• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多输出机器学习模型提高医院到达时生命体征的预测准确性:对JSAS登记数据的回顾性研究

Improving prediction accuracy of hospital arrival vital signs using a multi-output machine learning model: a retrospective study of JSAS-registry data.

作者信息

Kawai Yasuyuki, Yamamoto Koji, Tsuruta Keisuke, Miyazaki Keita, Asai Hideki, Fukushima Hidetada

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Shijo-cho, 840, Kashihara City, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01233-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-025-01233-9
PMID:40360997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12076835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients can deteriorate rapidly; therefore, prompt prehospital interventions and seamless transition to in-hospital care upon arrival are crucial for improving survival. In Japan, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) complement general emergency medical services (GEMS) by providing on-site care, reducing transport times, and aiding facility selection. Vital signs at hospital arrival determine initial management, but existing models are poor at predicting them, especially in patients receiving continuous interventions from both GEMS and HEMS. Therefore, we developed a machine-learning model to accurately predict the actual values of vital signs at hospital arrival using limited patient characteristic data and prehospital vital signs.

METHODS

Using data from the Japanese Society for Aeromedical Services registry, we retrospectively analyzed data from patients aged ≥18 years transported by HEMS between April 2020 and March 2022. Patients with cardiac arrest during transport, missing vital signs, and data inconsistencies were excluded. The predictive model used prehospital vital signs from GEMS and HEMS contact times, demographic characteristics, and intervention information. The primary outcome was the actual values of vital signs measured at hospital arrival. After data preprocessing, we constructed a deep neural network multi-output regression model using Bayesian optimization. Model performance was assessed by comparing the predicted values with the actual hospital arrival measurements using mean absolute error, R² score, residual standard deviation, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Additionally, the NN model's performance was compared with alternative methods, namely HEMS contact values and change-based predictions derived solely from prehospital data.

RESULTS

The study included 10,478 patients (median age 70 years; 69% male). The model achieved mean absolute errors of 7.1 bpm for heart rate, 15.7 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 10.8 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, 2.9 breaths/min for respiratory rate, and 0.62 points for Glasgow Coma Scale score. The Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.86. The model outperformed other methods, especially for R² scores and residual standard deviations, demonstrating its superior ability to predict actual vital signs values.

CONCLUSION

The multi-output regression model accurately predicted the actual values of vital signs measured at hospital arrival using limited prehospital information, demonstrating the effectiveness of advanced modeling techniques.

摘要

背景

危重症患者病情可能迅速恶化;因此,及时的院前干预以及到达医院后无缝过渡到院内治疗对于提高生存率至关重要。在日本,直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)通过提供现场护理、缩短转运时间和协助选择医疗机构来补充一般紧急医疗服务(GEMS)。到达医院时的生命体征决定初始治疗,但现有模型在预测这些生命体征方面效果不佳,尤其是在同时接受GEMS和HEMS持续干预的患者中。因此,我们开发了一种机器学习模型,以使用有限的患者特征数据和院前生命体征准确预测到达医院时生命体征的实际值。

方法

利用日本航空医疗服务协会登记处的数据,我们回顾性分析了2020年4月至2022年3月期间由HEMS转运的年龄≥18岁患者的数据。排除转运期间心脏骤停、生命体征缺失和数据不一致的患者。预测模型使用来自GEMS和HEMS接触时间的院前生命体征、人口统计学特征和干预信息。主要结局是到达医院时测量的生命体征实际值。经过数据预处理后,我们使用贝叶斯优化构建了一个深度神经网络多输出回归模型。通过使用平均绝对误差、R²分数、残差标准差和Spearman相关系数将预测值与到达医院时的实际测量值进行比较来评估模型性能。此外,将神经网络模型的性能与其他方法进行比较,即HEMS接触值和仅从院前数据得出的基于变化的预测。

结果

该研究纳入了10478例患者(中位年龄70岁;69%为男性)。该模型实现的平均绝对误差为:心率7.1次/分钟、收缩压15.7 mmHg、舒张压10.8 mmHg、呼吸频率2.9次/分钟、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为0.62分。Spearman相关系数范围为0.54至0.86。该模型优于其他方法,尤其是在R²分数和残差标准差方面,表明其在预测实际生命体征值方面具有卓越能力。

