• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与华法林相比,非瓣膜性心房颤动患者高治疗范围内时间的低剂量直接口服抗凝剂。

Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin with high time in therapeutic range in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sundsvall, Sweden.

Cardiology Department, Sundsvall Hospital, 856 43, Sundsvall, Sweden.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Apr;55(3):415-425. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02763-w. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11239-022-02763-w
PMID:36607464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10110706/
Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are dose-reduced in elderly and patients with impaired renal function. Only reduced dose dabigatran is concluded as having similar stroke risk reduction and lower risk of major bleeding than warfarin in the pivotal studies. In clinical practice, reduced dose is prescribed more often than expected making this an important issue. The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety between reduced dose DOACs and high TTR warfarin treatment (TTR ≥ 70%) in NVAF. A Swedish anticoagulation registry was used in identifying eligible patients from July 2011 to December 2017. The study cohort consisted of 40,564 patients with newly initiated DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) (11,083 patients) or warfarin treatment (29,481 patients) after exclusion of 374,135 patients due to not being warfarin or DOAC naïve, not being prescribed reduced dose, having previous mechanical heart valve (MHV), or being under 18 years old. The median durations of follow up were 365, 419, 432 and 473 days for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Warfarin TTR identified from Auricula was 70.0%. Endpoints (stroke and major bleeding) and baseline characteristics were collected from hospital administrative registers using ICD-10 codes. Cohorts were compared using weighted adjusted Cox regression after full optimal matching based on propensity scores. DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR with 95% CI) 0.85 (0.78-0.93), intracranial bleeding HR 0.64 (0.51-0.80), hemorrhagic stroke HR 0.68 (0.50-0.92), gastrointestinal bleeding HR 0.81 (0.69-0.96) and all-cause stroke HR 0.87 (0.76-0.99), than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran are associated with lower risk of major bleeding, HR 0.70 (0.63-0.78) and HR 0.80 (0.69-0.94), and rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, HR 0.73 (0.59-0.96), with higher major bleeding risk, HR 1.31 (1.15-1.48), compared to warfarin. Apixaban is associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to warfarin, HR 1.12 (1.03-1.21). DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause stroke, than high quality warfarin treatment, with exception of rivaroxaban that carried higher risk of major bleeding and lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism. In this large observational registry-based NVAF cohort, DOACs are preferred treatment in patients with indication for DOAC dose reduction, even in a high TTR setting.

