• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断变化的环境条件影响着两种常见的湿草原物种——[物种一]和[物种二]的表型可塑性。

Changing environmental conditions impact the phenotypic plasticity of and , two common wet grassland species.

作者信息

Edwards Keith R, Glocker Bernhard, Mastný Jiří, Picek Tomáš

机构信息

Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 28;16:1542907. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1542907. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2025.1542907
PMID:40357148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066794/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maintenance of species coexistence is an important and on-going subject of plant ecology. Here, we aimed to determine how and , two common, co-occurring plant species in European wet grasslands, respond to changing environmental conditions and what these changes portend for coexistence of these two species. Such studies are important for predicting and modelling the effects of management and climate change on wet grassland plant species composition and for maintaining the ability of wet grasslands to provide their important ecosystem services including carbon sequestration and water purification. Based on past studies, we hypothesized that both species would be affected by hydrologic changes but that these effects would be modified by nutrient conditions with fertilization having a more positive impact on .

METHODS

We established a mesocosm to distinguish the effect of hydrology and nutrients on the biomass allocation patterns of these two species to determine how environmental conditions may impact the life history traits of these two species, which would influence their ability to co-exist. Plants were grown in pots from late May to early September 2019 and subjected to two nutrient and three water level treatments. Half of the plants were harvested in July while the other half were harvested in early September and their biomass allocation patterns calculated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the effects of the environmental treatments on the measured parameters. In addition, we determined the phenotypic plasticity of the two species and whether these showed allometric relationships to plant size.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

was affected more by hydrologic changes, growing better in dry and saturated conditions, while fertilization had a more positive effect on . Both species were stressed when flooded, but more so than . Contrary to our predictions, produced more ramets and was taller than . Both species showed plastic responses to changing nutrient and water conditions, but only some were related to plant size. Our results indicate that and are more likely to co-exist in oligo- to mesotrophic wet grasslands with fluctuating water levels.

摘要

引言

维持物种共存是植物生态学中一个重要且持续研究的课题。在此,我们旨在确定欧洲湿润草地中两种常见且共生的植物物种X和Y如何应对不断变化的环境条件,以及这些变化对这两个物种共存意味着什么。此类研究对于预测和模拟管理及气候变化对湿润草地植物物种组成的影响,以及维持湿润草地提供包括碳固存和水净化在内的重要生态系统服务的能力至关重要。基于以往研究,我们假设这两个物种都会受到水文变化的影响,但这些影响会因养分条件而改变,施肥对X有更积极的影响。

方法

我们建立了一个中型生态系统,以区分水文和养分对这两个物种生物量分配模式的影响,从而确定环境条件如何影响这两个物种的生活史特征,而这将影响它们共存的能力。植物于2019年5月下旬至9月上旬在花盆中生长,并接受两种养分和三种水位处理。一半的植物在7月收获,另一半在9月初收获,并计算它们的生物量分配模式。进行单变量和多变量分析以确定环境处理对测量参数的影响。此外,我们确定了这两个物种的表型可塑性,以及它们是否与植物大小呈现异速生长关系。

