• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证全科医学:一项范围综述

Evidence-based general practice: a scoping review.

作者信息

Cheng Yu, Zou Chuan, Liu Chaojie, Jia Yu, Yang Rong, Zhang Yonggang, Han Jianjun, Lei Yi, Liao Xiaoyang

机构信息

General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Teaching & Research Section, General Practice Research Institute, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 14;26(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02838-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02838-6
PMID:40369414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12076870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based medicine(EBM) is widely used across various disciplines globally. However, in general practice, we need a more person-centered approach rather than a disease-centered one. The differentiation of evidence-based general practice (EBGP) is essential. This scoping review aims to extract a potential definition of EBGP and uncover its characteristics in implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases - PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library - spanning from the inception of these databases to September 24, 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies focusing on EBM in general practice, involving general practitioners as study participants, and reporting any aspects related to providing evidence-based care. Our screening process involved evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts to extract definitions and characteristics from all relevant records discussing EBGP. These identified characteristics were then categorized and thematically grouped following the guidelines outlined in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

We initially retrieved 20,263 records from the original search. Among these, 40 records aligned with our inclusion criteria. The majority of these records took the form of reviews, qualitative studies, comments, cross-sectional surveys, or editorials. From these 40 studies, we extracted 33 unique characteristics of EBGP. Subsequently, these characteristics were thematically grouped into 19 categories, which fell under five overarching themes: evidence base, GP's role, person's role, care process, and care environment.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the following definition for EBGP: Applying a combination of the best available evidence, integrated within the inner and outer contexts of general practice, person preferences, and the expertise of the general practitioner to formulate shared, person-centered decisions aimed at holistic care. This definition provides a solid foundational framework for the development of EBGP guidelines and policies.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2UNX7 .

摘要

背景

循证医学(EBM)在全球各学科中广泛应用。然而,在全科医疗中,我们需要一种更以患者为中心的方法,而非以疾病为中心的方法。循证全科医疗(EBGP)的区分至关重要。本范围综述旨在提取EBGP的潜在定义,并揭示其在实施中的特征。

方法

我们对三个数据库——PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆——进行了全面检索,检索时间跨度从这些数据库建立之初至2023年9月24日。纳入标准包括聚焦于全科医疗中循证医学的研究、以全科医生作为研究参与者以及报告与提供循证医疗相关的任何方面。我们的筛选过程包括评估标题、摘要和全文,以从所有讨论EBGP的相关记录中提取定义和特征。然后,根据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)中概述的指南,对这些确定的特征进行分类和主题分组。

结果

我们最初从原始检索中获得20263条记录。其中,40条记录符合我们的纳入标准。这些记录大多数采用综述、定性研究、评论、横断面调查或社论的形式。从这40项研究中,我们提取了EBGP的33个独特特征。随后,这些特征被主题分组为19个类别,这些类别归属于五个总体主题:证据基础、全科医生的角色、患者的角色、护理过程和护理环境。

结论

我们为EBGP提出以下定义:将最佳可得证据与全科医疗的内部和外部环境、患者偏好以及全科医生的专业知识相结合,以制定旨在提供整体护理的、以患者为中心的共同决策。这一定义为EBGP指南和政策的制定提供了坚实的基础框架。

注册号

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2UNX7 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20e/12076870/59e99440c63b/12875_2025_2838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20e/12076870/3dfe071f1fba/12875_2025_2838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20e/12076870/59e99440c63b/12875_2025_2838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20e/12076870/3dfe071f1fba/12875_2025_2838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20e/12076870/59e99440c63b/12875_2025_2838_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-based general practice: a scoping review.循证全科医学:一项范围综述
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 14;26(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02838-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Features and development trends of primary care research conducted by practice-based research networks from 1991 to 2023: a scoping review protocol.1991 年至 2023 年基于实践的研究网络进行的初级保健研究的特征和发展趋势:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 13;12(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02395-y.
9
10
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines, Consensus Statements, and Standards for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Systematic Review.人工智能在医学中的应用指南、共识声明和标准:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 22;25:e46089. doi: 10.2196/46089.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine to Treat Cancer Pain in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.氯胺酮治疗成年患者癌症疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Mar;67(3):e185-e210. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.
体外膜肺氧合治疗 COVID-19 和流感相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征:系统评价。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(10):951-959. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2272704. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
The doctor-patient relationship is another casualty of NHS backlogs.医患关系是英国国家医疗服务体系积压问题的又一受害者。
BMJ. 2023 Apr 25;381:934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p934.
5
A scoping review of evidence-based guidance and guidelines published by general practice professional organizations.基于循证的指导和指南的范围综述,由普通实践专业组织发布。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):404-418. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad015.
6
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
7
Increasing general practitioner use of evidence-based medicine in teaching and clinical practice through evidence-based journal clubs.通过循证期刊俱乐部提高全科医生在教学和临床实践中应用循证医学的能力。
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Aug;27(4):271-275. doi: 10.1071/PY20267.
8
Antibiotic stewardship challenges in an evolving health-care market in China.中国不断发展的医疗保健市场中的抗生素管理挑战。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):753-754. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30685-X. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Link of Patient Care Outcome to Occupational Differences in Response to Human Resource Management: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study on Hospital Doctors and Nurses in China.患者护理结果与应对人力资源管理方面的职业差异的关联:一项针对中国医院医生和护士的横断面比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124379.
10
Awareness, attitudes, barriers, and knowledge about evidence-based medicine among family physicians in Croatia: a cross-sectional study.克罗地亚家庭医生对循证医学的认识、态度、障碍和知识:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 16;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01162-5.