Suppr超能文献

脑电图微状态的地形差异:区分青少年肌阵挛癫痫与额叶癫痫。

Topographic differences in EEG microstates: distinguishing juvenile myoclonic epilepsy from frontal lobe epilepsy.

作者信息

Li Ying, Xu Lidao, Zhao Yibo, Meng Mingxian, Chen Yanan, Wang Bin, Cui Beijia, Liu Jin, Han Jiuyan, Wang Na, Zhao Ting, Sun Lei, Ren Zhe, Han Xiong

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province China.

South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province China.

出版信息

Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10255-9. Epub 2025 May 10.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study aims to develop an exploratory classification model for Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME) based on electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate features to assist clinical diagnosis and reduce misdiagnosis rates. A total of 123 participants were included in this study, consisting of 74 patients diagnosed with JME and 49 patients with Frontal Lobe Epilepsy (FLE). Resting-state EEG data were retrospectively collected from all participants. After preprocessing, microstate analysis was performed, and 24 microstate features (including duration, occurrence rate, coverage, and transition probability) were extracted and analyzed. Finally, the extracted microstate parameters were used to train six machine learning classifiers to distinguish between the two types of epilepsy. The performance of these models was assessed by calculating accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The study found that all parameters of microstate A showed high consistency between the two groups. However, the JME group exhibited lower occurrence and smaller coverage of microstate B compared to the FLE group, while showing longer durations for microstate C. Additionally, the transition probabilities from microstate B to C and D were lower in the JME group, while the transition probability from C to D was significantly higher. When EEG microstate features were integrated into the six machine learning classifiers, the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) algorithm achieved the best classification performance (accuracy of 76.4%, precision of 79.5%, and AUC of 0.817). This study found significant differences in EEG microstate characteristics between JME and FLE. Based on 24 microstate features, a classification model was successfully developed and validated. These findings underscore the potential of EEG microstates as neurophysiological biomarkers for distinguishing between these two epilepsy types.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10255-9.

摘要

未标注

本研究旨在基于脑电图(EEG)微状态特征开发一种用于青少年肌阵挛性癫痫(JME)的探索性分类模型,以辅助临床诊断并降低误诊率。本研究共纳入123名参与者,其中包括74名被诊断为JME的患者和49名额叶癫痫(FLE)患者。回顾性收集了所有参与者的静息态EEG数据。经过预处理后,进行了微状态分析,并提取和分析了24个微状态特征(包括持续时间、发生率、覆盖率和转移概率)。最后,使用提取的微状态参数训练六个机器学习分类器,以区分这两种类型的癫痫。通过计算准确率、精确率、召回率、F1分数和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估这些模型的性能。研究发现,微状态A的所有参数在两组之间显示出高度一致性。然而,与FLE组相比,JME组微状态B的发生率较低且覆盖率较小,而微状态C的持续时间较长。此外,JME组中从微状态B到C和D的转移概率较低,而从C到D的转移概率显著较高。当将EEG微状态特征整合到六个机器学习分类器中时,线性判别分析(LDA)算法取得了最佳分类性能(准确率为76.4%,精确率为79.5%,AUC为0.817)。本研究发现JME和FLE之间的EEG微状态特征存在显著差异。基于24个微状态特征,成功开发并验证了一种分类模型。这些发现强调了EEG微状态作为区分这两种癫痫类型的神经生理学生物标志物的潜力。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11571-025-10255-9获取的补充材料。

相似文献

3
EEG microstates: Functional significance and short-term test-retest reliability.脑电图微状态:功能意义与短期重测信度。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Mar 12;2(2):100089. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100089. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验