Perhoniemi Riku, Blomgren Jenni
The Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Nordenskiöldinkatu 12, 00250, Helsinki, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):1277. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22431-x.
Long-term sickness absences (LTSA) are often linked to mental disorders. Up-to-date register-based evidence on the prevalence and trends of LTSA based on mental disorders is lacking, as is understanding of socioeconomic differences. This study examines the trends in prevalence of LTSA based on mental disorders in various socioeconomic groups both employed and outside employment.
Finnish 18-67 years old non-retired residents were included in yearly study populations for 2010-2023. LTSA prevalence was examined through receipt of compensated sickness allowance. Yearly age-adjusted prevalences of LTSA were calculated for six socioeconomic groups using direct standardization. Adjusting for various covariates, relative risks (RR) between socioeconomic groups in LTSA prevalences were then analysed for 2010 and 2023 using Modified Poisson regression models. All analyses were run separately for both sexes, and for all mental disorders combined, for mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and other mental disorders combined.
The prevalence of LTSA based on mental disorders increased from 2010 to 2023 among all socioeconomic groups and for both sexes, but especially among lower non-manual female employees due to anxiety disorders, and among students and unemployed persons due to mood disorders. Compared to upper non-manual employees, the higher covariate-adjusted relative risks for LTSA based on mental disorders in lower non-manual employees increased slightly during the study period (women: RRs 1,13 to 1,25; men: RRs 1,20 to 1,30). While age-group-standardized trends showed an approximately similar risk for manual workers compared to upper non-manual employees, covariate-adjusted modelling revealed a slightly lower relative risk, most apparent for anxiety disorders (RR in 2023 0,79). Entrepreneurs had a consistently lower relative risk compared to other groups.
The prevalence of long-term sickness absences due to mood and anxiety disorders have increased among all socioeconomic groups, but register data also reveals group differences in prevalences and trends. Factors related to covid-19 pandemic, intensity of job demands, and buffering resources may explain these differing trends. Employees, but also students and unemployed persons need support to curb the increase in LTSA due to mental disorders.
长期病假(LTSA)通常与精神障碍有关。目前缺乏基于登记数据的关于因精神障碍导致的长期病假患病率及趋势的最新证据,对社会经济差异的了解也不足。本研究调查了不同社会经济群体(包括在职和非在职)中因精神障碍导致的长期病假患病率趋势。
2010 - 2023年的年度研究人群纳入了芬兰18 - 67岁未退休居民。通过领取带薪病假津贴来调查长期病假患病率。使用直接标准化方法计算六个社会经济群体的年龄调整后年度长期病假患病率。在调整各种协变量后,使用修正泊松回归模型分析2010年和2023年各社会经济群体之间长期病假患病率的相对风险(RR)。所有分析按性别分别进行,针对所有精神障碍合并、情绪障碍、焦虑障碍以及其他精神障碍合并的情况。
2010年至2叭3年期间,所有社会经济群体以及男女两性中,因精神障碍导致的长期病假患病率均有所上升,但在较低非体力女性雇员中,因焦虑障碍导致的患病率上升尤为明显,在学生和失业人员中,因情绪障碍导致的患病率上升尤为明显。与较高非体力雇员相比,较低非体力雇员中因精神障碍导致的长期病假经协变量调整后的相对风险在研究期间略有增加(女性:RR从1.13增至丨.25;男性:RR从1.20增至1.30)。虽然年龄组标准化趋势显示体力劳动者与较高非体力雇员的风险大致相似,但协变量调整模型显示相对风险略低,在焦虑障碍中最为明显(2023年RR为0.79)。与其他群体相比,企业家的相对风险一直较低。
所有社会经济群体中,因情绪和焦虑障碍导致的长期病假患病率均有所上升,但登记数据也揭示了患病率和趋势的群体差异。与新冠疫情、工作需求强度和缓冲资源相关的因素可能解释了这些不同的趋势。雇员以及学生和失业人员都需要得到支持,以遏制因精神障碍导致的长期病假增加。