摘要

直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)中的应用剂量在老年患者和肾功能受损患者中会减少。只有降低剂量的达比加群被认为与关键研究中的华法林相比具有相似的卒中风险降低和大出血风险降低。在临床实践中,降低剂量的处方比预期的更为常见,这是一个重要的问题。本研究的目的是比较 NVAF 中降低剂量的 DOACs 与高 TTR 华法林治疗(TTR≥70%)的有效性和安全性。一项瑞典抗凝登记处被用于从 2011 年 7 月至 2017 年 12 月确定合格患者。研究队列包括 40564 例新开始使用 DOAC(阿哌沙班、达比加群或利伐沙班)的患者(11083 例)或华法林治疗的患者(29481 例),排除了 374135 例由于不是华法林或 DOAC 初治患者、未开降低剂量处方、有既往机械心脏瓣膜(MHV)或年龄在 18 岁以下的患者。阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林的中位随访时间分别为 365、419、432 和 473 天。Auricula 识别的华法林 TTR 为 70.0%。终点(卒中和大出血)和基线特征从医院行政登记处使用 ICD-10 代码收集。在基于倾向评分进行完全最优匹配后,使用加权调整的 Cox 回归比较队列。DOACs 与大出血风险降低相关(95%CI 为 HR 0.85[0.78-0.93])、颅内出血 HR 0.64[0.51-0.80]、出血性卒中 HR 0.68[0.50-0.92]、胃肠道出血 HR 0.81[0.69-0.96]和全因卒中 HR 0.87[0.76-0.99],与华法林相比。阿哌沙班和达比加群与大出血风险降低相关,HR 0.70[0.63-0.78]和 HR 0.80[0.69-0.94],利伐沙班与缺血性卒中风险降低相关,HR 0.73[0.59-0.96],大出血风险增加,HR 1.31[1.15-1.48],与华法林相比。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的全因死亡率更高,HR 1.12[1.03-1.21]。DOACs 与大出血和全因卒中风险降低相关,优于高质量华法林治疗,利伐沙班除外,利伐沙班的大出血风险较高,卒中或全身性栓塞风险较低。在这项基于大型观察性登记的 NVAF 队列研究中,DOACs 是具有 DOAC 剂量减少指征的患者的首选治疗方法,即使在 TTR 较高的情况下也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a15f/10110706/7c793498229f/11239_2022_2763_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a15f/10110706/3997dec43c87/11239_2022_2763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a15f/10110706/7c793498229f/11239_2022_2763_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a15f/10110706/3997dec43c87/11239_2022_2763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a15f/10110706/7c793498229f/11239_2022_2763_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin with high time in therapeutic range in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.与华法林相比,非瓣膜性心房颤动患者高治疗范围内时间的低剂量直接口服抗凝剂。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Apr;55(3):415-425. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02763-w. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in treatment naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in the US Department of defense population.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗美国国防部人群中未经治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1116-1.
3
Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States medicare population: updated analysis.美国医疗保险人群中,与华法林相比,非瓣膜性心房颤动患者起始应用阿哌沙班、达比加群或利伐沙班后发生卒中/全身性栓塞、大出血的风险及相关费用:更新分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Dec;38(12):2131-2140. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115772. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.
5
Dose specific effectiveness and safety of DOACs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A Canadian retrospective cohort study.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者 DOACs 的剂量特异性有效性和安全性:一项加拿大回顾性队列研究。
Thromb Res. 2021 Jul;203:121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
Direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety of treatment with Apixaban, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation.直接比较阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班治疗房颤的疗效和安全性。
Thromb Res. 2020 Jan;185:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Major Bleeding Risk During Anticoagulation with Warfarin, Dabigatran, Apixaban, or Rivaroxaban in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者华法林、达比加群、阿哌沙班或利伐沙班抗凝治疗的大出血风险。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):968-978. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.968.
8
Real-World Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Health Care Costs of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the U.S. Department of Defense Population.美国国防部人群中非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的真实世界比较有效性、安全性和医疗保健成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Nov;24(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17488. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在伴有慢性肝脏疾病的心房颤动患者中的有效性和安全性的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
Circulation. 2023 Mar 7;147(10):782-794. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060687. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants and time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin in new-onset atrial fibrillation: a report from the nationwide FinACAF study.低剂量直接口服抗凝剂与治疗范围内时间定义的华法林用于新发房颤:来自全国性芬兰房颤研究(FinACAF)的报告
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Apr 23;5(3):oeaf046. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf046. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Minimally invasive left atrial appendage occlusion plus reduced dose direct oral anticoagulant to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation-the LAAO-PlusRE.微创左心耳封堵术联合低剂量直接口服抗凝药预防心房颤动患者卒中——LAAO-PlusRE研究
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 29;13(2):146-154. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-afm-18. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Underdosed Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.房颤和房扑患者使用低剂量直接口服抗凝剂的长期临床结局
Am J Med. 2021 Jun;134(6):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Novel anticoagulants in an older and frail population with atrial fibrillation: the effect of inappropriate dosing on clinical outcomes.新型抗凝药物在老年且体弱的房颤患者中的应用:不适当剂量对临床结局的影响。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Oct;11(5):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00343-w. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: The NAXOS Study.
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
评估利伐沙班用于预防心房颤动患者中风的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54252. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Regimens of Rivaroxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.利伐沙班不同给药方案用于心房颤动患者预防卒中的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51541. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51541. eCollection 2024 Jan.
非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的安全性和有效性比较:NAXOS 研究。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2066-2075. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028825. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Safety and effectiveness of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in real-world patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis of contemporary Japanese administrative claims data.非维生素K口服抗凝剂与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动真实世界患者中的安全性和有效性:基于当代日本行政索赔数据的回顾性分析
Open Heart. 2020 Apr 1;7(1):e001232. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001232. eCollection 2020.
5
Direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety of treatment with Apixaban, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation.直接比较阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班治疗房颤的疗效和安全性。
Thromb Res. 2020 Jan;185:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Low-Dose Rivaroxaban and Risks of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.低剂量利伐沙班与房颤患者不良事件风险。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2574-2577. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025623. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Dosing and Monitoring in Two Geriatric Outpatient Clinics.两家老年门诊诊所直接口服抗凝剂给药与监测的评估
Sr Care Pharm. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):192-205.
8
Efficacy and safety of reduced-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂降低剂量用于房颤患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 14;40(19):1492-1500. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy802.
9
Reduced Doses of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动缺血性卒中患者直接口服抗凝剂剂量的降低
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;28(2):354-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Different Rivaroxaban Dosage Regimens in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.不同利伐沙班剂量方案在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的疗效和安全性:一项全国性、基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 22;8(1):3451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21884-y.