Rocque Gabrielle B, Franks Jeffrey A, Deng Luqin, Caston Nicole E, Williams Courtney P, Azuero Andres, Dent D'Ambra, Jackson Bradford E, McGowan Chelsea, Henderson Nicole L, Huang Chao-Hui Sylvia, Ingram Stacey, Odom J Nicholas, Eltoum Noon, Weiner Bryan, Howell Doris, Stover Angela M, Pierce Jennifer Young, Basch Ethan M
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9852.
Value-based health care increasingly requires electronic patient-reported outcome-based remote symptom monitoring (RSM) to improve health care utilization in patients with cancer. However, data on the impact of RSM in clinical practice are lacking.
To evaluate the association of RSM with 3- and 6-month health care utilization among patients receiving systemic cancer treatment.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized controlled trial used a hybrid, type 2 implementation-effectiveness design. Participants were patients with cancer at 2 Alabama-based academic institutions receiving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy; the exposure group received standard-of-care delivered RSM from 2021 to 2024, and historical controls were patients who received cancer treatment prior to RSM implementation from 2017 to 2021. Data were analyzed from May to October 2024.
RSM using electronic patient-reported outcomes.
Health care utilization at 3 and 6 months after RSM enrollment (intensive care unit [ICU] admissions, hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits). Adjusted modified Poisson models estimated the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of health care utilization overall. Penalized logistic regression was used for stratified analyses by patient race, residence, neighborhood deprivation, insurance type, and comorbid conditions.
A total of 5949 patients were assessed. From May 2021 to May 2024, 1392 patients (median [IQR] age at index date, 61 [51-69] years; 933 [67%] female) were enrolled in RSM, including 378 Black patients (27%) and 922 White patients (66%), with 262 patients (19%) living in rural areas and 372 patients (27%) living in areas with high neighborhood disadvantage; RSM patients were compared with 4557 controls (median [IQR] age at index date, 62 [53-69] years; 2654 [58%] female), including 1177 Black patients (26%) and 3151 White patients (69%), with 1012 patients (22%) living in rural areas, and 1281 patients (28%) living in areas with high neighborhood disadvantage. Compared with historical controls, hospitalizations among patients receiving RSM were 19% lower at 3 months (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) and 13% lower at 6 months (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). ICU admissions were not significantly different among the RSM populations compared with controls (3 months: RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.13; 6 months: RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.06). ED visits were similar for both groups (3 months: RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.16; 6 months: RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15). Subset analyses showed similar patterns in 3- and 6-month RR for hospitalizations, ED visits, and ICU admissions.
In this nonrandomized controlled trial, RSM implementation was associated with reduced risk of hospitalizations for patients with cancer, supporting the need to expand implementation nationally.
基于价值的医疗保健越来越需要基于电子患者报告结局的远程症状监测(RSM),以改善癌症患者的医疗保健利用情况。然而,关于RSM在临床实践中的影响的数据尚缺。
评估RSM与接受全身性癌症治疗患者3个月和6个月时医疗保健利用情况之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项非随机对照试验采用了混合的2型实施-有效性设计。参与者为阿拉巴马州两家学术机构中正在接受化疗、靶向治疗或免疫治疗的癌症患者;暴露组在2021年至2024年期间接受了标准护理提供的RSM,历史对照为2017年至2021年RSM实施之前接受癌症治疗的患者。数据于2024年5月至10月进行分析。
使用电子患者报告结局的RSM。
RSM入组后3个月和6个月时的医疗保健利用情况(重症监护病房[ICU]入院、住院、急诊科[ED]就诊)。调整后的修正泊松模型估计了总体医疗保健利用的相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间。采用惩罚逻辑回归按患者种族、居住地、社区贫困程度、保险类型和合并症进行分层分析。
共评估了5949例患者。从2021年5月至2024年5月,1392例患者(索引日期的中位[四分位间距]年龄为61[51-69]岁;933例[67%]为女性)入组RSM,包括378例黑人患者(27%)和922例白人患者(66%),262例患者(19%)居住在农村地区,372例患者(27%)居住在社区劣势高的地区;将RSM患者与4557例对照(索引日期的中位[四分位间距]年龄为62[53-69]岁;2654例[58%]为女性)进行比较,包括1177例黑人患者(26%)和3151例白人患者(69%),1012例患者(22%)居住在农村地区,1281例患者(28%)居住在社区劣势高的地区。与历史对照相比,接受RSM的患者在3个月时住院率降低了19%(RR,0.81;95%置信区间,0.73-0.91),在6个月时降低了13%(RR,0.87;95%置信区间,0.80-0.96)。与对照组相比,RSM人群中的ICU入院率无显著差异(3个月:RR,0.82;95%置信区间,0.59-1.13;6个月:RR,0.83;95%置信区间,0.65-1.06)。两组的ED就诊情况相似(3个月:RR,1.02;95%置信区间,0.89-1.16;6个月:RR,1.03;95%置信区间,0.92-1.15)。亚组分析显示,住院、ED就诊和ICU入院的3个月和6个月RR呈现相似模式。
在这项非随机对照试验中,RSM的实施与癌症患者住院风险降低相关,支持在全国范围内扩大实施的必要性。