Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1505-1514. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz126.
Physician burnout associated with EHRs is a major concern in health care. A comprehensive assessment of differences among physicians in the areas of EHR performance, efficiency, and satisfaction has not been conducted. The study sought to study relationships among physicians' performance, efficiency, perceived workload, satisfaction, and usability in using the electronic health record (EHR) with comparisons by age, gender, professional role, and years of experience with the EHR.
Mixed-methods assessments of the medical intensivists' EHR use and perceptions. Using simulated cases, we employed standardized scales, performance measures, and extensive interviews. NASA Task Load Index (TLX), System Usability Scale (SUS), and Questionnaire on User Interface Satisfaction surveys were deployed.
The study enrolled 25 intensive care unit (ICU) physicians (11 residents, 9 fellows, 5 attendings); 12 (48%) were men, with a mean age of 33 (range, 28-55) years and a mean of 4 (interquartile range, 2.0-5.5) years of Epic experience. Overall task performance scores were similar for men (90% ± 9.3%) and women (92% ± 4.4%), with no statistically significant differences (P = .374). However, female physicians demonstrated higher efficiency in completion time (difference = 7.1 minutes; P = .207) and mouse clicks (difference = 54; P = .13). Overall, men reported significantly higher perceived EHR workload stress compared with women (difference = 17.5; P < .001). Men reported significantly higher levels of frustration with the EHR compared with women (difference = 33.15; P < .001). Women reported significantly higher satisfaction with the ease of use of the EHR interface than men (difference = 0.66; P =.03). The women's perceived overall usability of the EHR is marginally higher than that of the men (difference = 10.31; P =.06).
Among ICU physicians, we measured significant gender-based differences in perceived EHR workload stress, satisfaction, and usability-corresponding to objective patterns in EHR efficiency. Understanding the reasons for these differences may help reduce burnout and guide improvements to physician performance, efficiency, and satisfaction with EHR use.
Mixed-methods assessments of the medical intensivists' EHR use and perceptions. Using simulated cases, we employed standardized scales, performance measures, and extensive interviews.
与电子病历(EHR)相关的医生倦怠是医疗保健中的一个主要问题。尚未对医生在 EHR 性能、效率和满意度方面的差异进行全面评估。本研究旨在通过比较年龄、性别、专业角色和使用 EHR 的年限,研究医生在使用电子健康记录(EHR)方面的绩效、效率、感知工作量、满意度和可用性之间的关系。
对重症监护病房(ICU)医生的 EHR 使用情况和认知进行混合方法评估。我们使用模拟病例,采用标准化量表、绩效衡量标准和广泛的访谈。部署了 NASA 任务负荷指数(TLX)、系统可用性量表(SUS)和用户界面满意度问卷。
这项研究共纳入了 25 名重症监护病房(ICU)医生(11 名住院医师、9 名研究员、5 名主治医生);12 名(48%)为男性,平均年龄为 33 岁(范围为 28-55 岁),使用 Epic 的平均年限为 4 年(四分位距,2.0-5.5 年)。男性和女性的总体任务绩效评分相似(男性为 90%±9.3%,女性为 92%±4.4%),无统计学差异(P=0.374)。然而,女性医生在完成时间(差值=7.1 分钟;P=0.207)和鼠标点击(差值=54;P=0.13)方面效率更高。总体而言,男性报告的 EHR 工作量压力明显高于女性(差值=17.5;P<.001)。男性报告的对 EHR 的挫败感明显高于女性(差值=33.15;P<.001)。女性报告的对 EHR 界面易用性的满意度明显高于男性(差值=0.66;P=0.03)。女性对 EHR 的整体可用性的感知略高于男性(差值=10.31;P=0.06)。
在 ICU 医生中,我们测量了感知 EHR 工作量压力、满意度和可用性方面的显著性别差异,这些差异与 EHR 效率的客观模式相对应。了解这些差异的原因可能有助于减少倦怠,并指导改善医生的绩效、效率和对 EHR 使用的满意度。
对重症监护医生的 EHR 使用和认知进行混合方法评估。我们使用模拟病例,采用标准化量表、绩效衡量标准和广泛的访谈。