• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提升护理领域的组织正念:弥合理论与实践的差距。

Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.

作者信息

Hefetz Tmira, Drach-Zahavy Anat

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2025;50(3):250-260. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443. Epub 2025 May 9.

DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443
PMID:40358074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12105971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap.

PURPOSE

We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources.

METHODOLOGY

We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.

FINDINGS

Conceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.

摘要

背景

根据组织正念(OM)理论,团队必须通过避免过度简化的解释、关注运营细节、保持恢复力的承诺、专注于失败以及在解决问题时优先考虑专业知识,不断预测并从意外事件中恢复过来。尽管OM理论有其优点,但将其融入医疗保健系统仍然具有挑战性,因为这些系统中的基本做法和程序往往与OM的核心原则相冲突,导致实施差距。

目的

我们首先强调为什么医疗保健专业人员,尤其是护士,尚未准备好甚至抵制OM。尽管OM高度以患者为中心,使护士能够按照护理理想进行实践,但由于在没有足够资源的情况下给他们带来的负担,他们可能不愿意接受它。

方法

我们认为,变革准备度(RFC)理论通过识别和减轻变革障碍,为应对这一挑战提供了有价值的见解。我们将对OM的研究与RFC模型相结合,以概念化如何将OM系统地整合到医疗保健环境中。

研究结果

从概念上整合RFC和OM框架有助于缩小OM理论与实施之间的差距。为了进一步推动该领域的发展,OM学者应专注于更好地将OM原则付诸实践、设计实施OM的干预措施,并通过纵向设计评估其有效性,同时确定OM有效实施的背景边界条件。此外,我们描述了领导者在管理资源限制和支持不堪重负的医护人员的同时,如何支持OM和RFC。

实践意义

我们将分析提炼为六步路线图,为旨在实施OM的医疗保健政策制定者、管理人员和经理提出基于证据的策略。

相似文献

1
Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.提升护理领域的组织正念:弥合理论与实践的差距。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2025;50(3):250-260. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000443. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders.影响最佳实践指南实施的因素:从管理人员、护理人员和项目负责人身上吸取的经验教训。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(4):210-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00106.x.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study.与基于初级保健的远程医疗行为项目的实施和转化相关的组织因素,以改善血压控制:HTN-IMPROVE 研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 8;8:106. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-106.
5
Professionals´ readiness for change to knowledge-based palliative care at nursing homes: a qualitative follow-up study after an educational intervention.专业人员对养老院基于知识的姑息治疗转变的准备情况:教育干预后的定性随访研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 20;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01018-y.
6
Organizational readiness for change: A systematic review of the healthcare literature.组织变革准备度:对医疗保健文献的系统评价
Implement Res Pract. 2025 May 15;6:26334895251334536. doi: 10.1177/26334895251334536. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
8
Assessing organizational readiness for depression care quality improvement: relative commitment and implementation capability.评估组织对改善抑郁症护理质量的准备情况:相对承诺和实施能力。
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 2;9:173. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0173-1.
9
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
10
Leading evidence-based practice: nurse managers' strategies for knowledge utilisation in acute care settings.引领循证实践:护士长在急症护理环境中促进知识应用的策略
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 6;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02912-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Change fatigue in nursing: An integrative review.护士疲劳的改变:综合评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb;79(2):454-470. doi: 10.1111/jan.15546. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
2
Nurse champions as street-level bureaucrats: Factors which facilitate innovation, policy making, and reconstruction.作为基层官僚的护士倡导者:促进创新、政策制定和重建的因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 23;13:872131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872131. eCollection 2022.
3
High reliability organising in healthcare: still a long way left to go.医疗保健领域的高可靠性组织:仍有很长的路要走。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):845-848. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014141. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Striving for high reliability in healthcare: a qualitative study of the implementation of a hospital safety programme.追求医疗保健领域的高可靠性:一项关于医院安全计划实施情况的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):867-877. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013938. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
Nursing Care Systematization with Case-Based Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence.基于案例推理和人工智能的护理系统化。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 9;2022:1959371. doi: 10.1155/2022/1959371. eCollection 2022.
6
Is Gaining Affective Commitment the Missing Strategy for Successful Change Management in Healthcare?获得情感承诺是医疗保健领域成功变革管理缺失的策略吗?
J Healthc Leadersh. 2022 Jan 19;14:1-4. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S347987. eCollection 2022.
7
We're all in this together: how COVID-19 revealed the co-construction of mindful organising and organisational reliability.我们同舟共济:新冠疫情如何揭示了正念组织与组织可靠性的共同构建。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):230-233. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014068. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Agility and Safety Performance among Nurses: The Mediating Role of Mindful Organizing.护士的敏捷性与安全绩效:正念组织的中介作用。
Nurs Rep. 2021 Aug 30;11(3):666-679. doi: 10.3390/nursrep11030063.
9
Assessing individual readiness for change in healthcare: a review of measurement scales.评估医疗保健中个体改变的准备度:测量量表综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Jul 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2020-0414.
10
Change fatigue in nurses: A qualitative study.护士的疲劳变化:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Oct;76(10):2627-2636. doi: 10.1111/jan.14454. Epub 2020 Jul 20.