• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌胚抗原水平升高预示着接受新辅助治疗的临界可切除胰腺癌患者无法进行手术。

Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predict Failure to Reach Surgery in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Referred to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

作者信息

Jacover Arielle, Beller Tamar, Mahamid Nedaa, Avishay Noa, Ilan Karny, Elizur Yoav, Murad Havi, Pery Ron, Eshkenazy Rony, Goldes Yuri, Golan Talia, Nachmany Ido, Pencovich Niv

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17433-3.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17433-3
PMID:40358783
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is generally preferred over upfront surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC), but many patients fail to reach surgical resection. This study evaluates real-world outcomes of NT in BR-PDAC and identifies predictors of failure to proceed to surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with resectable and BR-PDAC diagnosed between January 2015 and July 2024 was performed. Patient and disease characteristics were assessed to identify factors associated with NT dropout and failure to achieve surgical resection.

RESULTS

Of 161 BR-PDAC patients, 111 (69%) were referred to NT and 50 (31%) underwent upfront surgery. Among those referred to NT, 78 (70%) completed therapy and underwent resection. Reasons for failure to reach surgery included local tumor progression (39%), newly developed metastases (18%), and intraoperative findings (27%). Patients failing to reach surgery had significantly higher baseline bilirubin, white blood cell count, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Elevated CEA significantly predicted surgical failure (adjusted odds ratio: 0.68 per 5-unit increase). Local progression was the primary cause of surgical failure in patients with elevated CEA (60%). Patients achieving resection had significantly improved overall survival (OS). There was no significant difference in OS or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients undergoing upfront surgery and those completing NT followed by resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated baseline CEA predicts failure to achieve surgical resection after NT, primarily owing to local progression. Multicenter studies are essential to refine patient selection criteria for upfront surgery and optimize personalized therapeutic strategies.

摘要

引言

对于临界可切除的胰腺导管腺癌(BR-PDAC),新辅助治疗(NT)通常比直接手术更受青睐,但许多患者未能进行手术切除。本研究评估了BR-PDAC患者接受NT的真实世界结局,并确定了未能进行手术的预测因素。

方法

对2015年1月至2024年7月期间诊断为可切除和BR-PDAC的患者进行回顾性分析。评估患者和疾病特征,以确定与NT退出和未能实现手术切除相关的因素。

结果

在161例BR-PDAC患者中,111例(69%)接受了NT,50例(31%)接受了直接手术。在接受NT的患者中,78例(70%)完成治疗并接受了切除。未能进行手术的原因包括局部肿瘤进展(39%)、新出现的转移(18%)和术中发现(27%)。未能进行手术的患者基线胆红素、白细胞计数和癌胚抗原(CEA)水平显著更高。CEA升高显著预测手术失败(每增加5个单位调整比值比:0.68)。局部进展是CEA升高患者手术失败的主要原因(60%)。接受切除的患者总生存期(OS)显著改善。接受直接手术的患者与完成NT后接受切除的患者在OS或无病生存期(DFS)方面无显著差异。

结论

基线CEA升高预测NT后未能实现手术切除,主要原因是局部进展。多中心研究对于完善直接手术的患者选择标准和优化个性化治疗策略至关重要。

相似文献

1
Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predict Failure to Reach Surgery in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Referred to Neoadjuvant Therapy.癌胚抗原水平升高预示着接受新辅助治疗的临界可切除胰腺癌患者无法进行手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17433-3.
2
ASO Author Reflections: Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Predictor of Failure to Reach Surgery in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.ASO作者反思:癌胚抗原作为新辅助治疗的临界可切除胰腺癌患者无法进行手术的预测指标
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17536-x.
3
Survival Outcomes in Nonmetastatic pT4 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis Comparing Neoadjuvant Therapy and Upfront Surgery with Propensity Score Matching.非转移性pT4胰腺导管腺癌的生存结局:一项利用倾向评分匹配比较新辅助治疗和直接手术的监测、流行病学与结果(SEER)数据库分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Mar 1;26(3):847-859. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.3.847.
4
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-Retrospective Review From a Tertiary Care Hospital.新辅助化疗联合放化疗治疗临界可切除或局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌患者——来自三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(4):392-398. doi: 10.1111/ajco.14166. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Might be Limited to Biologically Borderline Resectable Cases.新辅助治疗对可切除胰腺癌的疗效可能仅限于生物学上临界可切除的病例。
Pancreas. 2025 Aug 1;54(7):e630-e636. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002485.
6
Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.可切除及边缘可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗与直接手术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2025 Jul;311:221-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.04.042. Epub 2025 May 28.
7
Survival equivalence in patients treated for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.可切除和不可切除局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌患者的生存等效性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Feb;23(2):173-186. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.022. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Pancreas: Outcomes from the National Cancer Database.新辅助治疗对胰腺腺鳞癌患者的作用:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 2;56(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01269-x.
9
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Standard Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12630.
10
Comparison of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新辅助治疗与手术优先治疗可切除或交界可切除胰腺癌的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0295983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295983. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Predictor of Failure to Reach Surgery in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.ASO作者反思:癌胚抗原作为新辅助治疗的临界可切除胰腺癌患者无法进行手术的预测指标
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17536-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.接受新辅助FOLFIRINOX治疗的边缘性、不可切除和可切除胰腺癌患者的治疗反应与总生存期的关系
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 2;13(17):5206. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175206.
2
Can preoperative Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 predict metastatic pancreatic cancer? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前糖类抗原 19-9 能否预测转移性胰腺癌?系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 May;26(5):630-638. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Serum CEA as a Prognostic Marker for Overall Survival in Patients with Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Non-Elevated CA19-9 Levels Treated with FOLFIRINOX as Initial Treatment: A TAPS Consortium Study.
血清 CEA 作为 FOLFIRINOX 初始治疗的局部胰腺腺癌和非升高 CA19-9 水平患者总生存的预后标志物:TAPS 联盟研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1919-1932. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14680-0. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.局部进展期和交界可切除胰腺癌患者的术前化疗、放疗和手术决策。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;21(2):101-124. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Immediate surgery compared with short-course neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (ESPAC5): a four-arm, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.在可切除边缘的胰腺癌患者中,即刻手术与短程新辅助吉西他滨联合卡培他滨、FOLFIRINOX或放化疗的比较(ESPAC5):一项四臂、多中心、随机、2期试验
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;8(2):157-168. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00348-X. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
6
Microbiology of bile aspirates obtained at ERCP in patients with suspected acute cholangitis.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)获取的疑似急性胆管炎患者胆汁抽吸物的微生物学。
Endoscopy. 2022 Nov;54(11):1045-1052. doi: 10.1055/a-1790-1314. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
7
Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.可切除和交界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗或 upfront 手术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jan;160:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
8
Role of Serum Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen (CEA) Level in Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: CEA Level Before Operation is a Significant Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Surgical Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.血清癌胚抗原(CEA)水平在局限性胰腺腺癌中的作用:术前 CEA 水平是新辅助治疗后接受手术切除的局部晚期胰腺癌患者的重要预后指标:回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):e698-e707. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004148. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018.欧洲癌症发病率和死亡率模式:2018 年 40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的估计值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
10
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With FOLFIRINOX Followed by Individualized Chemoradiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.FOLFIRINOX 新辅助治疗联合个体化放化疗治疗边界可切除胰腺腺癌:一项 2 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):963-969. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0329.