• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病性黄斑水肿的计划治疗方案与实际执行治疗方案:来自太平洋研究的真实世界证据

Planned vs. Performed Treatment Regimens in Diabetic Macular Edema: Real-World Evidence from the PACIFIC Study.

作者信息

Haritoglou Christos, Iwersen Matthias, Müller Bettina, Beeke Erik, Berk Hüsnü, Grüb Matthias, Lorenz Katrin, Scheffler Martin, Ziemssen Focke

机构信息

Augenklinik Herzog Carl Theodor, Nymphenburger Str. 43, 80335 München, Germany.

Novartis Pharma GmbH, Roonstr. 25, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):3120. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093120.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14093120
PMID:40364151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12072375/
Abstract

Intravitreal injections of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are standard for diabetic macular edema (DME), yet a gap exists between clinical guidelines and actual practices. This study aimed to investigate the extent of deviation between physician-planned and actually performed treatment regimens. The PACIFIC study (NCT04847895) was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study conducted in Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. A total of 910 patients with DME receiving ranibizumab were enrolled. Physicians documented the intended treatment regimen at baseline, and actual treatment patterns were retrospectively derived from the timing of visits and injections over a 24-month observation period. Although most physicians initially planned fixed or pro re nata (PRN) regimens, 77% of pretreated and 73% of treatment-naïve patients ultimately followed a monitor and extend strategy. Treatment discontinuation was frequent (58.8% and 59.4%, respectively), and injection frequencies remained below recommended levels, although central retinal thickness improved over time. The study highlights a consistent and clinically relevant discrepancy between planned and actual treatment delivery in DME care, underscoring the need for better adherence to guideline-informed strategies in routine practice.

