Ferri Burgel Camila, Freitas Isadora Martins, de Carvalho Bruna Zardo Oliveira, Costa-Pereira Jarson P, Fayh Ana Paula Trussardi, Moraes Silva Flávia
Health Science Postgraduate Program from Federal University of Health Sciences from Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Federal University of Health Sciences from Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Clin Nutr. 2025 Jul;50:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2025.04.030. Epub 2025 May 2.
Muscle quality index (MQI) is computed as the ratio of strength to muscle mass (MM), estimating functional muscle quality. Imaging methods are used to assess MM and compute the MQI, being challenging for use in clinical practice. Anthropometry has become an alternative marker of MM that can be used within MQI, although few studies have explored this approach.
To evaluate the prognostic value of mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC cm), corrected arm muscle area (AMA cm), and calf circumference adjusted for body mass index (CC-BMI adjusted cm) as markers of MM within MQI in predicting adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients.
A secondary analysis was conducted on a cohort with prospective data collection. Adult and older hospitalized patients were evaluated up to 48 h after hospitalization. MQI was calculated as the ratio of handgrip strength (HGS) to MM evaluated by MAMC (MQI), MAM (MQI), and CC-BMI adjusted (MQI). The outcomes of interest were prolonged hospital stay, in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Logistic and Cox regression analyses adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index, ethnicity, surgery, and sex were performed.
554 patients were included (55.2 ± 14.9 years, 52.9 % of males, 518 had MACM and MAM available). Each one-unit MQI increase reduced the risk by 32 %, 44 %, and 33 % in prolonged hospitalization for MQI (RR = 0.68, 95 % CI 0.52-0.90), MQI (RR = 0.56, 95 % CI 0.35-0.89), and MQI (RR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.46-0.96). A higher MQI was an independent predictor of a lower risk of 6-month mortality after discharge (RR = 0.26, 95 % CI 0.08-0.84).
Higher MQI values using anthropometric markers (MAMC, AMA, and CC-BMI) were inversely associated with adverse in-hospital and 6-month after-discharge outcomes, reinforcing its use as a muscle-related prognostic index.
肌肉质量指数(MQI)通过力量与肌肉量(MM)的比值计算得出,用于评估功能性肌肉质量。成像方法用于评估肌肉量并计算MQI,但在临床实践中使用具有挑战性。人体测量学已成为肌肉量的替代指标,可用于MQI计算,不过很少有研究探索这种方法。
评估上臂中部肌肉周长(MAMC,单位:厘米)、校正后的手臂肌肉面积(AMA,单位:平方厘米)以及根据体重指数调整后的小腿周长(CC-BMI调整后,单位:厘米)作为MQI中肌肉量指标在预测住院患者不良结局方面的预后价值。
对一个前瞻性数据收集队列进行二次分析。对成年及老年住院患者在住院后48小时内进行评估。MQI计算为握力(HGS)与通过MAMC评估的肌肉量(MQI)、AMA评估的肌肉量(MQI)以及CC-BMI调整后评估的肌肉量(MQI)的比值。感兴趣的结局包括住院时间延长、住院期间及6个月死亡率。进行了经Charlson合并症指数、种族、手术和性别调整的逻辑回归和Cox回归分析。
纳入554例患者(年龄55.2±14.9岁,男性占52.9%,518例有MACM和AMA数据)。对于MQI(RR = 0.68,95%CI 0.52 - 0.90)、MQI(RR = 0.56,95%CI 0.35 - 0.89)和MQI(RR = 0.67,95%CI 0.46 - 0.96),每增加一个单位的MQI,住院时间延长的风险分别降低32%、4%和33%。较高的MQI是出院后6个月死亡风险较低的独立预测因素(RR = 0.26,95%CI 0.08 - 0.84)。
使用人体测量指标(MAMC、AMA和CC-BMI)得出的较高MQI值与不良的住院及出院后6个月结局呈负相关,强化了其作为肌肉相关预后指标的应用。