is a need for a more comprehensive tool for assessing male sexual function that is inclusive of diverse gender identities and sexual orientations.
Culturally adapt the Brazilian version of the Brief male Sexual Function Inventory (BSFI) and evaluate its measurement properties in adult men.
We conducted an online survey with 727 Brazilian men over 18 years of age (31.73 ± 10.88 years). According to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), we translated and evaluated the content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and minimum and maximum effects of the BSFI.
The final Brazilian version of the BSFI consisted of 10 items and was found to be relevant, comprehensive, and comprehensible.
Although it showed good content validity and reliability, the BSFI showed inadequate structural validity and insufficient internal consistency for at least one factor.
The Brazilian version of the BSFI can be used in adult males in community samples, pending evaluation in clinical samples.
The sampling bias associated with online recruitment may have excluded individuals without access to the Internet, thereby compromising the representativeness of the sample. This may limit generalizability. However, COSMIN guidelines were followed to ensure methodological rigor. The BSFI adaptation provides a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for assessing male sexual function, but has limitations in structural validity and internal consistency.
The Brazilian version of the BSFI showed sufficient validity (content validity and hypothesis testing for construct validity) in adult men and sufficient test-retest reliability.
需要一种更全面的工具来评估男性性功能,该工具应涵盖不同的性别认同和性取向。
对巴西版简短男性性功能量表(BSFI)进行文化适应性调整,并评估其在成年男性中的测量属性。
我们对727名18岁以上的巴西男性(年龄31.73±10.88岁)进行了在线调查。根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN),我们对BSFI进行了翻译,并评估了其内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性、构想效度、重测信度、测量误差以及最小和最大效应。
最终的巴西版BSFI由10个项目组成,被认为是相关的、全面的且易于理解的。
尽管BSFI显示出良好的内容效度和信度,但至少有一个因素的结构效度不足且内部一致性不够。
在临床样本评估之前,巴西版BSFI可用于社区样本中的成年男性。
与在线招募相关的抽样偏差可能排除了无法访问互联网的个体,从而影响了样本的代表性。这可能会限制普遍性。然而,遵循了COSMIN指南以确保方法的严谨性。BSFI的改编提供了一种用于评估男性性功能的患者报告结局指标,但在结构效度和内部一致性方面存在局限性。
巴西版BSFI在成年男性中显示出足够的效度(内容效度和构想效度的假设检验)和足够的重测信度。