摘要

玻璃体内注射血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂是治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的标准方法,但临床指南与实际操作之间存在差距。本研究旨在调查医生计划的治疗方案与实际执行的治疗方案之间的偏差程度。PACIFIC研究(NCT04847895)是一项在德国、荷兰和瑞士进行的前瞻性、多中心、非干预性研究。共有910例接受雷珠单抗治疗的DME患者入组。医生在基线时记录了预期的治疗方案,并通过24个月观察期内的就诊和注射时间回顾性得出实际治疗模式。尽管大多数医生最初计划采用固定或按需(PRN)方案,但77%的经治患者和73%的初治患者最终采用了监测并延长治疗策略。治疗中断很常见(分别为58.8%和59.4%),尽管随着时间推移中心视网膜厚度有所改善,但注射频率仍低于推荐水平。该研究突出了DME治疗中计划的治疗与实际治疗之间持续存在的且具有临床相关性的差异,强调在日常实践中需要更好地遵循基于指南的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/7ad054838dec/jcm-14-03120-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/b9ec21523493/jcm-14-03120-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/5aa3f523404a/jcm-14-03120-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/40a61bc9f1c2/jcm-14-03120-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/8efbed00f03d/jcm-14-03120-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/ca8f7ba0e13b/jcm-14-03120-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/731b5d6bf644/jcm-14-03120-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/7ba3bd6d5f69/jcm-14-03120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/fdd89c8a1172/jcm-14-03120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/7ad054838dec/jcm-14-03120-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/b9ec21523493/jcm-14-03120-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/5aa3f523404a/jcm-14-03120-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/40a61bc9f1c2/jcm-14-03120-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/8efbed00f03d/jcm-14-03120-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/ca8f7ba0e13b/jcm-14-03120-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/731b5d6bf644/jcm-14-03120-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/7ba3bd6d5f69/jcm-14-03120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/fdd89c8a1172/jcm-14-03120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bad/12072375/7ad054838dec/jcm-14-03120-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Planned vs. Performed Treatment Regimens in Diabetic Macular Edema: Real-World Evidence from the PACIFIC Study.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的计划治疗方案与实际执行治疗方案:来自太平洋研究的真实世界证据
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):3120. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093120.
2
Treatment regimens for administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.用于治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的抗血管内皮生长因子药物给药治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 5;5(5):CD012208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012208.pub2.
3
Visual Outcomes Following Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema in a Pro Re Nata Protocol from Baseline: A Real-World Experience.基于基线的个体化按需治疗方案中玻璃体内雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的视力结果:真实世界经验。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 May-Jun;8(3):200-205. doi: 10.22608/APO.2018413. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Does HbA1c Level or Glomerular Filtration Rate Affect the Clinical Response to Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy (Ranibizumab or Aflibercept) in Diabetic Macular Edema? A Real-Life Experience.糖化血红蛋白水平或肾小球滤过率是否会影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者对内皮生长因子治疗(雷珠单抗或阿柏西普)的临床反应?一项真实病例经验。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):2657-2670. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00758-1. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro re nata Regimens of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study from Routine Clinical Practice.雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗并延长方案与按需给药方案治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的比较研究:一项来自常规临床实践的比较研究
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Sep;13(9):2343-2355. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00983-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
Individualized treat-and-extend regime for optimization of real-world vision outcome and improved patients' persistence.个体化治疗-延长方案,优化真实世界的视力结局,提高患者的依从性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01397-x.
7
One-Year Functional and Morphological Prognosis After Intravitreal Injection Treatments According to Different Morphological Patterns of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life: MARMASIA Study Group Report No.13.根据真实生活中不同形态的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的形态学模式,玻璃体内注射治疗后一年的功能和形态预后:MARMASIA 研究组报告第 13 号。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):460-467. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2324450. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
8
Treat-and-extend versus alternate dosing strategies with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents to treat center involving diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 2,346 eyes.抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的治疗和延长与交替剂量策略:2346 只眼的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep-Oct;67(5):1346-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Treat-and-Extend vs. Pro Re Nata Regimen of Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema-A Two-Year Matched Comparative Study.雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的按需治疗与延长治疗方案——一项为期两年的配对比较研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 25;8:781421. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781421. eCollection 2021.
10
Vitrectomy as an Adjunct to Treat-and-Extend Anti-VEGF Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema: The Vitrectomy in Diabetic Macular Oedema (VIDEO) Randomized Clinical Trial.玻璃体切割术作为辅助治疗和延长抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的方法:糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的玻璃体切除术(VIDEO)随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;142(9):837-844. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2777.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the factors influencing the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a qualitative interview study using the COM-B model.探索影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者及时进行玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗的因素:一项使用COM-B模型的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12379-4.
2
Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子单药治疗与抗血管内皮生长因子联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2679-2689. doi: 10.1111/dom.16270. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Diabetic Retinopathy Preferred Practice Pattern®.
糖尿病视网膜病变首选诊疗模式®
Ophthalmology. 2025 Apr;132(4):P75-P162. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.12.020. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
How intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor initial dosing impacts patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema.玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子初始给药如何影响糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的预后。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03797-9.
5
Improving Clinical Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: Insights from a Global Survey of Patients, Healthcare Providers, and Clinic Staff.改善糖尿病性黄斑水肿的临床管理:来自全球患者、医疗服务提供者和诊所工作人员调查的见解
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):229-246. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01060-4. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
6
Long-term Treatment Patterns for Diabetic Macular Edema: Up to 6-Year Follow-up in the IRIS® Registry.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的长期治疗模式:IRIS® 注册研究长达 6 年的随访结果。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Nov;8(11):1074-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.05.017. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
7
Impact of retinal fluid in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with anti-VEGF in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中,抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的视网膜液影响。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;58(4):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Treatment patterns and persistence rates with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema in the UK: A real-world study.英国抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的治疗模式和持续率:一项真实世界研究。
Diabet Med. 2022 Apr;39(4):e14746. doi: 10.1111/dme.14746. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Impact on visual acuity and psychological outcomes of ranibizumab and subsequent treatment for diabetic macular oedema in Japan (MERCURY).雷珠单抗治疗对日本糖尿病黄斑水肿患者视力和心理结局的影响(MERCURY)
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;260(2):477-487. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05308-8. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
ETOILE: Real-World Evidence of 24 Months of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Patients with Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema.ETOILE:雷珠单抗0.5毫克治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿所致视力损害患者24个月的真实世界证据。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 3;15:2307-2315. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S313081. eCollection 2021.