结果与讨论

X受水文变化影响更大,在干燥和饱和条件下生长更好,而施肥对Y有更积极的影响。两个物种在被水淹时都会受到胁迫,但X比Y更严重。与我们的预测相反,X产生了更多的分株且更高。两个物种对变化的养分和水分条件都表现出可塑性反应,但只有一些与植物大小有关。我们的结果表明,X和Y更有可能在水位波动的贫营养至中营养湿润草地中共存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/29dec037e554/fpls-16-1542907-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/a729de16c400/fpls-16-1542907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/34ee0987165d/fpls-16-1542907-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/8ac1c9e89d7c/fpls-16-1542907-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/bdfa7e5515c6/fpls-16-1542907-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/29dec037e554/fpls-16-1542907-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/a729de16c400/fpls-16-1542907-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/34ee0987165d/fpls-16-1542907-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/8ac1c9e89d7c/fpls-16-1542907-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/bdfa7e5515c6/fpls-16-1542907-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c2/12066794/29dec037e554/fpls-16-1542907-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing environmental conditions impact the phenotypic plasticity of and , two common wet grassland species.不断变化的环境条件影响着两种常见的湿草原物种——[物种一]和[物种二]的表型可塑性。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 28;16:1542907. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1542907. eCollection 2025.
2
Multiple environmental factors, but not nutrient addition, directly affect wet grassland soil microbial community structure: a mesocosm study.多种环境因素而非养分添加直接影响湿地草原土壤微生物群落结构:一项中观实验研究。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2023 Jun 16;99(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiad070.
3
Allometric relationships and trade-offs in 11 common Mediterranean-climate grasses.11 种常见地中海气候草本植物的异速生长关系和权衡。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Jun;34(4):e2976. doi: 10.1002/eap.2976. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Increased productivity in wet years drives a decline in ecosystem stability with nitrogen additions in arid grasslands.氮添加增加干旱草原生产力,但降低生态系统稳定性,尤其是在湿润年份。
Ecology. 2017 Jul;98(7):1779-1786. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1878. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Fitness and niche differences are both important in explaining responses of plant diversity to nutrient addition.在解释植物多样性对养分添加的响应时,适应性和生态位差异都很重要。
Ecology. 2023 Aug;104(8):e4125. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4125. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
6
Stable isotopes in ecosystem science: structure, function and dynamics of a subtropical Savanna.生态系统科学中的稳定同位素:亚热带稀树草原的结构、功能与动态
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1999;13(13):1263-77. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990715)13:13<1263::AID-RCM653>3.0.CO;2-J.
7
Plant species as ecological engineers of microtopography in a temperate sedge-grass marsh.作为温带莎草草甸微地形生态工程师的植物物种。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98067-z.
8
Above- and belowground biomass allocation and its regulation by plant density in six common grassland species in China.中国六种常见草原物种的地上和地下生物量分配及其对植物密度的调节。
J Plant Res. 2022 Jan;135(1):41-53. doi: 10.1007/s10265-021-01353-w. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
9
Differential effect of drought regimes on the seedling performance of six floodplain grassland species.干旱对六种河滩草地物种幼苗性能的影响差异。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2018 Jul;20(4):691-697. doi: 10.1111/plb.12722. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Grassland ecosystem type drives AM fungal diversity and functional guild distribution in North American grasslands.草原生态系统类型驱动北美草原中 AM 真菌的多样性和功能类群分布。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Mar;32(5):1133-1148. doi: 10.1111/mec.16823. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple environmental factors, but not nutrient addition, directly affect wet grassland soil microbial community structure: a mesocosm study.多种环境因素而非养分添加直接影响湿地草原土壤微生物群落结构:一项中观实验研究。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2023 Jun 16;99(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiad070.
2
Phenotypic plasticity made simple, but not too simple.表型可塑性简化了,但又不过于简化。
Am J Bot. 2022 Oct;109(10):1519-1524. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16068. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Characterization, costs, cues and future perspectives of phenotypic plasticity.
表型可塑性的特征、成本、线索和未来展望。
Ann Bot. 2022 Sep 6;130(2):131-148. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac087.
4
Accounting for demographic uncertainty increases predictions for species coexistence: A case study with annual plants.考虑人口统计学不确定性会增加物种共存的预测:以一年生植物为例。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Jul;25(7):1618-1628. doi: 10.1111/ele.14011. Epub 2022 May 28.
5
A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach for ecological data: Using temporal dynamics of vegetation moisture as an example.一种用于生态数据的非线性混合效应建模方法:以植被水分的时间动态为例。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 15;9(18):10225-10240. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5543. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology.强化基于性状的植物生态学中的松散基石。
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3549-x. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes.遁入地下:根系特性作为生态系统过程的驱动因素。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;29(12):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
8
Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches.多年生植物的共存:生态位的尴尬。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):1019-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01496.x. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
9
A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants.植物表型可塑性的模块化概念。
New Phytol. 2005 Apr;166(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01310.x.
10
Resource competition and community structure.资源竞争与群落结构
Monogr Popul Biol. 1982;17:1-296.