Aydoğdu Yunushan Furkan, Gülçek Emre, Büyükkasap Çağrı, Akın Murat
Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Clinic of General Surgery, Polatlı Duatepe State Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Turk J Surg. 2025 May 30;41(2):168-173. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.2025-3-25. Epub 2025 May 14.
This study aimed to compare preoperative, intraoperative, and tumor characteristics between patients undergoing emergency and elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer. Despite the worsened prognosis of emergency colorectal cancer cases, studies on right colon cancer remain limited.
This retrospective study included 356 patients who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer between January 2015 and April 2023. Patients were categorized into emergency (n=93) and elective (n=263) groups. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and surgical details were analyzed. Binary logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of emergency surgery.
Age (p=0.435) and gender distribution (p=0.853) were similar between groups. However, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were higher in the emergency group (p=0.001), while Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores showed no significant difference (p=0.169). T4 (p<0.001), N1 (p=0.008), and M1 stages (p<0.001) were significantly more frequent in the emergency group, along with higher tumor perforation rates (34.4% vs. 1.9%, p<0.001). Open surgery was more common in the emergency group (p=0.005). While total lymph node yield was similar (p=0.501), the number of metastatic lymph nodes was higher in the emergency group (p=0.008). Logistic regression identified higher ASA score, advanced T, N, M stages, tumor perforation, and tumor size as predictors of emergency surgery.
Patients undergoing emergency surgery for right colon cancer have more advanced disease, higher tumor perforation rates, and poorer prognostic factors. Laparoscopic surgery was less utilized, which indicates technical challenges. Early diagnosis and screening strategies may reduce emergency interventions and improve outcomes.
本研究旨在比较接受急诊手术和择期手术的右侧结肠癌患者的术前、术中和肿瘤特征。尽管急诊结直肠癌病例的预后较差,但关于右结肠癌的研究仍然有限。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年1月至2023年4月期间接受右侧结肠癌手术的356例患者。患者被分为急诊组(n=93)和择期组(n=263)。分析了人口统计学数据、肿瘤特征和手术细节。应用二元逻辑回归分析确定急诊手术的独立预测因素。
两组患者的年龄(p=0.435)和性别分布(p=0.853)相似。然而,急诊组的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分更高(p=0.001),而查尔森合并症指数(CCI)评分无显著差异(p=0.169)。急诊组中T4期(p<0.001)、N1期(p=0.008)和M1期(p<0.001)的发生率明显更高,肿瘤穿孔率也更高(34.4%对1.9%,p<0.001)。急诊组开腹手术更为常见(p=0.005)。虽然总的淋巴结获取数量相似(p=0.501),但急诊组转移淋巴结的数量更高(p=0.008)。逻辑回归分析确定较高的ASA评分、T、N、M分期进展、肿瘤穿孔和肿瘤大小是急诊手术的预测因素。
接受右侧结肠癌急诊手术的患者疾病进展更严重,肿瘤穿孔率更高,预后因素更差。腹腔镜手术的使用率较低,这表明存在技术挑战。早期诊断和筛查策略可能会减少急诊干预并改善预后。