Suppr超能文献

绘制沙特阿拉伯的新冠疫苗接种历程:洞察接种后不良反应及免疫动态

Charting the COVID-19 vaccination journey in Saudi Arabia: Insights into post-vaccination adverse effects and immunization dynamics.

作者信息

Subaiea Gehad M, Alkhateeb Nawaf, Sahman Faisal, Alsudayri Abdulrahman, Almudayni Abdulkarim M, Alrashidi Hamoud, Alshammari Abdulrahman M, Alamri Abdulwahab, Almuntashiri Sultan, Hussain Arshad, Khloofi Heba Ali, Anwar Sirajudheen

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 28;16:1561410. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1561410. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study evaluated the effects of different COVID-19 vaccines on Saudi Arabian residents, focusing on their safety, acceptance, and effectiveness. Gaining a better knowledge of these vaccination results will help develop more successful public health initiatives and increase confidence in vaccination campaigns throughout the Kingdom.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 401 participants from diverse backgrounds, covering different ages, genders, nationalities, weights, and education levels. The survey gathered information about participants' health conditions, their vaccines, side effects, and infection rates before and after vaccination. The data were analyzed to compare vaccine preferences, side effects, and infection trends overtime.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic-wise, most participants were men (62.84%) and Saudi nationals (96.01%), showing significant differences by gender and nationality (P < 0.001). The largest age group was 21-30 years (45.89%, P < 0.001), with 66.58% being university graduates (P < 0.001). Pfizer/BioNTech was the top choice across all doses, with 83.46% receiving it for the first dose, 78.1% for the second, and 39.28% for the third, reflecting a clear preference over other vaccines (P < 0.001). Pfizer/BioNTech recipients reported side effects after the first dose in 36.53% of cases, but only 1.86% needed medical help. Vaccination significantly reduced infection rates: Pfizer/BioNTech dropped infection rates from 43.18% to 8.33% after the third dose (P < 0.001), while Oxford/AstraZeneca saw rates fall from 12.88% to 0.76% after the third dose, but did not reach significance (P = 0.34). Overall, vaccinated individuals had much lower infection rates (28.17%) than among unvaccinated ones (100%), with a P-value of 0.020.

CONCLUSION

Our results concluded that Saudi Arabia's vaccination campaign has proven effective, especially after the second and third doses. Pfizer/BioNTech was the most preferred vaccine, demonstrating strong efficacy and safety, which helped build public confidence. Ongoing monitoring is crucial to maintaining pandemic control, post-marketing and public health strategies.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了不同新冠疫苗对沙特阿拉伯居民的影响,重点关注其安全性、可接受性和有效性。更好地了解这些疫苗接种结果将有助于制定更成功的公共卫生举措,并增强沙特全国对疫苗接种运动的信心。

方法

对401名来自不同背景的参与者进行了一项横断面研究,涵盖不同年龄、性别、国籍、体重和教育水平。该调查收集了参与者的健康状况、所接种的疫苗、副作用以及接种前后的感染率等信息。对数据进行分析,以比较疫苗偏好、副作用和随时间变化的感染趋势。

结果

在社会人口统计学方面,大多数参与者为男性(62.84%)和沙特国民(96.01%),按性别和国籍显示出显著差异(P<0.001)。最大年龄组为21 - 30岁(45.89%,P<0.001),66.58%为大学毕业生(P<0.001)。辉瑞/BioNTech在所有剂量中都是首选,83.46%的人第一剂接种它,78.1%的人第二剂接种它,39.28%的人第三剂接种它,这表明明显优于其他疫苗(P<0.001)。辉瑞/BioNTech的接种者中,36.53%的人在第一剂后报告有副作用,但只有1.86%的人需要医疗帮助。接种疫苗显著降低了感染率:辉瑞/BioNTech在第三剂后将感染率从43.18%降至8.33%(P<0.001),而牛津/阿斯利康在第三剂后感染率从12.88%降至0.76%,但未达到显著水平(P = 0.34)。总体而言,接种疫苗的个体感染率(2小17%)远低于未接种疫苗的个体(100%),P值为0.020。

结论

我们的结果表明,沙特阿拉伯的疫苗接种运动已证明是有效的,尤其是在第二剂和第三剂之后。辉瑞/BioNTech是最受欢迎的疫苗,显示出强大的疗效和安全性,这有助于建立公众信心。持续监测对于维持疫情控制、上市后监测和公共卫生策略至关重要。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验