• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在开发术后伤口护理教育材料方面有多成功?

How Successful Is AI in Developing Postsurgical Wound Care Education Material?

作者信息

Sürme Yeliz, Topan Handan, Maraş Baydoğan Gülseren

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Surgical Nursing, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2025 May-Jun;33(3):e70041. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70041.

DOI:10.1111/wrr.70041
PMID:40357563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12070243/
Abstract

ChatGPT can be used as an aid in education, research and clinical management. This study was conducted using the ChatGPT 4.0 program to develop artificial intelligence-supported wound care education material that can be read and understood by patients discharged after surgery. In this methodological study, while creating wound care education material, the education needs of the patients were determined first. Then, the education content was created in the ChatGPT 4 program. Expert opinion was taken for the clarity, applicability, accuracy and quality of the education content. The Turkish readability index of the education material was found to be 68.9 and easily understandable. The Automated Readability Index was found to be 9.29, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook 7.89, the Flesch-Kincaid 8.07, the Flesch Reading Ease 59.0 and the Average Reading Level Consensus 9.99, which are frequently used in health literature. The PEMAT understandability and applicability score averages were determined 93.90 ± 6.11 (84-100) and 90.20 ± 8.66, respectively. The Global Quality Scale score average was found to be 4.40 ± 0.69. This study reveals that ChatGPT provides understandable, applicable, accurate and high-quality postoperative wound care education material.

摘要

ChatGPT可用于辅助教育、研究和临床管理。本研究使用ChatGPT 4.0程序开发了人工智能支持的伤口护理教育材料,供术后出院的患者阅读和理解。在这项方法学研究中,在创建伤口护理教育材料时,首先确定患者的教育需求。然后,在ChatGPT 4程序中创建教育内容。针对教育内容的清晰度、适用性、准确性和质量征求了专家意见。发现该教育材料的土耳其语可读性指数为68.9,易于理解。自动可读性指数为9.29,简易晦涩度测量值为7.89,弗莱什-金凯德指数为8.07,弗莱什阅读简易度为59.0,健康文献中常用的平均阅读水平共识为9.99。PEMAT可理解性和适用性评分平均值分别确定为93.90±6.11(84-100)和90.20±8.66。全球质量量表评分平均值为4.40±0.69。本研究表明,ChatGPT提供了可理解、适用、准确和高质量的术后伤口护理教育材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/12070243/2578164cacdc/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/12070243/2578164cacdc/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/12070243/2578164cacdc/WRR-33-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How Successful Is AI in Developing Postsurgical Wound Care Education Material?人工智能在开发术后伤口护理教育材料方面有多成功?
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 May-Jun;33(3):e70041. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70041.
2
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.
3
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding rotator cuff injury than ChatGPT.美国矫形外科医师学会的OrthoInfo提供了比ChatGPT更具可读性的关于肩袖损伤的信息。
J ISAKOS. 2025 Feb 12;12:100841. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100841.
6
Evaluating the readability, quality, and reliability of responses generated by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity on the most commonly asked questions about Ankylosing spondylitis.评估ChatGPT、Gemini和Perplexity针对强直性脊柱炎最常见问题生成的回答的可读性、质量和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326351. eCollection 2025.
7
Assessing ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions in reconstructive urology.评估ChatGPT对重建泌尿外科常见患者问题的回答。
Urol Pract. 2025 Feb 12:101097UPJ0000000000000792. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000792.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.清创剂治疗二期愈合手术伤口的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(14):1-131. doi: 10.3310/hta5140.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
10
Bridging Health Literacy Gaps in Spine Care: Using ChatGPT-4o to Improve Patient-Education Materials.弥合脊柱护理中的健康素养差距:利用ChatGPT-4o改进患者教育材料。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01484.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing patient information texts in orthopaedics: How OpenAI's 'ChatGPT' can help.加强骨科患者信息文本:OpenAI的“ChatGPT”如何提供帮助。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Sep 17;11(3):e70019. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70019. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Chatbots talk Strabismus: Can AI become the new patient Educator?聊天机器人谈斜视:人工智能能否成为新的患者教育者?
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Nov;191:105592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105592. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
3
Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
评估在线脊髓刺激患者教育材料的可读性、质量和可靠性。
Turk Neurosurg. 2024;34(4):588-599. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42973-22.3.
4
Evaluating ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 Responses on Hyperlipidemia for Patient Education.评估ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0关于高脂血症的患者教育回复。
Cureus. 2024 May 25;16(5):e61067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61067. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Patients' experiences of day surgery and recovery: A meta-ethnography.患者日间手术和康复体验的荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2055. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2055.
6
Knowledge, attitude and practices towards surgical wound care and healing among the public in the Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉赞地区公众对手术伤口护理和愈合的知识、态度和实践。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 22;102(51):e36776. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036776.
7
Can ChatGPT Aid Clinicians in Educating Patients on the Surgical Management of Glaucoma?ChatGPT 能否帮助临床医生向患者讲解青光眼的手术治疗?
J Glaucoma. 2024 Feb 1;33(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002338. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
8
Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures.通过聊天机器人生成的材料优化眼科患者教育:人工智能生成的患者教育材料和美国眼科整形重建外科学会患者手册的可读性分析。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;40(2):212-216. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002549. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
9
Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources of patient education material for obstructive sleep apnoea: ChatGPT versus Google Bard.人工智能聊天机器人作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者教育材料的来源:ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08319-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.患者教育材料评估工具土耳其语版本的心理测量测试
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023 Oct;31(3):180-187. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.22196.