Lenton Emily, Seear Kate, Farrugia Adrian, Lemoh Chris, Cama Elena, Nourse Gemma, Treloar Carla
Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Deakin Law School, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 May;47(4):e70043. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70043.
Encounters with stigma in healthcare settings are well-documented. In recent years, significant attention has begun to be paid to how we can reduce these stigmas, including through the identification and reformation of structural forces that shape and sustain them. This article analyses 30 interviews conducted with clinical and nonclinical healthcare workers, as part of a larger project that aims to reduce health-related stigma for all. A major theme running through the interviews was the constitutive role of medical records in the production of stigma. Interview participants expressed several concerns about the ways such records can produce and reproduce stigma associated with numerous health conditions, identities, and practices. We examine how the very process of producing medical records can be implicated in stigma. We ask, how do systems shape data production, reproduction, access and dissemination? To what extent might processes and systems help to generate, maintain or exacerbate stigma through the demands of medical record keeping, and are reforms needed at these levels too? In addressing these questions, we work with Latour's notion of affordances to examine medical records as a technology that can reflect and reproduce social and political arrangements, including stigma. We argue that institutions and structures responsible for the governance of these systems need to contend with the important entanglements between medical record systems and stigma. We conclude with recommendations for how policymakers, health service leaders and researchers might intervene in the production of stigma afforded by these forms of communication.
在医疗环境中遭遇污名化的情况已有充分记录。近年来,人们开始高度关注如何减少这些污名,包括通过识别和改革塑造并维持污名的结构性力量。本文分析了对临床和非临床医护人员进行的30次访谈,这是一个旨在减少所有人与健康相关污名的更大项目的一部分。贯穿访谈的一个主要主题是病历在污名产生过程中的构成性作用。访谈参与者对这些记录可能产生和再现与多种健康状况、身份及行为相关污名的方式表达了诸多担忧。我们研究了病历制作过程本身如何与污名化相关联。我们提出问题,系统如何塑造数据的产生、复制、获取和传播?在多大程度上,流程和系统可能因病历记录的要求而有助于产生、维持或加剧污名,以及在这些层面是否也需要进行改革?在解决这些问题时,我们运用拉图尔的可供性概念来审视病历,将其视为一种能够反映和再现包括污名在内的社会和政治安排的技术。我们认为,负责管理这些系统的机构和结构需要应对病历系统与污名之间的重要纠葛。我们最后提出建议,说明政策制定者、卫生服务领导者和研究人员如何干预这些沟通形式所带来的污名产生。