• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种拮抗细菌菌株在防治梨火疫病中的效果评估

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Antagonistic Bacteria Strains in the Management of Fire Blight.

作者信息

Zhang Jianhui, Zhang Zhidong, Wen Yue, Zhu Jing, Wufuerjiang Abudusufuer, Tian Jia

机构信息

College of Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Environmental Microbioogy, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 7;26(9):4438. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094438.

DOI:10.3390/ijms26094438
PMID:40362675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12072930/
Abstract

Fire blight, caused by , poses a significant threat to the sustainable development of the Korla Xiangli (. Yu) industry. In this study, we used multiple experimental approaches to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of three antagonistic bacterial strains-namely, Mg-7 (), Rt-10 (), and Rt-11 ()-in controlling fire blight. In vitro plate inhibition assays revealed that Mg-7 exhibited the largest inhibition zone diameter, exceeding Rt-10 and Rt-11 in this respect, suggesting its strong antifungal potential. In therapeutic tests conducted on detached leaves, Mg-7 achieved the highest control efficiency, 60.39%, while Rt-10 demonstrated the greatest efficiency (76.96%) in protective tests. Conversely, in therapeutic trials focusing on detached branches, Mg-7 showed a control efficiency of 45.90%, whereas Rt-11 exhibited the highest efficiency, 86.27%, in protective trials. Furthermore, in vitro evaluations indicated that the Mg-7 treatment significantly reduced the lesion spread area. Enzymatic analyses revealed that, in the leaf protection assay, catalase activity (CAT) demonstrated significant increases of 65.56%, 85.46%, and 45.55% under the Mg-7, RT-10, and RT-11 treatments, respectively, when compared with the EA control group on day four. Correspondingly, in the branch protection assay, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity displayed marked elevations of 62.84%, 52.06%, and 82.69% under identical experimental conditions at the same time point. These treatments not only upregulated antioxidant enzyme activities but also significantly reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) content, effectively mitigating oxidative damage while enhancing foliar and branch resistance to fire blight infection. Field trials conducted in outdoor orchards confirmed that the Mg-7 bacterial suspension provided more effective and stable control against fire blight than Rt-10 and Rt-11. Overall, Mg-7 shows significant potential for use as a biocontrol agent for managing fire blight because of its high efficacy, stability, and ability to enhance plant defense responses.

