Suppr超能文献

卫生系统中堕胎的结构性污名化:英格兰和威尔士堕胎护理寻求者、提供者、管理者及资助者的观点

Structural stigmatisation of abortion in the health system: Perspectives of abortion care-seekers, providers, managers, and funders in England and Wales.

作者信息

Footman Katy

机构信息

Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2025 Jan;365:117566. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117566. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

Abortion has been legally permitted in England and Wales for over fifty years, yet this health service continues to be stigmatised within the health system. Stigma is a dominant focus of abortion research, but a structural stigma framework is rarely used to understand how abortion stigma is produced at a macro-level. This study explored how structural abortion stigma is produced and experienced in the health systems of England and Wales, and its influence on person-centred care, including choice of abortion methods. Data from in-depth interviews with abortion care-seekers in 2022-23 and from key informant interviews with abortion care providers, managers, and commissioners in 2021 were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. From the perspectives of key informants, structural abortion stigma is produced through the avoidance of abortion by decision-makers, the permitting of conscientious objection, and the exclusion of abortion from mainstream healthcare. These factors create health system pressures which increase abortion service fragility. The resulting vulnerability of abortion services reduces access to person-centred care, including abortion method choice, which can reinforce individual-level stigma. There are tensions between care-seekers' experiences of specialist abortion care as less stigmatising, while the 'abortion clinic' becomes a site of stigma due to its segregation from mainstream healthcare. This research contributes to a structural understanding of abortion stigma by identifying some of the mechanisms through which structural stigma is produced within health system institutions, and how these forms of institutional stigma might be resisted or dismantled. Power is essential to the (re)production of structural stigma within the health system, which can reinforce individual-level stigma for both care-seekers and providers. Restrictions on method choice and the increasing reliance on medication abortion can be a product of structural abortion stigma, and these limitations on method choice can also reproduce stigma at the individual level.

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士,堕胎合法已逾五十载,但这项医疗服务在医疗体系中仍饱受污名化。污名是堕胎研究的主要焦点,但很少有人用结构性污名框架来理解堕胎污名是如何在宏观层面产生的。本研究探讨了英格兰和威尔士医疗体系中结构性堕胎污名是如何产生和被体验的,以及它对以患者为中心的护理的影响,包括堕胎方式的选择。采用反思性主题分析法,对2022 - 2023年堕胎寻求者的深度访谈数据以及2021年对堕胎护理提供者、管理人员和专员的关键信息提供者访谈数据进行了分析。从关键信息提供者的角度来看,结构性堕胎污名是通过决策者对堕胎的回避、对出于良心拒服兵役的许可以及将堕胎排除在主流医疗保健之外而产生的。这些因素给医疗体系带来压力,增加了堕胎服务的脆弱性。堕胎服务由此产生的脆弱性减少了获得以患者为中心的护理的机会,包括堕胎方式的选择,这可能会强化个人层面的污名。堕胎寻求者认为专科堕胎护理的污名较小,而“堕胎诊所”因其与主流医疗保健的隔离而成为污名场所,这两者之间存在矛盾。本研究通过识别医疗体系机构内部产生结构性污名的一些机制,以及这些形式的机构污名可能如何被抵制或消除,为对堕胎污名的结构性理解做出了贡献。权力对于医疗体系内结构性污名的(再)产生至关重要,这会强化堕胎寻求者和提供者个人层面的污名。对堕胎方式选择的限制以及对药物流产的日益依赖可能是结构性堕胎污名的产物,而这些对堕胎方式选择的限制也会在个人层面上重现污名。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验