Drattell Julia D, Fu Samuel D, Shumski Eric J, Prato Thomas A, Lynall Robert C, Devos Hannes, Schmidt Julianne D
UGA Concussion Research Center, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Laboratory for Advanced Rehabilitation Research in Simulation, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025 May 14:1-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2497066.
Concussed patients present multiple neurocognitive and motor impairments including slowed reaction time (RT), a function essential to driving. We compared driving RT between concussed and non-concussed individuals across their concussion recovery (aim 1) and explored whether clinical concussion outcomes were correlated with driving RT uniquely in the concussion group (aim 2).
We recruited collegiate athletes (26 concussed and 23 age- and sex-matched controls) to complete the sport concussion assessment tool (SCAT5), a computerized neurocognitive test (CNS Vital Signs), and a driving simulation across 3 timepoints: ≤72 h, asymptomatic, and unrestricted medical clearance. RTs were recorded in response to 4 unanticipated driving events. CNSVS included 10 measures of cognitive function. General linear mixed models assessed interaction between group and time for aim 1 and group and concussion assessment outcome for aim 2 (α = 0.05). Pairwise comparisons with Cohen's d values were used following significant interactions and main effects.
There was a significant main effect for timepoint, such that pedestrian RT was slower at the ≤72-h timepoint relative to both the asymptomatic (p value = 0.023) and unrestricted medical clearance (p- value = 0.022). There were no other significant group-by-timepoint interaction or timepoint main effects for yellow stoplight RT (p-value range = 0.334-0.798), vehicle incursion RT (p-value range = 0.234-0.925) or vehicle cross RT (p-value range = 0.177-0.364). There was no significant group main effect (p-value range = 0.077-0.955), assessment outcome main effect (p-value range = 0.099-0.999) or interaction (p-value range = 0.103-0.998) for predicting any of the RTs, except for executive function ( = 0.046), motor speed ( = 0.006), and psychomotor speed ( = 0.027) predicting vehicle cross RT regardless of group.
This study demonstrates that driving RT may not differ between acutely concussed and healthy individuals or may not be detected on a short, simulated drive. Current clinical concussion outcomes poorly relate to driving RT. More research is needed to determine when it is safe to return to driving post-concussion.
脑震荡患者存在多种神经认知和运动障碍,包括反应时间(RT)减慢,而反应时间是驾驶所必需的一项功能。我们比较了脑震荡患者和未患脑震荡者在脑震荡恢复过程中的驾驶反应时间(目标1),并探讨了在脑震荡组中临床脑震荡结果是否与驾驶反应时间存在独特的相关性(目标2)。
我们招募了大学生运动员(26名脑震荡患者和23名年龄及性别匹配的对照组),让他们在三个时间点完成运动脑震荡评估工具(SCAT5)、计算机化神经认知测试(CNS生命体征)以及驾驶模拟测试:≤72小时、无症状以及获得无限制医疗许可。记录对4种意外驾驶事件的反应时间。CNSVS包括10项认知功能测量指标。一般线性混合模型评估目标1中组与时间之间的交互作用以及目标2中组与脑震荡评估结果之间的交互作用(α = 0.05)。在有显著交互作用和主效应之后,使用Cohen's d值进行成对比较。
时间点存在显著主效应,即相对于无症状(p值 = 0.023)和无限制医疗许可(p值 = 0.022)这两个时间点,在≤72小时这个时间点行人反应时间较慢。对于黄色停车信号灯反应时间(p值范围 = 0.334 - 0.798)、车辆侵入反应时间(p值范围 = 0.234 - 0.925)或车辆交叉反应时间(p值范围 = 0.177 - 0.364),没有其他显著的组×时间点交互作用或时间点主效应。除了执行功能(p = 0.046)、运动速度(p = 0.006)和精神运动速度(p = 0.027)无论在哪个组都能预测车辆交叉反应时间外,对于预测任何反应时间,均没有显著的组主效应(p值范围 = 0.077 - 0.955)、评估结果主效应(p值范围 = 0.099 - 0.999)或交互作用(p值范围 = 0.103 - 0.998)。
本研究表明,急性脑震荡个体与健康个体之间的驾驶反应时间可能没有差异,或者在短时间的模拟驾驶中可能无法检测到差异。目前的临床脑震荡结果与驾驶反应时间的相关性较差。需要更多研究来确定脑震荡后何时恢复驾驶是安全的。