• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撒哈拉以南非洲地区感染艾滋病毒女性对人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的接受度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling among women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Abodunrin Olunike Rebecca, Akinsolu Folahanmi Tomiwa, Ola Oluwabukola Mary, Olagunju Mobolaji Timothy, Ferife Vivienne, Lukwa Akim Tafadzwa, Lawal Ishak Kayode, Eleje George Uchenna, Ezechi Oliver Chukwujekwu

机构信息

Center for Reproduction and Population Health Studies, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 14;5(5):e0004605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004605. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004605
PMID:40367209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12077793/
Abstract

HPV self-sampling has the potential to improve early detection of cervical cancer among women living with HIV (WLHIV), but its acceptability varies, creating implementation challenges, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to assess the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among WLHIV. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Academic Medical Ultimate, Cochrane databases, and Google Scholar. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022299781). Inclusion criteria were based on population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Statistical analysis was done with R Studio version 4.3.2, and data abstraction was performed in Microsoft Excel. The analysis included 14 studies on the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among WLHIV. The overall acceptability rate was 73%. The pooled data showed that 94% felt comfortable with self-sampling, 72% found it easy to use, 10% reported pain, 14% felt embarrassed, and 41% felt confident about the process. The study found that a majority of WLHIV accepted HPV self-sampling, a higher rate than in the general female population. Many participants had concerns about the method's efficacy. This indicates that while WLHIV generally views self-sampling positively, additional education and support are needed to improve their confidence in its accuracy and reliability.

