Lee Seunghun, Kim Min-Chang
Institute of Disability Sport Science, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Apr 28;7:1542023. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1542023. eCollection 2025.
This study provides essential information for wheelchair basketball coaches and players to enhance tactical applications and training for improved performance. By examining the latest trends in sports classification and performance factors influencing game outcomes, this study presents a comparative analysis across different levels of international wheelchair basketball play.
To achieve this objective, major game factors were examined by analyzing descriptive statistics from each year regarding recent trends in sports class composition and the playing time of each class, followed by group difference tests. A total of 209 official game records from 24 teams participating in major international wheelchair basketball tournaments were analyzed. Group differences were tested in terms of sports class composition, playing time, and performance metrics.
First, scoring factors directly affecting game results were compared between groups. The difference test showed that the success rates of 2-point (50.73%) and 3-point (31.41%) shots differed significantly, while the free throw success rate did not. Significant differences were also found in the number of assists (22.94), defensive rebounds (27.38), and steals (5.95). Second, the medal group was compared with the non-medal group. The average sports class composition per quarter was significantly higher in the medal group (1QSC: 14.00, 2QSC: 13.96, 3QSC: 13.98, 4QSC: 13.96) than in the other group (1QSC: 13.89, 2QSC: 13.89, 3QSC: 13.85, 4QSC: 13.88). In terms of playing time differences by class, medal group players showed longer participation: 2.5-point (22:21), 4.0-point (14:46), 3.0-point (19:05), and 1.5-point (16:15). Third, from 2012 to 2022, trends in sports class composition and quarterly playing time have evolved. In 2022, the average playing time of 1.5-point and 4.0-point athletes decreased by about 4 min compared to 2012, while the playing time of 4.5-point athletes increased by approximately 5 min and that of 3.0-point athletes increased by about 2 min.
本研究为轮椅篮球教练和运动员提供了重要信息，以加强战术应用和训练，从而提高比赛成绩。通过研究体育分级的最新趋势以及影响比赛结果的表现因素，本研究对不同国际轮椅篮球比赛水平进行了比较分析。
为实现这一目标，通过分析每年关于体育分级构成和各分级上场时间的描述性统计数据来研究主要比赛因素，随后进行组间差异测试。分析了来自24支参加重大国际轮椅篮球锦标赛的球队的209份官方比赛记录。在体育分级构成、上场时间和表现指标方面进行了组间差异测试。
首先，比较了直接影响比赛结果的得分因素。差异测试表明，2分球（50.73%）和3分球（31.41%）的成功率存在显著差异，而罚球成功率没有。在助攻数（22.94）、防守篮板数（27.38）和抢断数（5.95）方面也发现了显著差异。其次，将奖牌组与非奖牌组进行了比较。奖牌组每节的平均体育分级构成（第一节体育分级：14.00，第二节体育分级：13.96，第三节体育分级：13.98，第四节体育分级：13.96）显著高于另一组（第一节体育分级：故13.89，第二节体育分级：13.89，第三节体育分级：13.85，第四节体育分级：13.88）。在按分级划分的上场时间差异方面，奖牌组球员的参与时间更长：2.5分级（22:21）、4.0分级（14:46）、3.0分级（19:05）和1.5分级（16:15）。第三，从201到2022年，体育分级构成和每节上场时间的趋势有所演变。2022年，1.5分级和4.0分级运动员的平均上场时间与2012年相比减少了约4分钟，而4.5分级运动员的上场时间增加了约5分钟，3.0分级运动员的上场时间增加了约2分钟。