结论

多输出回归模型使用有限的院前信息准确预测了到达医院时测量的生命体征实际值,证明了先进建模技术的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/07160899ab8a/12873_2025_1233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/2e7784d4d35b/12873_2025_1233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/b56045caa643/12873_2025_1233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/07160899ab8a/12873_2025_1233_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/2e7784d4d35b/12873_2025_1233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/b56045caa643/12873_2025_1233_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a1/12076835/07160899ab8a/12873_2025_1233_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving prediction accuracy of hospital arrival vital signs using a multi-output machine learning model: a retrospective study of JSAS-registry data.使用多输出机器学习模型提高医院到达时生命体征的预测准确性:对JSAS登记数据的回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 13;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01233-9.
2
Keyword-Based Early Request for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in Acute Aortic Dissection: A Registry-Based Study.基于关键词的急性主动脉夹层直升机紧急医疗服务早期请求:一项基于登记处的研究
Air Med J. 2024 Nov-Dec;43(6):544-547. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Speed is not everything: Identifying patients who may benefit from helicopter transport despite faster ground transport.速度并非一切:确定那些尽管地面转运速度更快但可能从直升机转运中获益的患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Apr;84(4):549-557. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001769.
4
External validation of the Air Medical Prehospital Triage score for identifying trauma patients likely to benefit from scene helicopter transport.用于识别可能从现场直升机转运中获益的创伤患者的空中医疗院前分诊评分的外部验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Feb;82(2):270-279. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001326.
5
Prehospital Vital Signs Accurately Predict Initial Emergency Department Vital Signs.院前生命体征能准确预测急诊科初始生命体征。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Jun;35(3):254-259. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2000028X. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
6
Comparison of Changes in Vital Signs During Ground and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Interventions.地面和直升机紧急医疗服务与医院干预期间生命体征变化的比较。
Air Med J. 2022 Jul-Aug;41(4):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
Prehospital Time Following Traumatic Injury Is Independently Associated With the Need for In-Hospital Blood and Early Mortality for Specific Injury Types.创伤后急救前时间与特定损伤类型的院内用血需求和早期死亡率独立相关。
Air Med J. 2024 Jan-Feb;43(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
8
Outcomes after helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for major trauma--propensity score and instrumental variable analyses: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.直升机与地面紧急医疗服务用于重大创伤后的结局——倾向评分与工具变量分析:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 29;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0335-z.
9
Outcomes of prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest managed by helicopter emergency medical service personnel in Japan: a registry data analysis.日本直升机紧急医疗服务人员管理的院外创伤性心脏骤停的结局:一项登记数据分析。
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 12;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00550-9.
10
Physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service has a beneficial impact on the incidence of prehospital hypoxia and secured airways on patients with severe traumatic brain injury.配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务对严重创伤性脑损伤患者的院前低氧血症和确保气道的发生率有有益影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 15;25(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0438-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Modifications to the National Early Warning Score 2: a Scoping Review.《国家早期预警评分2的修订:一项范围综述》
BMC Med. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03943-0.
2
A novel deep learning algorithm for real-time prediction of clinical deterioration in the emergency department for a multimodal clinical decision support system.一种用于多模态临床决策支持系统的急诊科临床恶化实时预测的新型深度学习算法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80268-7.
3
Prediction of mortality among severely injured trauma patients A comparison between TRISS and machine learning-based predictive models.
严重创伤患者死亡率预测——TRISS 与基于机器学习的预测模型比较。
Injury. 2024 Aug;55(8):111702. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111702. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
A prediction model for prehospital clinical deterioration: The use of early warning scores.院前临床恶化预测模型:预警评分的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;31(11):1139-1149. doi: 10.1111/acem.14963. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
5
The data quality and applicability of a Danish prehospital electronic health record: A mixed-methods study.丹麦院前电子健康记录的数据质量和适用性:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293577. eCollection 2023.
6
Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.创伤性出血与生存链。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;31(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01088-8.
7
Comparison of Changes in Vital Signs During Ground and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Interventions.地面和直升机紧急医疗服务与医院干预期间生命体征变化的比较。
Air Med J. 2022 Jul-Aug;41(4):391-395. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
8
The association between vital signs and clinical outcomes in emergency department patients of different age categories.不同年龄段急诊科患者生命体征与临床结局的关系。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Dec;39(12):903-911. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210628. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Association of Pre-Hospital Helicopter Transport with Reduced Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury in Japan: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.日本创伤性脑损伤患者院前直升机转运与降低死亡率的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Jan;39(1-2):76-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0181. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
10
Physician-led prehospital management is associated with reduced mortality in severe blunt trauma patients: a retrospective analysis of the Japanese nationwide trauma registry.医生主导的院前管理与严重钝挫伤患者死亡率降低相关:日本全国创伤登记处的回顾性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00828-4.