• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social Determinants of Health-Related Outcomes in an Intervention Following Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.首次植入植入式心脏复律除颤器后干预措施中与健康相关结果的社会决定因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039238. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039238. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.对不同患者群体中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的效果和成本相关证据的综述,以及在英国背景下对这些群体的成本效益和成本效用进行建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270.
3
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a systematic review of comparative effectiveness and safety.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器:比较有效性和安全性的系统评价。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):808-823. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14249. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.多方面行为干预以提高成人局部青光眼治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.
5
Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies.皮下与经静脉植入式心脏除颤器治疗的比较:随机试验和倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024756. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者室性心律失常的导管消融:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Mar;39(3):250-262. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
8
Implantable cardioverter/defibrillators for primary prevention in dilated cardiomyopathy post-DANISH: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.植入型心律转复除颤器在扩张型心肌病中的一级预防:DANISH 试验后的更新荟萃分析和随机对照试验的系统评价。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):501-513. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1079-0. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Brugada Syndrome: A 30-Year Single-Center Experience.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗Brugada综合征:30年单中心经验
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;11(6):1174-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
10
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Multidisciplinary Electrophysiology-Psychology Ventricular Arrhythmia Clinic.多学科电生理学-心理学室性心律失常患者报告结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e025301. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025301. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Sex-specific differences in outcome and risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.性别对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者室性心律失常结局和危险分层的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3726-3736. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13444. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Determining factors in the retention of physicians in rural and underdeveloped areas: a systematic review.影响农村和欠发达地区医生留用的因素:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Oct 23;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01279-7.
4
Multisymptom Profile Predicts Increased Risk of Poor Outcomes After Initial Placement of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.多症状谱预测初始植入式心脏复律除颤器后不良结局风险增加。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Mar;59(3):658-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Patient plus partner trial: A randomized controlled trial of 2 interventions to improve outcomes after an initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.患者加伴侣试验:一项比较两种干预措施以改善初始植入式心脏复律除颤器后结局的随机对照试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Mar;16(3):453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Persistent sex disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗中持续存在的性别差异。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1150-1157. doi: 10.1111/pace.13435. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Association between socioeconomic factors and ICD implantation in a publicly financed health care system: a Danish nationwide study.社会经济因素与公共资助医疗体系中 ICD 植入的关联:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1129-1137. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux223.
8
Sex differences in outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: combined registry data from eleven European countries.原发性预防植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的结局中的性别差异:来自 11 个欧洲国家的联合登记数据。
Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):963-970. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux176.
9
Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms.全国代表性样本中抑郁症的性别差异:诊断与症状的荟萃分析
Psychol Bull. 2017 Aug;143(8):783-822. doi: 10.1037/bul0000102. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death With Device Therapy in Urban and Rural Populations.城乡人群中使用器械治疗对心脏性猝死的一级预防
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;33(4):437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.10.020. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

首次植入植入式心脏复律除颤器后干预措施中与健康相关结果的社会决定因素。

Social Determinants of Health-Related Outcomes in an Intervention Following Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.

作者信息

Streur Megan M, Auld Jonathan P, Chang Wei-Lun, Choupani Fatemeh, Zheng Tao, Frazier Elizabeth, Liberato Ana Carolina Sauer, Pike Kenneth C, Thompson Elaine A, Dougherty Cynthia M

机构信息

School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics University of Washington Seattle WA USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039238. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039238. Epub 2025 May 14.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.039238
PMID:40365845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12184609/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant rates and survival to hospital discharge exist, negatively impacting Black individuals, women, or people with lower socioeconomic status. This study examined if social determinants of health (SDOH) were associated with ICD shocks, all-cause hospitalization, death, or patient-reported outcomes during the first year following an initial ICD.

METHODS

This secondary analysis used data from a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial of a post-ICD patient intervention. Participants were followed for 1 year, and outcomes included ICD shocks, hospitalizations, death, physical function, psychological adjustment, and self-efficacy. SDOH indicators included age, biological sex, race and ethnicity, education level, employment status, household income, and rural/urban residence. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's , and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine differences in outcomes by SDOH across the first year after ICD implant.

RESULTS

Participants (N=301) were aged 64±12 years; 1% Asian/Pacific Islander, 4% Black, 2% Latinx, 2% Native American/Alaskan, and 91% White; 74% men; 87% urban residents; 65% retired/disabled/unemployed; 45% household income <$50 000/year; and 48% high school/vocational education or less. No significant associations were observed between SDOH and ICD shocks, hospitalization, or death. Physical health improved less for individuals with household income <$50 000 (<0.001), while White participants (=0.03) and rural residents (=0.01) showed a greater reduction in ICD concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

SDOH were not associated with the incidence of ICD shocks, hospitalization, or death in the first year after receipt of an initial ICD. There were limited differences in the change in patient-reported outcomes over time by SDOH.

摘要

背景

植入式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)植入率及出院生存率存在差异,对黑人、女性或社会经济地位较低的人群产生了负面影响。本研究探讨了健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)与首次植入ICD后第一年的ICD电击、全因住院、死亡或患者报告结局之间是否存在关联。

方法

本二次分析使用了一项ICD术后患者干预的比较有效性随机对照试验的数据。对参与者进行了1年的随访,结局包括ICD电击、住院、死亡、身体功能、心理调适和自我效能感。SDOH指标包括年龄、生物性别、种族和民族、教育水平、就业状况、家庭收入以及农村/城市居住情况。采用描述性统计、Pearson's检验和多因素逻辑回归分析来研究ICD植入后第一年SDOH在结局方面的差异。

结果

参与者(N = 301)年龄为64±12岁;1%为亚太岛民,4%为黑人,2%为拉丁裔,2%为美洲原住民/阿拉斯加人,91%为白人;74%为男性;87%为城市居民;65%退休/残疾/失业;45%家庭收入<50000美元/年;48%接受过高中/职业教育或更低水平教育。未观察到SDOH与ICD电击、住院或死亡之间存在显著关联。家庭收入<50000美元的个体身体健康改善较少(<0.001),而白人参与者(=0.03)和农村居民(=0.01)对ICD的担忧减少幅度更大。

结论

SDOH与首次接受ICD后第一年的ICD电击、住院或死亡发生率无关。SDOH在患者报告结局随时间变化方面的差异有限。