摘要

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样有潜力改善对感染艾滋病毒女性(WLHIV)宫颈癌的早期检测,但它的可接受性各不相同,这带来了实施方面的挑战,尤其是在撒哈拉以南非洲地区。本研究旨在评估WLHIV对HPV自我采样的可接受性。我们检索了PubMed、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、学术医学大全、考克兰数据库和谷歌学术。该综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号CRD42022299781)登记。纳入标准基于人群、干预措施、对照和结果。使用R Studio 4.3.2版本进行统计分析,并在Microsoft Excel中进行数据提取。分析纳入了14项关于WLHIV对HPV自我采样可接受性的研究。总体可接受率为73%。汇总数据显示,94%的人对自我采样感到自在,72%的人觉得其易于使用,10%的人报告有疼痛,14%的人感到尴尬,41%的人对该过程有信心。研究发现,大多数感染艾滋病毒女性接受HPV自我采样,这一比例高于一般女性人群。许多参与者担心该方法的有效性。这表明,虽然感染艾滋病毒女性总体上对自我采样持积极看法,但仍需要更多教育和支持,以增强她们对其准确性和可靠性的信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/05f5ca1dc932/pgph.0004605.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2e6c0c7e0f0a/pgph.0004605.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/1f794c7d5826/pgph.0004605.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/a24fa13075ca/pgph.0004605.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/770b441b6d24/pgph.0004605.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2da54ec52e4c/pgph.0004605.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/a724c37527ac/pgph.0004605.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/727c639a55e9/pgph.0004605.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/7cfb56d681a9/pgph.0004605.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2405d3e5c972/pgph.0004605.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/503143662410/pgph.0004605.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/da83d509ba44/pgph.0004605.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/42f69b892149/pgph.0004605.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/b990c0f86d64/pgph.0004605.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/5f4a2be09b46/pgph.0004605.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2f3ca683d68c/pgph.0004605.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/accd7a1f4490/pgph.0004605.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/05f5ca1dc932/pgph.0004605.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2e6c0c7e0f0a/pgph.0004605.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/1f794c7d5826/pgph.0004605.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/a24fa13075ca/pgph.0004605.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/770b441b6d24/pgph.0004605.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2da54ec52e4c/pgph.0004605.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/a724c37527ac/pgph.0004605.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/727c639a55e9/pgph.0004605.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/7cfb56d681a9/pgph.0004605.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2405d3e5c972/pgph.0004605.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/503143662410/pgph.0004605.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/da83d509ba44/pgph.0004605.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/42f69b892149/pgph.0004605.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/b990c0f86d64/pgph.0004605.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/5f4a2be09b46/pgph.0004605.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/2f3ca683d68c/pgph.0004605.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/accd7a1f4490/pgph.0004605.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/633e/12077793/05f5ca1dc932/pgph.0004605.g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling among women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区感染艾滋病毒女性对人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的接受度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 14;5(5):e0004605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004605. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Knowledge of HPV/cervical cancer and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among women living with HIV: A scoping review.感染艾滋病毒女性对人乳头瘤病毒/宫颈癌的认知及人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的可接受性:一项范围综述
Curr Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(1):e73-e82. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3855. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
4
Human papillomavirus self-sampling versus standard clinician-sampling for cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.撒哈拉以南非洲地区宫颈癌筛查中人类乳头瘤病毒自我采样与标准临床医生采样的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Infect Agent Cancer. 2021 Jun 19;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13027-021-00380-5.
5
"The best thing is that you are doing it for yourself" - perspectives on acceptability and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among cervical cancer screening clients in Tanzania: a qualitative pilot study.“最棒的是,你是在为自己做这件事”——坦桑尼亚宫颈癌筛查服务对象对 HPV 自我采样可接受性和可行性的观点:一项定性试点研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Mar 31;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00917-7.
6
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of self-sampling devices for human Papillomavirus detection: A systematic review.用于检测人乳头瘤病毒的自我采样装置的诊断准确性和可接受性比较:一项系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 4;38:102590. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102590. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening strategies for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) among women living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者中,宫颈癌筛查策略对高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2+/CIN3+)的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 27;53:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101645. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Sub-Saharan African Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲国家女性高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的流行状况及基因型分布:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;10:890880. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.890880. eCollection 2022.
9
Exploring the role of cervicovaginal microbiota as risk factor for cervical cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis : By.探索宫颈阴道微生物群作为撒哈拉以南非洲地区宫颈癌危险因素的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:作者。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03688-1.
10
Precancerous Cervical Lesion Among HIV-Positive Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区 HIV 阳性妇女的癌前宫颈病变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Control. 2019 Jan-Dec;26(1):1073274819845872. doi: 10.1177/1073274819845872.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of a vaginal self-collection device versus clinician collected cervical samples for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus.阴道自我采集装置与临床医生采集的宫颈样本在检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒方面的性能比较
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Mar 27;41:102705. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102705. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Acceptability of HPV self-collection: A qualitative study of Black women living with type II diabetes and social vulnerability.人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的可接受性:对患有II型糖尿病的黑人女性及社会弱势群体的定性研究
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2024 Feb 25;35:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100331. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Confronting the human papillomavirus-HIV intersection: Cervical cytology implications for Kenyan women living with HIV.
直面人乳头瘤病毒与艾滋病病毒的交叉问题:宫颈细胞学检查对肯尼亚感染艾滋病病毒女性的影响
South Afr J HIV Med. 2023 Oct 27;24(1):1508. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v24i1.1508. eCollection 2023.
4
High-risk human papillomavirus infection among Nigerian women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.尼日利亚女性人群中的高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Jul;51(7):3000605231182884. doi: 10.1177/03000605231182884.
5
HPV self-sampling versus healthcare provider collection on the effect of cervical cancer screening uptake and costs in LMIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HPV 自我采样与医疗保健提供者采集对中低收入国家宫颈癌筛查参与度和成本的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 22;12(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02252-y.
6
Two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling: an economic evaluation.两种 HPV 初筛宫颈癌的自我采样方法与临床医生采样的比较:一项经济评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 6;13(6):e068940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068940.
7
Barriers and facilitators of HPV vaccination in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲 HPV 疫苗接种的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15842-1.
8
HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature.宫颈癌筛查中基于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的自我采样:文献中当前证据的最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;15(6):1669. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061669.
9
The preference of women living with HIV for the HPV self-sampling of urine at a rural HIV clinic in Uganda.乌干达一家农村艾滋病诊所中感染艾滋病毒女性对人乳头瘤病毒尿液自我采样的偏好。
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 2;37(1):414. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v37i1.414. eCollection 2022.
10
Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查接受度的障碍:系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):509-527. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac104.