Solís K Helivier, Romero-Ávila M Teresa, Rincón-Heredia Ruth, Romero-Romero Sergio, Correa-Basurto José, García-Sáinz J Adolfo
Departamento de Biología Celular y Desarrollo, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ap. Postal 70-600, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Unidad de Imagenología, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ap. Postal 70-600, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 26;26(9):4123. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094123.
Comparative studies using lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and the synthetic agonist, oleoyl-methoxy glycerophosphothionate (OMPT), in cells expressing the LPA receptor revealed differences in the action of these agents. The possibility that more than one recognition cavity might exist for these ligands in the LPA receptor was considered. We performed agonist docking studies exploring the whole protein to obtain tridimensional details of the ligand-receptor interaction. Functional in cellulo experiments using mutants were also executed. Our work includes blind docking using the unrefined and refined proteins subjected to hot spot predictions. Distinct ligand protonation (charge -1 and -2) states were evaluated. One LPA recognition cavity is located near the lower surface of the receptor close to the cytoplasm (Lower Cavity). OMPT displayed an affinity for an additional identification cavity detected in the transmembrane and extracellular regions (Upper Cavity). Docking targeted to Trp102 favored binding of both ligands in the transmembrane domain near the extracellular areas (Upper Cavity), but the associating amino acids were not identical due to close sub-cavities. A receptor model was generated using AlphaFold3, which properly identified the transmembrane regions of the sequence and co-modeled the lipid environment accordingly. These two models independently generated (with and without the membrane) and adopted essentially the same conformation, validating the data obtained. A DeepSite analysis of the model predicted two main binding pockets, providing additional confidence in the predicted ligand-binding regions and support for the relevance of the docking-based interaction models. In addition, mutagenesis was performed of the amino acids of the two detected cavities. In the in cellulo studies, LPA action was much less affected by the distinct mutations than that of OMPT (which was almost abolished). Therefore, docking and functional data indicate the presence of distinct agonist binding cavities in the LPA receptor.
在表达溶血磷脂酸(LPA)受体的细胞中,使用溶血磷脂酸(LPA)和合成激动剂油酰基 - 甲氧基甘油磷硫代酸盐(OMPT)进行的比较研究揭示了这些试剂作用的差异。人们考虑了LPA受体中可能存在不止一个这些配体识别腔的可能性。我们进行了激动剂对接研究,探索整个蛋白质以获得配体 - 受体相互作用的三维细节。还进行了使用突变体的细胞内功能实验。我们的工作包括对未经精制和精制的蛋白质进行热点预测的盲对接。评估了不同的配体质子化(电荷-1和-2)状态。一个LPA识别腔位于受体靠近细胞质的下表面附近(下腔)。OMPT对在跨膜和细胞外区域检测到的另一个识别腔(上腔)表现出亲和力。针对Trp102的对接有利于两种配体在靠近细胞外区域的跨膜结构域(上腔)中的结合,但由于紧密的子腔,相关氨基酸并不相同。使用AlphaFold3生成了一个受体模型,该模型正确识别了序列的跨膜区域并相应地对脂质环境进行了共建模。这两个独立生成的模型(有膜和无膜)采用了基本相同的构象,验证了所获得的数据。对该模型的DeepSite分析预测了两个主要结合口袋,为预测的配体结合区域提供了额外的可信度,并支持基于对接的相互作用模型的相关性。此外,对两个检测到的腔的氨基酸进行了诱变。在细胞内研究中,LPA的作用受不同突变的影响比OMPT小得多(OMPT的作用几乎被消除)。因此,对接和功能数据表明LPA受体中存在不同的激动剂结合腔。