Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jul;106(7):501-513. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1079-0. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is frequent in patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) device therapy is currently used for primary prevention. However, publication of the DANISH trial has recently given reason for doubt, showing no significant improvement in all-cause mortality in comparison to contemporary medical therapy.
We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing ICD therapy to medical therapy (MT) for primary prevention in DCM. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary analyses were performed on sudden cardiac death, cardiovascular death and non-cardiac death.
Five trials including a total of 2992 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Compared to contemporary medical treatment there was a significant mortality reduction with ICD device therapy [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.93; p = 0.006]. SCD was decreased significantly (OR 0.43, CI 0.27-0.69; p = 0.0004), while cardiovascular death and non-cardiac death showed no differences. Sensitivity analyses showed no influence of amiodarone therapy on overall results. Analysis of MT details revealed the DANISH population to adhere the most to current guideline recommendations. In addition, it was the only study including a substantial amount of CRT devices (58%).
Our meta-analysis of all available randomized evidence shows a survival benefit of ICD therapy for primary prevention in DCM. DANISH results suggest an attenuation of this ICD advantage when compared to contemporary medical and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Until larger trials have confirmed this finding, ICD therapy should remain the recommendation for primary prevention of SCD in DCM.
心力衰竭患者由于扩张型心肌病(DCM)经常会发生心源性猝死(SCD)。植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)装置治疗目前用于一级预防。然而,DANISH 试验的发表最近引起了人们的怀疑,与当代医学治疗相比,它并没有显著改善全因死亡率。
我们对所有比较 ICD 治疗与医学治疗(MT)用于 DCM 一级预防的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要分析为心源性猝死、心血管死亡和非心源性死亡。
共有五项试验,共纳入 2992 例患者,纳入了汇总分析。与当代医学治疗相比,ICD 设备治疗显著降低了死亡率[比值比(OR)0.77,95%置信区间(CI)0.64-0.93;p=0.006]。SCD 明显降低(OR 0.43,CI 0.27-0.69;p=0.0004),而心血管死亡和非心源性死亡无差异。敏感性分析显示胺碘酮治疗对总体结果没有影响。对 MT 细节的分析表明,DANISH 人群最符合当前指南建议。此外,它是唯一一项包括大量 CRT 设备(58%)的研究。
我们对所有现有随机证据的荟萃分析表明,ICD 治疗对 DCM 的一级预防具有生存获益。DANISH 结果表明,与当代医学和心脏再同步治疗相比,这种 ICD 优势有所减弱。在更大规模的试验证实这一发现之前,ICD 治疗应仍然是 DCM 心源性猝死一级预防的推荐治疗方法。