Mahmud R, Denker S T, Lehmann M H, Addas A, Akhtar M
Am Heart J. 1985 Sep;110(3):568-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90076-6.
The mechanism of unidirectional retrograde atrioventricular (AV) nodal block remains largely unknown. In this study, factors determining the reversal of the unidirectional block by atropine were evaluated in 12 patients who had no demonstrable ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction during ventricular pacing. Six patients demonstrated 1:1 VA conduction after atropine (group I), while the remaining six patients continued to show VA block (group II). During the control study there was no significant difference in the sinus cycle length and AH interval between the two groups. The percent decrease in sinus cycle length after atropine was also similar in groups I and II (i.e., 23 +/- 12 and 26 +/- 6, respectively). The effect on antegrade AV nodal conduction (i.e., the percent decrease in AH interval), however, was significantly greater in group I (24 +/- 9) as compared to group II (9 +/- 5) (p less than 0.004). The onset of VA conduction appeared to correlate with the improvement of antegrade conduction. The ratio of these two effects of atropine (i.e., percent decrease in AH interval to percent decrease in sinus cycle length) was higher when VA conduction was first demonstrated in group I (2.3 +/- 1.1) than at the maximal effect of atropine (1.2 +/- 0.3), reflecting a relatively greater decrease in sinus cycle length. Three of six group I patients redeveloped VA block at maximal effect of atropine. The results suggest a functional and dynamic nature of the unidirectional AV nodal block, possibly caused by vagal influence exaggerating the well-known directional asymmetry of AV nodal conduction in man.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
单向逆行房室结阻滞的机制在很大程度上仍不清楚。在本研究中,对12例心室起搏时无明显室房(VA)传导的患者评估了决定阿托品逆转单向阻滞的因素。6例患者在使用阿托品后出现1:1 VA传导(I组),而其余6例患者继续表现为VA阻滞(II组)。在对照研究中,两组之间的窦性周期长度和AH间期无显著差异。I组和II组使用阿托品后窦性周期长度的缩短百分比也相似(分别为23±12和26±6)。然而,与II组(9±5)相比,I组对房室结前传传导的影响(即AH间期的缩短百分比)显著更大(24±9)(p<0.004)。VA传导的出现似乎与前传传导的改善相关。当I组首次出现VA传导时,阿托品这两种效应的比值(即AH间期缩短百分比与窦性周期长度缩短百分比)高于阿托品最大效应时(2.3±1.1对1.2±0.3),反映出窦性周期长度相对更大的缩短。I组6例患者中有3例在阿托品最大效应时再次出现VA阻滞。结果提示单向房室结阻滞具有功能性和动态性,可能是由于迷走神经影响夸大了人类房室结传导中众所周知的方向不对称性。(摘要截短于250字)