摘要

由[病原菌名称未给出]引起的火疫病,对库尔勒香梨([品种名称未给出])产业的可持续发展构成了重大威胁。在本研究中,我们采用了多种实验方法,全面评估了三种拮抗细菌菌株——即Mg - 7([菌株具体名称未给出])、Rt - 10([菌株具体名称未给出])和Rt - 11([菌株具体名称未给出])——对火疫病的防治效果。体外平板抑制试验表明,Mg - 7的抑菌圈直径最大,在这方面超过了Rt - 10和Rt - 11,表明其具有很强的抗真菌潜力。在离体叶片上进行的治疗试验中,Mg - 7的防治效果最高,为60.39%,而在保护试验中,Rt - 10表现出最高的防治效果(76.96%)。相反,在针对离体枝条的治疗试验中,Mg - 7的防治效果为45.90%,而在保护试验中,Rt - 11表现出最高的防治效果,为86.27%。此外,体外评估表明,Mg - 7处理显著减少了病斑扩展面积。酶活性分析显示,在叶片保护试验中,与第4天的EA对照组相比,在Mg - 7、RT - 10和RT - 11处理下,过氧化氢酶活性(CAT)分别显著提高了65.56%、85.46%和45.55%。相应地,在枝条保护试验中,在相同实验条件下的同一时间点,多酚氧化酶(PPO)活性显著提高了62.84%、52.06%和82.69%。这些处理不仅上调了抗氧化酶活性,还显著降低了丙二醛(MDA)含量,有效减轻了氧化损伤,同时增强了叶片和枝条对火疫病感染的抗性。在室外果园进行的田间试验证实,Mg - 7菌悬液对火疫病的防治比Rt - 10和Rt - 11更有效、更稳定。总体而言,Mg - 7因其高效、稳定以及能够增强植物防御反应,在作为防治火疫病的生物防治剂方面具有显著潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b36c5d8b19b3/ijms-26-04438-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/51cd5edd703a/ijms-26-04438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/351fb2d333df/ijms-26-04438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/bc3d76bda090/ijms-26-04438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/af9150697009/ijms-26-04438-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b5e43173a42b/ijms-26-04438-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/246093ff5f22/ijms-26-04438-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b5ba5fa3a2f1/ijms-26-04438-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/2b3925282222/ijms-26-04438-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/3dee6994f328/ijms-26-04438-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b36c5d8b19b3/ijms-26-04438-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/51cd5edd703a/ijms-26-04438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/351fb2d333df/ijms-26-04438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/bc3d76bda090/ijms-26-04438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/af9150697009/ijms-26-04438-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b5e43173a42b/ijms-26-04438-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/246093ff5f22/ijms-26-04438-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b5ba5fa3a2f1/ijms-26-04438-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/2b3925282222/ijms-26-04438-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/3dee6994f328/ijms-26-04438-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca56/12072930/b36c5d8b19b3/ijms-26-04438-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Antagonistic Bacteria Strains in the Management of Fire Blight.三种拮抗细菌菌株在防治梨火疫病中的效果评估
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 7;26(9):4438. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094438.
2
New potential bacterial antagonists for the biocontrol of fire blight disease (Erwinia amylovora) in Morocco.摩洛哥用于防治火疫病(梨火疫病菌)的新型潜在细菌拮抗微生物。
Microb Pathog. 2018 Apr;117:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
Evaluation of kasugamycin for fire blight management, effect on nontarget bacteria, and assessment of kasugamycin resistance potential in Erwinia amylovora.评价枯草芽孢杆菌素防治火疫病的效果、对非靶标细菌的影响,以及评估韧皮部土壤杆菌中枯草芽孢杆菌素抗性的潜力。
Phytopathology. 2011 Feb;101(2):192-204. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-10-0128.
4
Inhibition of Erwinia amylovora by Bacillus nakamurai.纳豆芽孢杆菌对梨火疫病菌的抑制作用。
Curr Microbiol. 2020 May;77(5):875-881. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01845-y. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Engineering of Bacteriophages Y2:: and Y2:: for Efficient Control and Rapid Detection of the Fire Blight Pathogen, Erwinia amylovora.用于高效控制和快速检测梨火疫病菌(欧文氏菌 amylovora)的噬菌体 Y2:: 和 Y2:: 的工程改造
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 May 31;83(12). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00341-17. Print 2017 Jun 15.
6
From predator to protector: WCH05 emerges as a potent biocontrol agent for fire blight.从捕食者到保护者:WCH05成为防治火疫病的有力生物防治剂。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1378288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1378288. eCollection 2024.
7
Mechanisms of antagonism of Pseudomonas fluorescens EPS62e against Erwinia amylovora, the causal agent of fire blight.荧光假单胞菌EPS62e对梨火疫病菌(引起火疫病的病原菌)的拮抗机制。
Int Microbiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):123-32.
8
Lysozyme enhances the bactericidal effect of BP100 peptide against Erwinia amylovora, the causal agent of fire blight of rosaceous plants.溶菌酶增强了BP100肽对引起蔷薇科植物火疫病的病原菌——梨火疫病菌的杀菌效果。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Feb 17;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0957-y.
9
Comparative transcriptome analysis and candidate gene mining for fire blight of Pear resistance in Korla fragrant Pear (Pyrus sinkiangensis Yü).库尔勒香梨(Pyrus sinkiangensis Yü)对梨火疫病抗性的比较转录组分析及候选基因挖掘
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):15073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00009-2.
10
L-asparaginase-driven antibiosis in Pseudomonas fluorescens EK007: A promising biocontrol strategy against fire blight.荧光假单胞菌 EK007 中 L-天冬酰胺酶驱动的抗菌作用:一种有前途的防治火疫病的生物防治策略。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Nov;281(Pt 2):136402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136402. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide characterization of AhBAG genes in peanut reveals their role in bacterial wilt resistance and hormone response.花生中AhBAG基因的全基因组特征揭示了它们在抗青枯病和激素应答中的作用。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06552-4.
2
Antagonistic control of rice immunity against distinct pathogens by the two transcription modules via salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways.两个转录模块通过水杨酸和茉莉酸途径拮抗控制水稻对不同病原体的免疫。
Dev Cell. 2024 Jun 17;59(12):1609-1622.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.03.033. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Exploration of a multifunctional biocontrol agent Streptomyces sp. JCK-8055 for the management of apple fire blight.
探索多功能生防菌链霉菌 JCK-8055 对苹果火疫病的防治作用。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Dec;108(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12874-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
4
Screening for Novel Beneficial Environmental Bacteria for an Antagonism-Based Biological Control.筛选用于基于拮抗作用的生物防治的新型有益环境细菌。
Microorganisms. 2023 Jul 13;11(7):1795. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071795.
5
Current Situation of Fire Blight in China.中国火疫病现状。
Phytopathology. 2023 Dec;113(12):2143-2151. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-23-0170-RVW. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Isolation and characterization of KD7 for the biological control of pear fire blight.用于梨火疫病生物防治的KD7的分离与特性分析
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1099664. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1099664. eCollection 2023.
7
Sodicity stress differently influences physiological traits and anti-oxidant enzymes in pear and peach cultivars.碱土胁迫对梨和桃品种的生理特性和抗氧化酶有不同的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 13;11:e14947. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14947. eCollection 2023.
8
Trichoderma: a multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture.木霉:一种多用途、对植物有益的微生物,有助于生态可持续农业。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 May;21(5):312-326. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Recent Developments in Enzymatic Antioxidant Defence Mechanism in Plants with Special Reference to Abiotic Stress.植物中酶促抗氧化防御机制的最新进展——特别提及非生物胁迫
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;10(4):267. doi: 10.3390/biology10040267.
10
Investigations into the production of volatile compounds in Korla fragrant pears (Pyrus sinkiangensis Yu).对库尔勒香梨(Pyrus sinkiangensis Yu)挥发性化合物产生的研究。
Food Chem. 2020 Jan 1;302:125337. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125337. Epub 2019 Aug 8.