Elgehiny Amr, Quraishi Mariam Z, Yadav Aravind, Srivaths Lakshmi V, Okeleji Olayinka, Brown Deborah L, Menon Neethu M
Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
CUNY School of Medicine, New York, NY.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;47(5):e155-e160. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000003052. Epub 2025 May 14.
This study aims to review institutional algorithms for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and acute chest syndrome (ACS) in pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD), comparing them to each other and to national recommendations. Algorithms collected from children's hospitals across the country were compared with recommendations made by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2014 and the American Society of Hematology 2020 regarding management of VOC/ACS in SCD. Review of 37 VOC and 17 ACS algorithms from 40 children's hospitals showed that most followed national guidelines for diagnostic evaluation of VOC/ACS. Parenteral opioids and NSAIDs were recommended by all VOC algorithms, with variations in dosing and administration. Intranasal fentanyl was recommended by 31 algorithms. Incentive spirometry was included in 16 of 17 ACS algorithms, but only in 11 of 37 VOC algorithms. Antibiotics were recommended by all ACS algorithms, but 4 used regimens were different from national recommendations. Most ACS algorithms had recommendations regarding transfusion, but with considerable variability. Intravenous fluid management strategies were highly variable, and hypotonic fluids were recommended in 6 VOC and 4 ACS algorithms. Overall, internal algorithms for pediatric SCD showed variability compared with each other and with national guidelines, likely due to the lack of robust evidence supporting specific recommendations.
本研究旨在回顾儿科镰状细胞病(SCD)中血管闭塞性危机(VOC)和急性胸综合征(ACS)的机构算法,将它们相互比较并与国家建议进行比较。从全国儿童医院收集的算法与美国国立心肺血液研究所2014年和美国血液学会2020年关于SCD中VOC/ACS管理的建议进行了比较。对来自40家儿童医院的37种VOC算法和17种ACS算法的回顾表明,大多数遵循了VOC/ACS诊断评估的国家指南。所有VOC算法均推荐使用胃肠外阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药,给药剂量和方式存在差异。31种算法推荐使用鼻内芬太尼。17种ACS算法中有16种包括激励肺活量测定,但37种VOC算法中只有11种包括。所有ACS算法均推荐使用抗生素,但4种使用的方案与国家建议不同。大多数ACS算法都有关于输血的建议,但差异很大。静脉输液管理策略差异很大,6种VOC算法和4种ACS算法推荐使用低渗液体。总体而言,儿科SCD的内部算法相互之间以及与国家指南相比存在差异,这可能是由于缺乏支持特定建议的有力证据。